So, which news do you trust?
So, which news do you trust?
I support this 100%.
That's a really difficult question to answer. Philosophically, I don't believe humans have the ability in most cases to organize sufficiently for a conspiracy. That has changed with the explosion of information sources available on the internet. So, generally, I trust no one. But, ultimately, decision making is required on important issues, such as Covid. So, I took the risk and got the vaccine. With my age and health profile, it was the safest bet. And looking at the covid infection results of the males within my family, it was probably the right bet.
People leveraging past employment to pursue future endeavors.
Really? Really? That is what you get from that? The. We truly are lost.People leveraging past employment to pursue future endeavors.
The Horror! The Horror!
What should be done?
Government service no compete clause in contracts. You can't work in any industry you regulated for five years after you leave the government under pain of fine and imprisonmentPeople leveraging past employment to pursue future endeavors.
The Horror! The Horror!
What should be done?
No, we're not lost. The willfully blind don't move opinion that muchReally? Really? That is what you get from that? The. We truly are lost.
When left to draw my own conclusions, I often generate questions.Really? Really? That is what you get from that? The. We truly are lost.
Sounds like a great idea. I could support that.Government service no compete clause in contracts. You can't work in any industry you regulated for five years after you leave the government under pain of fine and imprisonment
You don’t see a conflict of interest?People leveraging past employment to pursue future endeavors.
The Horror! The Horror!
What should be done?
Maybe he just can’t draw very well?When left to draw my own conclusions, I often generate questions.
Doesn't sound like a feature
Incorrect. The rules do not preclude unethical behavior and likely contribute to cronyismSounds like a great idea. I could support that.
So they did nothing wrong though according to the rules and we want more rules.
People leveraging past employment to pursue future endeavors.
The Horror! The Horror!
What should be done?
So if you want better instead of more, what rule are we replacing with a better one?Incorrect. The rules do not preclude unethical behavior and likely contribute to cronyism
We want BETTER rules