To Mask or Not to Mask?

[CampingJosh]

Your claim to the contrary is more or less the same line of argumentation that says that someone merely carrying a firearm is infringing on the right to safety of others around the carrier. One, there is no right to "safety", just as there is no right not to get sick. Two, again, there is no evidence that someone carrying a firearm is likely to cause harm to another using that firearm, just as there is no evidence that someone merely not wearing a mask is going to make someone else sick from a respiratory virus.

Can the person carrying that firearm shoot someone around them willy-nilly so long as the person shot doesn't die? That seems to be your argument, that if they don't die their rights weren't violated. After all, there's only the right to life, not the right to not get shot.

 

[BugI02]

For your argument to even come within shouting distance of making sense, the people with the firearms would have to be issued magazines many of which would contain dummy rounds, so that they would not know whether their particular firearm was potentially deadly

Just like the people electing to not wear a mask, and the people Karening them, are equally unaware of any particular person's infectious status. And to make it even more realistic, only about 1 in 10 should be issued live ammo

 

[JettaKnight]

Speaking of Karens.. her name really is Karen!

Don't want to wear a mask, cool, but if a business says it's time to go, it's time to go.




Obviously she was looking to make a point and under some misguided idea that she could get some LEO in trouble.

 

[actaeon277]

The law is called "Trespassing".
Duh.

 

[drillsgt]

Speaking of Karens.. her name really is Karen!

Don't want to wear a mask, cool, but if a business says it's time to go, it's time to go.




Obviously she was looking to make a point and under some misguided idea that she could get some LEO in trouble.

Is she really the 'karen' or is it the store or the whiny customer that called, just let her get her groceries and leave.

 

[Sylvain]

The law is called "Trespassing".
Duh.

Yeah, she's an idiot.

She thinks if she doesn't break any FEDERAL law she can do anything she wants.

 

[kickbacked]

Is she really the 'karen' or is it the store or the whiny customer that called, just let her get her groceries and leave.

Its private property, and id bet the business can be fined for not following the mask orders.

 

[JettaKnight]

Is she really the 'karen' or is it the store or the whiny customer that called, just let her get her groceries and leave.

Karen Turner of Parma Heights, Ohio.
https://wkfr.com/ohio-woman-named-karen-arrested-for-being-a-karen/

 

[JettaKnight]

Yeah, she's an idiot.

She thinks if she doesn't break any FEDERAL law she can do anything she wants.

Me thinks that in normal day-to-day life she normally decries "federal overreach".

 

[drillsgt]

Karen Turner of Parma Heights, Ohio.
https://wkfr.com/ohio-woman-named-karen-arrested-for-being-a-karen/

Mask today, semi-auto or 'high capacity' magazine tomorrow, maybe someday somebody will make a video of you.

 

[chipbennett]

Can the person carrying that firearm shoot someone around them willy-nilly so long as the person shot doesn't die? That seems to be your argument, that if they don't die their rights weren't violated. After all, there's only the right to life, not the right to not get shot.

No; that's your (and yet another) straw man.

Breathing is now a "willy nilly" act? At some point, are we going to move past sophistry?

 

[JettaKnight]

Mask today, semi-auto or 'high capacity' magazine tomorrow, maybe someday somebody will make a video of you.

 

[SwikLS]

 

[CampingJosh]

At some point, are we going to move past sophistry?

Is a person responsible for the reasonably foreseeable harm he causes to another person who is acting within their own rights?

 

[Sylvain]

View attachment 126211

 

[nonobaddog]

Can the person carrying that firearm shoot someone around them willy-nilly so long as the person shot doesn't die? That seems to be your argument, that if they don't die their rights weren't violated. After all, there's only the right to life, not the right to not get shot.

Wow.
I think you have worms in your apples.

 

[SwikLS]

 

[JettaKnight]

Yeah, he's been on a roll this week. It's kind of humorous how people can make such giant leaps in logic.

 

[BugI02]

Is a person responsible for the reasonably foreseeable harm he causes to another person who is acting within their own rights?

The INGO Biden voters seem to be saying 'no'

 

[Ingomike]

Yeah, he's been on a roll this week. It's kind of humorous how people can make such giant leaps in logic.

It is not funny that much society cannot use logic at all.

Failed to learn history and are doomed to repeat the worst parts...