Beer Virus VI-The Final Episode..... Hopefully

[smokingman]

Peer reviewed. Shows blood abnormalities in 80+-% of those vaccinated.

View of Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna

ijvtpr.com

 

[smokingman]

If the last study I posted made you upset wait until you see this one published in the New England Journal of Medicine yesterday.

887,193 children 5 to 11 all with at least one mRna shot AND one booster.
In short they would need to give them boosters every 15 weeks to maintain effectiveness. It drops from 95% to 15% in that time frame(where they cut off the front page of the study at 15 weeks,it went to 22 weeks in the data posted with it,but by then immunity of the vaccinated and boosted was negative 20.7%). The study also includes non-vaccinated. Their natural immunity was 90% and dropped to 60% in the same 15 week time period. Natural is far superior.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2209371

Now my largest problem with the study. The data. Almost all of it is estimated,modeled,and what is not is based on lab reports in just North Carolina. If those are all correct and you can accept them look at page 6,you will notice something not mentioned on the cover sheet or in the study.

"Estimates and 95% Confidence Intervals for the Effectiveness of the Two-Dose
BNT162b2 Vaccine in Reducing the Rate of SARS-CoV-2"
week 20 and week 22. -15.6% and -20.7% in other words by that time not only is the vaccine not protecting from infection but the chance for a reinfection is actually higher with less immunity than someone who never had a shot.
It is harming the natural immunity of the child and sets them up to need repeated boosters(which is what the study recommends).

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMc2209371/suppl_file/nejmc2209371_appendix.pdf

Related study on immunity after vaccination(pre print,just for clarity).

Pre-exposure to mRNA-LNP inhibits adaptive immune responses and alters innate immune fitness in an inheritable fashion

Hundreds of millions of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine doses have already been administered to humans. However, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the immune effects of this platform. The mRNA-LNP-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is highly inflammatory, and its synthetic ionizable lipid component...

www.biorxiv.org

"Authors Summary We bring experimental evidence that pre-exposure to mRNA-LNPs or its LNP component affects innate and adaptive immune responses. Pre-exposure to mRNA-LNPs led to long-term inhibition of the adaptive immune responses.....
In summary, the mRNA-LNP vaccine platform induces long-term immunological changes that can affect both adaptive immune responses and heterologous protection against infections, some of which can be inherited by the offspring. More studies are needed to understand the mechanisms responsible for these effects and determine this platform’s impact on human health."

 

[bobzilla]

Posted that to another board yesterday and was literally called a science denier. I’m showing you the science and you’re denying it’s real. Who’s the denier?

 

[wtburnette]

Posted that to another board yesterday and was literally called a science denier. I’m showing you the science and you’re denying it’s real. Who’s the denier?

All goes back to this being a religion for the Left. How dare you offer sacrilege like that.

 

[MRockwell]

Might as well lock the thread, the pandemic is over...potatoJoe said so:

 

[chipbennett]

Might as well lock the thread, the pandemic is over...potatoJoe said so:

Beat me to the punch. The pandemic is "over" when that status suits the administration, but is still going on when that status benefits them (such as for the PHE).

 

[DadSmith]

Rand Paul exposing what many of us already sensed. I hope they put Dr Fauci behind bars, along with anyone involved.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

 

[DoggyDaddy]

But... HoRsEpAsTe!

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

But... HoRsEpAsTe!

All hail the experts!

 

[KLB]

They keep saying a study needs to be performed, but they won't actually perform one.

 

[BiscuitsandGravy]

They keep saying a study needs to be performed, but they won't actually perform one.

Why would you study it if you cannot make any money from it?

 

[nonobaddog]

They keep saying a study needs to be performed, but they won't actually perform one.

Exactly! Most of those early studies say a study needs to be done to look specifically at that but it never happens. There has been plenty of time.
Most of the funding for medical research comes from NIH and big pharma. NIH will not fund a study to look into Ivermectin because of fauci and big pharma won't fund it because it doesn't do anything for them.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Exactly! Most of those early studies say a study needs to be done to look specifically at that but it never happens. There has been plenty of time.
Most of the funding for medical research comes from NIH and big pharma. NIH will not fund a study to look into Ivermectin because of fauci and big pharma won't fund it because it doesn't do anything for them.

Exactly. Why do you think they refuse to fund research into medical uses for marijuana?

 

[JCSR]

 

[DadSmith]

Funding Documents Expose Virologist Danielle Anderson, Once Feted as a "Conspiracy Buster"

For over two years, the virologist posed as a fact checker and biosafety expert on China, without disclosure of grants involving risky gain of function studies.

disinformationchronicle.substack.com

There is, however, a glaring omission from the media’s portrayal of Anderson as brave truth speaker. None of the fact checks or news stories disclose that her name has appeared on multiple grants for projects aiming to manipulate coronaviruses, including a National Institutes of Health award to Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, and a grant that was rejected by the U.S. military research agency DARPA, in part for risky gain of function research.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

 

[JCSR]

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Don’t want to go bald? Get your shots!

(It’s already too late for me).

 

[smokingman]

Swiss study proves beyond all doubt the mRNA Pfizer vaccine alters human DNA(not just RNA) permanently.

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human...

www.mdpi.com