He was a local Chicago shock jock who transitioned to syndicated conservative talk, I believe.Yes... Mancow! That's the one. I kind of enjoyed him!
I don't think there is any story, publicly, on motive yet. I don't know anything about the case, so I'm calling "lover's triangle" in the betting pool.
...Sexton told police the man who shot at him was the very husband of the woman he was having an affair with.
... told police that after finishing a performance in Portland, Indiana, he contacted his “girlfriend” and asked to meet her at Northside Bar and Grill on Shadeland Avenue. While referring to her as his “girlfriend,” Sexton told police both he and the Fountaintown woman were “currently married to other people.”
You sure did. That certainly seemed the most logical happening based on what we knew…Docs: ‘Bob & Tom’ comedian shot at after caught by husband while having affair in Indianapolis
INDIANAPOLIS — Court documents detail an affair spurred to violence involving “Bob & Tom” comedian Ronald Sexton, better known as Donnie Baker, and a Fountaintown woman. Previously,…fox59.com
Again, called it.
It's like he's a real life Donnie BakerDocs: ‘Bob & Tom’ comedian shot at after caught by husband while having affair in Indianapolis
INDIANAPOLIS — Court documents detail an affair spurred to violence involving “Bob & Tom” comedian Ronald Sexton, better known as Donnie Baker, and a Fountaintown woman. Previously,…fox59.com
Again, called it.
You sure did. That certainly seemed the most logical happening based on what we knew…
State law................I swear to God.If you get shot in Indy (or, really, anywhere that's not a battlefield/terrorist event), the *strong* odds are:
1) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in the narcotics trade
2) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing criminal activity
3) You and/or your immediate companions are idiots "beefing" with each other over some perceived slight
4) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing domestic/lover's squabbles.
There are outliers. Some people are truly minding their own business and trouble finds them. Most have made a series of choices that lead to the odds of them getting shot continually rising, though. Someone usually jumps in with some "victim blaming" nonsense when you point that out, but recognizing that lifestyle choices raise your risk of violent crime is not the same as saying you deserve it. Those are two independent metrics, and I'm only addressing the first.
Given I doubted "Donnie" was in on the 1 or 2, 3 and 4 seemed the most likely. Given demographics (#3 skews heavily toward youths), #4 was the most likely. I just played the odds.
That's just gosh darn good detective work.If you get shot in Indy (or, really, anywhere that's not a battlefield/terrorist event), the *strong* odds are:
1) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in the narcotics trade
2) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing criminal activity
3) You and/or your immediate companions are idiots "beefing" with each other over some perceived slight
4) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing domestic/lover's squabbles.
There are outliers. Some people are truly minding their own business and trouble finds them. Most have made a series of choices that lead to the odds of them getting shot continually rising, though. Someone usually jumps in with some "victim blaming" nonsense when you point that out, but recognizing that lifestyle choices raise your risk of violent crime is not the same as saying you deserve it. Those are two independent metrics, and I'm only addressing the first.
Given I doubted "Donnie" was in on the 1 or 2, 3 and 4 seemed the most likely. Given demographics (#3 skews heavily toward youths), #4 was the most likely. I just played the odds.
5. I was in love with your avatar and wanted to meet...If you get shot in Indy (or, really, anywhere that's not a battlefield/terrorist event), the *strong* odds are:
1) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in the narcotics trade
2) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing criminal activity
3) You and/or your immediate companions are idiots "beefing" with each other over some perceived slight
4) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing domestic/lover's squabbles.
There are outliers. Some people are truly minding their own business and trouble finds them. Most have made a series of choices that lead to the odds of them getting shot continually rising, though. Someone usually jumps in with some "victim blaming" nonsense when you point that out, but recognizing that lifestyle choices raise your risk of violent crime is not the same as saying you deserve it. Those are two independent metrics, and I'm only addressing the first.
Given I doubted "Donnie" was in on the 1 or 2, 3 and 4 seemed the most likely. Given demographics (#3 skews heavily toward youths), #4 was the most likely. I just played the odds.
I think a few years ago there was a little dust up with his snooty neihbor Mitchell, something about a stolen jon boat, so, you just never know.Who the heck would shoot at Donnie Baker, if it wasn't a jilted love triangle thing.
Yep. Strict adherence to the S4 rule usually alleviates any issues.If you get shot in Indy (or, really, anywhere that's not a battlefield/terrorist event), the *strong* odds are:
1) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in the narcotics trade
2) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing criminal activity
3) You and/or your immediate companions are idiots "beefing" with each other over some perceived slight
4) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing domestic/lover's squabbles.
There are outliers. Some people are truly minding their own business and trouble finds them. Most have made a series of choices that lead to the odds of them getting shot continually rising, though. Someone usually jumps in with some "victim blaming" nonsense when you point that out, but recognizing that lifestyle choices raise your risk of violent crime is not the same as saying you deserve it. Those are two independent metrics, and I'm only addressing the first.
Given I doubted "Donnie" was in on the 1 or 2, 3 and 4 seemed the most likely. Given demographics (#3 skews heavily toward youths), #4 was the most likely. I just played the odds.
I would but my employer pays me a lot of money to do all that.Yep. Strict adherence to the S4 rule usually alleviates any issues.
Stay away from:
1. Stupid people doing
2. Stupid things in
3. Stupid places at
4. Stupid times.
I like your 1,2, and 4 but 3 really seems like catch all.If you get shot in Indy (or, really, anywhere that's not a battlefield/terrorist event), the *strong* odds are:
1) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in the narcotics trade
2) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing criminal activity
3) You and/or your immediate companions are idiots "beefing" with each other over some perceived slight
4) You and/or your immediate companions are involved in ongoing domestic/lover's squabbles.
There are outliers. Some people are truly minding their own business and trouble finds them. Most have made a series of choices that lead to the odds of them getting shot continually rising, though. Someone usually jumps in with some "victim blaming" nonsense when you point that out, but recognizing that lifestyle choices raise your risk of violent crime is not the same as saying you deserve it. Those are two independent metrics, and I'm only addressing the first.
Given I doubted "Donnie" was in on the 1 or 2, 3 and 4 seemed the most likely. Given demographics (#3 skews heavily toward youths), #4 was the most likely. I just played the odds.