I found this quote from Trump shortly after the attack on WTC.
He viewied the events of the day as a pecker contest on building height.
The man lacks an empathy gene.
A marker of of a psychopath, IIRC.
I found this quote from Trump shortly after the attack on WTC.
He viewied the events of the day as a pecker contest on building height.
The man lacks an empathy gene.
Typed just like the leftists would want.
Just because the left was wrong about Russia, doesn't mean that China did not interfere with this election. Trump was hurting them, they had to get a globalist puppet back in...
No other Republican would have needed 74 million votes to beat Biden. Without Trump, Dem voter turnout would have been significantly lower.
Outside of his family, NOBODY voted for Joe Biden. They voted for NOT Donald Trump.
Didn’t he oppose the military actions of Bush back then? If there is a policy he’s pursued that I would call out as pandering, it’s probably his pro-military spending posture.I think Trump leans anti-war because that's where the polls led him.
In 2002 he would have been preparing to turn the Middle East into glass.... IMHO.
I think it's pretty clear that Russians tried to influence the 2016 election. There was, however, no evidence that Trump was a part of it in any way. Further, it was a matter of "influence", not tampering with the voting or counting.
Why would we be surprised that any competing superpower...or just short of superpower...would try to influence a U.S. election?
So, does this concept extend to anyone or is it unique to Trump? Are you telling me Nixon wasn't reviled by his opponents in 1972? That he was adored by his supporters?
I am skeptical that people who initially voted for Trump ignored his very real and desireable (from conservative viewpoints) accomplishments and voted for a Democrat simply because Trump didn't act presidential
Yeah. That is the crux of it. Another republican, such as GW, wouldn't make the presidency about himself. Hopefully, they would not have tweeted such ridiculous junk. And, they would have still accomplished much of what Trump has done that is important. But, it wouldn't have been a revolving door for the staff. Other countries wouldn't have been called ****holes. etc etc
We've had a cult of personality since 2008. I'm tired of it. Give me a president who recognizes that he serves the citizenry over gameshow hosts and transformational Hawaiians.
We can extrapolate something closer to his true aspirations today by looking at the things he praised or criticized before he ran for president. He’s accused of being a war monger and literally Hitler. And there aren’t really any indications from his past that those criticisms are accurate. He hasn’t gotten us entangled in any now wars, nor has he seemed to advocate for such. Both claims strike me as bull****.Why are we talking about what he would’ve done in 2002? Seems kinda, I dunno, irrelevant
Times have changed since Nixon. And there's plenty of other detractions about Trump other than his demeanor.
So, does this concept extend to anyone or is it unique to Trump?...
No other Republican would have needed 74 million votes to beat Biden. Without Trump, Dem voter turnout would have been significantly lower.
Outside of his family, NOBODY voted for Joe Biden. They voted for NOT Donald Trump.
For another perspective I remember that time even though I was young. My parents weren’t very political, but they seemed to like Nixon. I’m thinking they voted for him if they did vote. During Watergate it did not seem to me that they believed it went as deep as it did. I don’t think they hated him. It was more like removing layers of a rotten onion and not knowing how rotten it is until you got to the lowest layer.Pretty much everything about Trump's presidency is unique.
But I wasn't alive for the '72 election.
So let's ask Alpo; was your level of negative feelings for Tricky Dick less than, greater than, or equal to your negative feelings toward Trump? I realize this is a small sample size, but it should shed some light on the topic.
And I'm just gonna go out on a limb say no way Nixon's adoration level among his supporters reaches that of Trump. If it did, Nixon would NEVER have resigned.
Trump is so bad. Thank God for Biden, now we can pay more taxes, pay more for fuel, and give up our guns.
Can't believe some of you "gun owners" carry on this way.
I think it's pretty clear that Russians tried to influence the 2016 election. There was, however, no evidence that Trump was a part of it in any way. Further, it was a matter of "influence", not tampering with the voting or counting.
Why would we be surprised that any competing superpower...or just short of superpower...would try to influence a U.S. election?
Nope. It makes sense for a superpower, even us, to do so. It would be baffling that neither China nor Russia would attempt to influence, at the very least if not tamper, in the election of an adversary.
Pretty much everything about Trump's presidency is unique.
But I wasn't alive for the '72 election.
So let's ask Alpo; was your level of negative feelings for Tricky Dick less than, greater than, or equal to your negative feelings toward Trump? I realize this is a small sample size, but it should shed some light on the topic.
And I'm just gonna go out on a limb say no way Nixon's adoration level among his supporters reaches that of Trump. If it did, Nixon would NEVER have resigned.
Maybe we should... I don't know... secure the vote somehow by eliminating voting methods easily susceptible to tampering?
Nah, that's voter suppression printcraft, count all the votes...
even the illegal ones!