I mostly agree with you. He may not be anti 2a but hes not pro 2A enough for me to get behind. Hes talked about rising the age to buy firearms from 18 to 21. He stoped one thing from Obama from going into effect but didn't come through on his universal ccw or deregulation of suppressors talk. Nor did he roll back any power the ATF has been abusing for years. Hes been wishy-washy on universal background checks and seems to endorse red flag laws. Its alot of little things that bulid up to be showing me hoe 2A friendly he really is.Like I've been saying upthread, Trump's bumpstock order isn't exactly evidence of being anti-2A. I think his advisors advised him poorly and he went along with that. I don't think anti-gun is a wart that Trump legitimately has. I wouldn't say he's as pro-gun as many of us are. But I don't have any evidence that anti gun at this point either.
The problem with the bump stock ban is that it is an abuse of his authority. He used power he doesn't have to do it, and it goes unchallenged because the people that should challenge it don't want to lose the potential for that power themselves. That's a wart for sure.
His part in operation warpspeed is also a wart.
As well, him putting the power of the federal government behind lock-downs is a wart.
Arguably not firing Fauci is a wart, but that's a wart most politicians would have too. With the press we have now, that would have been sticky politics to navigate for sure, especially for Trump.