Just as long as those who are addicted to suckling at the grand teat of government outnumber the [STRIKE]slaves[/STRIKE] productive members of society. It wouldn't do well to have anyone left who thought for themselves.
On second review; maybe that ought not be purple.
You decide
I was about to respond when I saw the purple. Then I read the next sentence. Now I don't know what to do.
Get off the fence on second thought.. What do U think?
FIFY....Just as long as those who are addicted to suckling at the grand teat of government outnumber the [STRIKE]slaves[/STRIKE] productive members of society. It wouldn't do well to have anyone left who thought for themselves.
On second review; maybe that ought not be purple.
You decide
Population reduction wouldnt be a bad idea coming from certain angles. Raising the penalties for rape, child molesting, and other heinous crimes against people to capitol punishment would reduce numbers, and prevent those criminals from further reproduction. Lots to consider when thinking about thinning the heard, and from a taxpayer standpoint, I cannot see the down side to weeding out the non-productive members in our society.
The chosen 4% would serve the 1%i'm sure i am one of the 95% they'd like to see gone, but i'd be curious to see the real hit list. is it purely racial, economic, educational, religiously, or politically based?
and who would perform all the manufacturing and service jobs if all of us undesirables were gone?
jake
The problem comes in when someone else is deciding for you how many children you're going to have.