Gr666mer Updates

[DadSmith]

Just in at the right time.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Just in at the right time.

I only watched the first couple of minutes but he’s right. Since the fall of Roe, it’s almost like you can hear the demonic shrieks now. The slouching has been occurring for a couple of generations now but now, the forces of evil seem to be riled up and pressing like their time might be short.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

Child porn is against the law here, and you know that. Your generalization of some people is tiresome and incorrect.
And some folks are lacking with the knowledge and true understanding of our First Amendment.
Heres some help.

The five freedoms it protects: speech, religion, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. Together, these five guaranteed freedoms make the people of the United States of America the freest in the world.

"Child porn" is illegal if you mean making porn with actual children in it. Sadly, making porn that appears to include children, as well as distributing porn to children in schools and libraries, is anything but illegal.

What generalization have I made that is incorrect?

I am perfectly aware of the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment, and none of them properly apply to the evils perpetrated by the porn industry.

 

[Creedmoor]

Back then it wasn't glorified by mainstream culture, nor pushed for children, and I don't believe for a moment that the founding fathers planned on the First Amendment being used as a justification for changing either of those things.

Yes, I am aware that there are people who disagree with me. I've found that those are generally the same people who are fine with children being dismembered alive and their body parts harvested for scientific experiments. This isn't about me being "uncomfortable" with those people, it's about me recognizing that what these people push is evil, and has no place in decent, civilized society.

"Child porn" is illegal if you mean making porn with actual children in it. Sadly, making porn that appears to include children, as well as distributing porn to children in schools and libraries, is anything but illegal.

What generalization have I made that is incorrect?

I am perfectly aware of the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment, and none of them properly apply to the evils perpetrated by the porn industry.

Dude I hope you dont get tired on that tall pillar you stand on.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

Dude I hope you dont get tired on that tall pillar you stand on.

Wow. If not wanting porn to be distributed to children is a moral standard so high you call it standing on a tall pillar...

I just don't know what to say to you.

 

[Creedmoor]

Wow. If not wanting porn to be distributed to children is a moral standard so high you call it standing on a tall pillar...

I just don't know what to say to you.

Funny how some seem to believe what ones personal thoughts and believes are here, without posting them.
Freedom is Uncomfortable.

The People vers Larry Flint.

 

[DadSmith]

Aurora Man Arrested on Multiple Counts of Child Exploitation

content.govdelivery.com

 

[AndreusMaximus]

Funny how some seem to believe what ones personal thoughts and believes are here, without posting them.
Freedom is Uncomfortable.

The People vers Larry Flint.

I finding it to be a pattern with you that you perpetually accuse me of misrepresenting your beliefs, but consistently refuse to clarify which beliefs I've misrepresented, or what your actual beliefs are.

Did you or did you not accuse me of standing on a "tall pillar" after I expressed support for taking action against pornography being distributed to children within our school/library system, and stated that I believed such a thing does not fall under the protection of the First Amendment?

 

[Cameramonkey]

I finding it to be a pattern with you that you perpetually accuse me of misrepresenting your beliefs, but consistently refuse to clarify which beliefs I've misrepresented, or what your actual beliefs are.

Did you or did you not accuse me of standing on a "tall pillar" after I expressed support for taking action against pornography being distributed to children within our school/library system, and stated that I believed such a thing does not fall under the protection of the First Amendment?

Edit: He and another former user are Kut from the same cloth.

 

[jamil]

Funny how some seem to believe what ones personal thoughts and believes are here, without posting them.
Freedom is Uncomfortable.

The People vers Larry Flint.

We’re not talking about adults and Hustler though right? The idea is adult teachers distributing porn to school kids. Is not allowing that really a first amendment problem?

 

[Cameramonkey]

We’re not talking about adults and Hustler though right? The idea is adult teachers distributing porn to school kids. Is not allowing that really a first amendment problem?

Good point.

Is telling minors they cant have booze or drink it a violation of the 21st amendment?

Some folks like to ignore key details to fit their agendas.

 

[Creedmoor]

We’re not talking about adults and Hustler though right? The idea is adult teachers distributing porn to school kids. Is not allowing that really a first amendment problem?

What porn is being distributed to underage children?

 

[Creedmoor]

Edit: He and another former user are Kut from the same cloth.

Cool story bro, Kut was a racist.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

What porn is being distributed to underage children?

Primer: School Systems Are Corrupting Children with Pornography | The Center for Renewing America

Summary Over the past two years, parents across the nation have begun to recognize the…

americarenewing.com

Georgia parent reading sexual content from library at school board meeting is cut off: 'Inappropriate'

Georgia school board member cuts off concerned parent reading explicit passage from book available to students, calls it "inappropriate."

www.foxnews.com

Just a small sampling of examples.

And I'm still waiting on an answer to which of your views I misrepresented...

 

[KLB]

We’re not talking about adults and Hustler though right? The idea is adult teachers distributing porn to school kids. Is not allowing that really a first amendment problem?

Did you miss where it veered into all porn? Go back and review the previous page.

 

[DadSmith]

Primer: School Systems Are Corrupting Children with Pornography | The Center for Renewing America

Summary Over the past two years, parents across the nation have begun to recognize the…

americarenewing.com

Georgia parent reading sexual content from library at school board meeting is cut off: 'Inappropriate'

Georgia school board member cuts off concerned parent reading explicit passage from book available to students, calls it "inappropriate."

www.foxnews.com

Just a small sampling of examples.

And I'm still waiting on an answer to which of your views I misrepresented...

I posted a video by Glenn Beck. He goes into this in pretty good detail. It should wake people up who are asleep.

 

[DadSmith]

 

[Creedmoor]

I finding it to be a pattern with you that you perpetually accuse me of misrepresenting your beliefs, but consistently refuse to clarify which beliefs I've misrepresented, or what your actual beliefs are.

Did you or did you not accuse me of standing on a "tall pillar" after I expressed support for taking action against pornography being distributed to children within our school/library system, and stated that I believed such a thing does not fall under the protection of the First Amendment?

What porn is being distributed to minors?
AndreusMaximus said:
Back then it wasn't glorified by mainstream culture, nor pushed for children, and I don't believe for a moment that the founding fathers planned on the First Amendment being used as a justification for changing either of those things.

Yes, I am aware that there are people who disagree with me. I've found that those are generally the same people who are fine with children being dismembered alive and their body parts harvested for scientific experiments. This isn't about me being "uncomfortable" with those people, it's about me recognizing that what these people push is evil, and has no place in decent, civilized society.

The highlighted orange is a huge generalization.

You act like Christians dont have abortions, get drunk, watch porn, go to adult stores, curse, steal, lie, kill, and by and large are huge hypocrites and so on.

 

[Ingomike]

What porn is being distributed to minors?
AndreusMaximus said:
Back then it wasn't glorified by mainstream culture, nor pushed for children, and I don't believe for a moment that the founding fathers planned on the First Amendment being used as a justification for changing either of those things.

Yes, I am aware that there are people who disagree with me. I've found that those are generally the same people who are fine with children being dismembered alive and their body parts harvested for scientific experiments. This isn't about me being "uncomfortable" with those people, it's about me recognizing that what these people push is evil, and has no place in decent, civilized society.

The highlighted orange is a huge generalization.

You act like Christians dont have abortions, get drunk, watch porn, go to adult stores, curse, steal, lie, kill, and by and large are huge hypocrites and so on.

A hypocrite as you call them are far better that those without standards. It is not even accurate to use the word hypocrite. All men are sinners. The fact that a Christian sins or fails is not a negative on Christ, it is the mortal failings of man. The act of having standards and failing is far better than not having standards at all, though that is not the narrative the left promotes…

 

[Creedmoor]

A hypocrite as you call them are far better that those without standards. It is not even accurate to use the word hypocrite. All men are sinners. The fact that a Christian sins or fails is not a negative on Christ, it is the mortal failings of man. The act of having standards and failing is far better than not having standards at all, though that is not the narrative the left promotes…

Did you not post all men are sinners?
Hypocrite fits well.

Everyone has standards, and they differ across the board.

As long as ones standards are lawful, no one should care.