Biden $200 buy back

[Tombs]

If biden is allowed to get in, anyone who actually owns and uses a firearm will be bankrupt and having to sell their home to cover all the tax stamps.

Just on magazines alone.

This is why, under no condition can he be allowed into the white house.

 

[edwea]

How many bump stocks did they ever end up with? And there are MILLIONS more of these guns/mags out there. I just don't see this happening.

 

[Bennettjh]

How many bump stocks did they ever end up with? And there are MILLIONS more of these guns/mags out there. I just don't see this happening.

We have "gun owners" on here advocating for it so....

 

[CampingJosh]

Any of our resident Biden supporters explained this away yet? I might've missed it up thread.

I don't think there are too many actual Biden supporters here. There are several who think that, on the whole, Biden is less bad (or less dangerous) than Trump, but that's not the same thing as being a Biden supporter.

 

[Bennettjh]

I don't think there are too many actual Biden supporters here. There are several who think that, on the whole, Biden is less bad (or less dangerous) than Trump, but that's not the same thing as being a Biden supporter.

I don't care what they call themselves. A vote for Biden IS a vote for all of his "gun safety" crap. It's as simple as that. One would think, "gun owners" on a gun forum wouldn't be so thrilled to see their rights stripped.

 

[drillsgt]

Any of our resident Biden supporters explained this away yet? I might've missed it up thread.

The only one really honest and straightforward about it was PaulF, it was worth it to him to have Trump gone and he said if they did another AWB he'd turn his in. Everybody else was pretty much orange man bad and deal with the repercussions later.

 

[churchmouse]

I don't think there are too many actual Biden supporters here. There are several who think that, on the whole, Biden is less bad (or less dangerous) than Trump, but that's not the same thing as being a Biden supporter.

You have not read into the threads deeply enough. There are more chills in here than you know.

 

[churchmouse]

The only one really honest and straightforward about it was PaulF, it was worth it to him to have Trump gone and he said if they did another AWB he'd turn his in. Everybody else was pretty much orange man bad and deal with the repercussions later.

Paul was such a deep disappointment.
sad for him we are.

 

[foszoe]

I don't care what they call themselves. A vote for Biden IS a vote for all of his "gun safety" crap. It's as simple as that. One would think, "gun owners" on a gun forum wouldn't be so thrilled to see their rights stripped.

Not that simple. Could just not vote or go third party. In Indiana, Biden votes were just noise.. Why don't you directly ask the Biden voters who advocated for gun ownership limitations? I only remember one and I don't think Paul can post a response.

 

[Bennettjh]

Not that simple. Could just not vote or go third party. In Indiana, Biden votes were just noise.. Why don't you directly ask the Biden voters who advocated for gun ownership limitations? I only remember one and I don't think Paul can post a response.

That's exactly what I'm trying to do. If someone voted for Biden, I'd like to know why they're not concerned with his "gun safety" goals. He won't actually do it, won't be as restrictive, Senate will hopefully stop it, etc.

 

[foszoe]

That's exactly what I'm trying to do. If someone voted for Biden, I'd like to know why they're not concerned with his "gun safety" goals. He won't actually do it, won't be as restrictive, Senate will hopefully stop it, etc.

Sorry, I meant name names. Maybe that would coax them out of hiding.

 

[CampingJosh]

You have not read into the threads deeply enough. There are more chills in here than you know.

I know you read more on here than I do, so I have to believe you. I'm just surprised to hear it.

 

[Bennettjh]

Sorry, I meant name names. Maybe that would coax them out of hiding.

Oh I'd love to. We're lucky to have these kind of threads so I'm not going to start more drama for the mods to deal with. No doubt there's plenty to dislike about Trump, BUT Biden has such a radically liberal stance on guns that it's hard to imagine him having any kind of support on a gun forum.

 

[printcraft]

Sorry, I meant name names. Maybe that would coax them out of hiding.

Kut did, but it’s alright because he didn’t even bother to read what bidet had posted on his website and talked about at every opportunity for a year concerning his plans to gut the 2nd Amendment.
He claimed to not know, which stretches credulity wafer thin.

 

[printcraft]

It’s impossible to be on this forum and NOT have heard about bidets plans on guns.
We discussed it CONSTANTLY over the last year, same for beto, bloomberg, moms who need action etc. etc.
These gun control removal nazis are talked about in multiple threads and areas here due to the threat they pose.
Anyone claiming to have a shred of concern about gun rights knew what was going on.
Anyone claiming that bidet and the democrats will be better on gun rights than President Trump and the republicans are lying.
Flat out.

 

[drillsgt]

It’s impossible to be on this forum and NOT have heard about bidets plans on guns.
We discussed it CONSTANTLY over the last year, same for beto, bloomberg, moms who need action etc. etc.
These gun control removal nazis are talked about in multiple threads and areas here due to the threat they pose.
Anyone claiming to have a shred of concern about gun rights knew what was going on.
Anyone claiming that bidet and the democrats will be better on gun rights than President Trump and the republicans are lying.
Flat out.

But, bump stocks lol

 

[foszoe]

Kut did, but it’s alright because he didn’t even bother to read what bidet had posted on his website and talked about at every opportunity for a year concerning his plans to gut the 2nd Amendment.
He claimed to not know, which stretches credulity wafer thin.

True. Paul said he would be ok with the gun agenda. Kut claimed ignorance. I usually take people at their word.

 

[foszoe]

Oh I'd love to. We're lucky to have these kind of threads so I'm not going to start more drama for the mods to deal with. No doubt there's plenty to dislike about Trump, BUT Biden has such a radically liberal stance on guns that it's hard to imagine him having any kind of support on a gun forum.

Asking specific people a question shouldn't start drama. If anything, it should begin the conversation you are wanting to have, and if not, you wouldn't have to keep asking.

 

[foszoe]

It’s impossible to be on this forum and NOT have heard about bidets plans on guns.
We discussed it CONSTANTLY over the last year, same for beto, bloomberg, moms who need action etc. etc.
These gun control removal nazis are talked about in multiple threads and areas here due to the threat they pose.
Anyone claiming to have a shred of concern about gun rights knew what was going on.
Anyone claiming that bidet and the democrats will be better on gun rights than President Trump and the republicans are lying.
Flat out.

Its spelled Biden not bidet.

 

[Alpo]

Did Trump win Indiana? If so, the arguments against voting for Biden within this state are moot.

Where is the Hunter Biden expose'? Rudy had an incredible amount of information he was going to use to PROVE Joe Biden did something to someone for some reason. Where is it?

Where are the watermarked ballots?

Where is Hugo Chavez?

You see a trend here? These topics are from a body of people who live in fear. And believe anyone who promotes stories with little to no proof.

Months have gone by. Rudy seems to be in the middle of most of these things....and we continue to get nothing burgers.

There isn't anything to debate. Fairy tales. Mostly from a little boy who cried "Wolf" far too often.