Not the Biden administration official claiming our inalienable rights come not from God but rather are given to us by the government? Not the officially sanctioned church of satan display in the Iowa (I believe) state capitol that someone was prosecuted for a hate crime for when he smashed it?
If you had been paying attention, I have made no secret of the fact that I start reading into a thread at the post where I left off, commenting as I go, thus your post you wish to reference was still in my future when I commented. I sometimes miss in thread warnings for a while because my timeline hasn't caught upChill out there old timer with your condescending bad self. What you said sounded familiar and it was basically what I was also saying in a previous post, and I made public note of it. That's all.
Edit:@BugI02
You mean more than someone loving them some Haley BECAUSE she has no path to win but is solely trying to damage the eventual republican nominee all while claiming not want Biden to win. Quite the ... umm ... 'interesting' strategy
I was talking about the Jesus and Trump images for those who worship one of the two.
She is showing 40% in states that all hold some form of open primary and it is an open secret that it is a democrat strategy to encourage their people to vote ABT. Let's see how she does in a state with a closed primary like Florida since her democrat voters will presumably need to vote for Biden
People don't understand God isn't on our side we have to be on his side.
Why? Sanctimoniously presumptive, yes. Sacrilegious? Nah. People get to believe they’re on God’s side, which, logically, would mean they also believe God is on their side. Is it disrespecting the sacred to think god could be on the side of a sinner?
A redefinition from the specific instance to the general.
You're using a lot of determiners there, that I don't know what you're referring to. I guess I'll assume you're referring to the difference between sacrilegious and presumptuous. But, you know you just asked for a long post. What follows is on you.
You say her performance was abysmal and challenged others to use logic? She landed ~40% and got wiped in the rural counties that love Trump. We can disagree about abysmal, but I don't see it as that. Nor do I see any logic or humor in your rant nor a reason she must get out now.First, fixed it for you. Second, it’s turtles all the way down. State after state will go to Trump because that's what the polling shows. Sure. Polling can be wrong. Especially when it's close. Is it close? Well, let's see. Here's 538's polling.
View attachment 335769
No. No, it's not close. She's losing major donors because she wasn't competitive in her own state. She's polling at 15.6% Trump is at 76.7%. The only places she's competitive is where Democrats can vote for her in high numbers, and that's only at county level. Of course it's absurd she's still in it. It's a joke that she's still in it. It's so absurd, it should be embarrassing for her to stay in it at this point and keep losing by such large margins.
In the other thread I challenged pro-Haley people to make the case for why Haley should still be in the race, given the polls, and especially her abysmal showing in her own state. I also jokingly asked that whoever makes the case to use some decent reasoning because I didn't feel like laughing at you. If this were your entry, you failed the challenge and I'd be forced to laugh at you.
You're basically saying that because she's at least winning a few counties that she belongs in the race? Not that DeSantis + Ramaswamy added up to a hill-o-beans, but look at that graph. Compare the bump she got with the bump Trump got when they dropped out. Looks like she couldn't even get their supporters to come to her side.
This doesn't sound like sound reasoning. 60-40 means she got owned. Where the votes come from doesn't matter. Of course the sensibilities of urban dwellers is different from rural dwellers. She'll get trounced anywhere she goes because, nation-wide, Trump voters outnumber not-Trump voters in the GOP.
See? Even you think she shouldn't be in it. Her whole strategy is to help Democrats take Trump out of the race so that she can benefit from that. It's her prerogative. It's self-serving. Which she has a right to. But should she? You've answered that with the highlighted. And yeah. That's kinda hilarious.
