Uh. Well. I don’t know if this is related to the responsibility owed by gun owners as a collective but, uh, I’ve kinda had my eye on a CZ Shadow 2 in urban grey. I promise to handle it safely and not shoot anyone that don’t need shot with it.
No.Uh. Well. I don’t know if this is related to the responsibility owed by gun owners as a collective but, uh, I’ve kinda had my eye on a CZ Shadow 2 in urban grey. I promise to handle it safely and not shoot anyone that don’t need shot with it.
Is that responsible enough for Matt?
www.texastribune.org
Not one of these things would have prevented Uvalde, Buffalo, or any other incident.
Matthew McConaughey: There's a difference between gun control and gun responsibility
I'm from Uvalde, Texas. The debate about gun control has delivered nothing but status quo.www.reporternews.com
McConaughey's ideas on nurturing required responsibility. It is the responsibility of gun owners to restore "responsible gun ownership" in the short term to preserve our rights. Things like:
Universal background checks
Raising the age to 21 to purchase an "assault weapon"
Red flag laws should be the law of the land
National waiting period
Safe storage
He started out on the right track in the article about things like addressing mental health issues, school safety, the prevalence of sensationalized media coverage and the decaying state of American values which he says are all long-term issues that need to be addressed but there isn't time to do it now so in the interim. we need to focus on "restoring responsible gun ownership" Suggesting that we are not being responsible gun owners if we do not make compromises on a few "reasonable" measures in the short term while addressing the aforementioned long-term issues.
Addressing "long-term issues" are what the Republicans have been wanting to focus on for a long time. They want to address core issues.
The problem is Democrats never want to address those issues and subsequently societal issues get worse and worse leading to more violence.
Instead, they opt to blame everything on the guns without addressing the core issues. IMO neglecting those issues for so long is not the responsible thing to do and has led us down the path to where we are today.
I'm hearing (WIBC) in reference to this article the Police Chief in question (caps lock appropriate here) DIDN'T KNOW HE WAS THE ON-SCENE COMMANDER (C2, Command and Control, it is a thing. It's an important thing.) and didn't have a radio SO HE COULD USE HIS GUN. Is this 1955 and the radio weighs 10 pounds?Some info I just read the chief didn't have a radio, he wanted to keep both hands free for his gun. So supposedly he didn't know about the 911 calls. I'm calling BS on that. There were plenty of other officers around that he would have either heard it over their radios or they would have told him. Heck one of his officers got a call from his wife who said the other teacher was dead and she was shot. Not to mention if your scene commander you kinda need a way to communicate with everyone. They went in twice and the scum shot at them through the door so they backed off. They had 7 officers in the building within minutes of the scum going in.
What we know, minute by minute, about how the Uvalde shooting and police response unfolded
State officials provided a timeline of the massacre and have corrected crucial details amid public demands for information on how authorities handled the situation.
Let that sink in.
The political class is becoming irrelevant in my eyes and everything they do is pandering and staying in the limelight.Oh look, when people follow simple security procedures and the police don't stand idly by, we get a happy ending...
Man trying to 'aggressively' enter Gadsden elementary school shot and killed by police
And we didn't have to pass a single new law to do it. I'm shocked.
sounds like he needed to be shotOh look, when people follow simple security procedures and the police don't stand idly by, we get a happy ending...
Man trying to 'aggressively' enter Gadsden elementary school shot and killed by police
And we didn't have to pass a single new law to do it. I'm shocked.
My idea as a responsible gun owner of dealing with a deranged individual hijacking and abusing Second Amendment rights by killing innocents is to exercise MY Second Amendment right to defend myself and my family by trying like hell to put a bullet thru their evil brain pan.
He didn't know? He was the one giving the ****ing orders.
Quite possible.
www.kxan.com
He wanted to keep both hands free for his gun? Really? For what? To stroke it while the shooter is still active?Some info I just read the chief didn't have a radio, he wanted to keep both hands free for his gun. So supposedly he didn't know about the 911 calls. I'm calling BS on that. There were plenty of other officers around that he would have either heard it over their radios or they would have told him. Heck one of his officers got a call from his wife who said the other teacher was dead and she was shot. Not to mention if your scene commander you kinda need a way to communicate with everyone. They went in twice and the scum shot at them through the door so they backed off. They had 7 officers in the building within minutes of the scum going in.
What we know, minute by minute, about how the Uvalde shooting and police response unfolded
State officials provided a timeline of the massacre and have corrected crucial details amid public demands for information on how authorities handled the situation.
Closed door hearing happened in tx on Thursday. Reports coming out of that say chief and others on scene knew there were kids alive in the room.
at least 3 died en route or pretty much as soon as they got to hospital, they could have been saved if cops hadnt delayed.
Aware of Injuries Inside, Uvalde Police Waited to Confront Gunman (Published 2022)
More than a dozen students remained alive for over an hour before officers entered their classrooms. The commander feared a risk to officers’ lives, new documents show.www.nytimes.com
