Just like there was no fraud in the 2020 election yet it us being exposed. I'm sure there is major ccover up of the actual death or those that have suffered severe reactions to these vaccines. It may be exposed in time. Like in Arizona 168k fraudulent votes uncovered still people deny it happened. I wonder if pro vaccine people will deny the reports that are sure to be exposed of how deadly and disabilitating the vaccines for covid have been.Poked my head in here and immediately wished I had not.
First, I subscribe to neither tribe, so to a bunch of you, I'm labelled a "mindless believer"! Funny thing is, to the "believe the science" folks, I'm labelled an anti-Vaxxer.
First, the "believe in science" folks don't realize how ironic they are being for even saying that phrase. "Science" is the opposite of belief and "faith". It is skepticism and questioning everything... again and again, over and over, ad infinitum. "Believe in science" variously meant the world is flat, the earth is the center of the universe, Newtonian physics explains everything, and there are no particles smaller than atoms, oops, none smaller than protons/neutrons/electrons, wait...
Anyhow, you get the picture. To me, the "believe in science" and the "a poll of scientists" folks in some sense are the modern "flat earthers". (not the literal modern "flat earthers", lol)
So, kudos to ya'll for being deeply skeptical. IMO, you should be, I am, as politics and belief has infected the science institutions and made them decidedly anti-science (see climate science).
Labeling someone the equivalent of a "heretic" and guilty of "blasphemy" for being skeptical of some study means the labellor is engaged in something less than scientific rigor.
So, looking at the social media post here, my jaundiced eye applies the same skepticism. Without digging deep at all, the first red flag is that in "reporting" (it was a letter) his observations, the doctor called the mRNA vaccine(s) "gene modification therapy".
The second big red flag is that while he reports 900-1000 vaccinations in his small town, he makes no report of the COVID-positive rates at the time... as though it were un-possible that any of those 1000-ish patients were exposed to COVID prior to the vaccine administration, nor during the period of time it takes for the vaccine to become effective. He makes no mention of the outcomes for the 900-1000 patients of his that chose NOT to receive the vaccine.
Sorry, but IMO this is decidedly unserious and the flip side of the same coin as the "believe in science" mantra.
Be skeptical...
Just like the Gulf War Syndrome cover up this will be much harder because 100's of millions have gotten the vaccine.
98.2 survival rate but every government in the world is pushing the vaccines except Sweden.
