UAW On Strike

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • oze

    Mow Ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Feb 26, 2018
    3,024
    113
    Fort Wayne
    Weatern Electric employee? <raises hand>.

    Small world. I worked for Bell Labs back in the day. After the breakup, they renamed us as AT&T Technologies. I started just before the breakup was finalized. My paycheck still said Western Electric for quite some time. I was a union ho back then, lol. I quit to get a real job just before they spun us off as Lucent. They transferred my AT&T company stock into shares of Lucent, which I sold off like a dumbass. Then Nokia ended up with them.
    Where were you stationed? When I wasn't at O'Hare, I was in Naperville. In the glory days of cellular deployments, Lucent was making money faster than it could spend it. Raises and bonuses were unworldly. 2 stock splits later, we all had options to buy 400 shares at $11/share, at a time when it was trading at $84. I held onto my options until the bubble burst and they became bird cage liner.

    After surviving 27 years, one merger and 4 rounds of layoffs, the Finns finally showed me the door.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,653
    113
    Gtown-ish
    With Indiana being a Right to Work State, why would someone pay Union dues when they get the same representation as a dues paying Union member?
    I mentioned I was a union ho myself once. I didn’t have to join the union. Lets just say the union didn’t just send me a strongly worded letter saying why I should join. It was presented more like a Hobson’s choice.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,014
    113
    Mitchell
    Back in the good old days, as a salaried GM worker, we kind of cheered on whatever the UAW folks got. Whatever they’d get, we’d get something similar.

    Those were the good old days.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,653
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Where were you stationed? When I wasn't at O'Hare, I was in Naperville. In the glory days of cellular deployments, Lucent was making money faster than it could spend it. Raises and bonuses were unworldly. 2 stock splits later, we all had options to buy 400 shares at $11/share, at a time when it was trading at $84. I held onto my options until the bubble burst and they became bird cage liner.

    After surviving 27 years, one merger and 4 rounds of layoffs, the Finns finally showed me the door.
    I worked at a factory in Winston Salem NC. We made line test equipment. I worked there for only a few years.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: oze

    foszoe

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Jun 2, 2011
    16,053
    113
    I love how we just go ****ing deepend here sometimes. No one is saying all union members are lazy worthless pieces of ****. There ARE worthless pieces of **** that are union, and non union. What most of us ARE saying is that a 40% increase in salary plus a 20% reduction in work hours is just not cool. Also not cool is shutting down repair shops and body shops from being able to repair existing vehicles because you want these unrealistic things.

    But don't let me ruin your pity party.
    It's just a negotiating tactic.

    I bet most people panning on the 80/20% thing don't go car shopping or buy firearms at the asking price nor do they expect to pay the first lowball offer they make.

    Same thing to me.
     

    Rookie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    18,177
    113
    Kokomo
    It's just a negotiating tactic.

    I bet most people panning on the 80/20% thing don't go car shopping or buy firearms at the asking price nor do they expect to pay the first lowball offer they make.

    Same thing to me.
    You must be new here. This thread is about how the union is greedy and has no right to negotiate.

    Take your common sense and leave.
     

    Rookie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    18,177
    113
    Kokomo
    The strike has struck again. Ordered parts from local Chevy Dealer last week. Parts suppose the be here yesterday. Called today to inquire and yup, the strike is to blame. "Don't know when we'll see them because when the strike eventually ends, their going to be backed up with orders" I was told.

    Guess my customer that needs his vehicle to get to and from work is just gonna have to join the strike too and not work
    The first offer was garbage, minimal raises, continued abuse of temporary employees, no cost of living allowance (something that we gave up with the assurance that we would get it back when the company returned to profitability), reduced profit sharing, etc. Now, we are getting close to a contract that both parties will agree to. The only bargaining power the union has is the ability to strike. With that in mind, how would you propose settling a new contract?

    Shawn could have walked every union member which would have still affected parts. Instead, he is walking a little bit at a time. This affects their profits, but the higher profit vehicles are still being built.
     

    DirtRoadEvan

    Plinker
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Dec 20, 2020
    15
    3
    Indianapolis
    From what I have seen both sides are playing hardball. Will be interesting to see what shakes out. The job market is crazy everywhere right now.

    The winner seems to be the other non union automakers who are pushing out cars at the usual rate.
     

    Creedmoor

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 10, 2022
    6,958
    113
    Madison Co Indiana
    From what I have seen both sides are playing hardball. Will be interesting to see what shakes out. The job market is crazy everywhere right now.

    The winner seems to be the other non union automakers who are pushing out cars at the usual rate.


    If you had a choice, would you pick the perks and pay that non union auto workers get or what the Union Auto Workers get in pay and perks?
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,270
    77
    Porter County
    I think there are two kinds of companies that still pay pensions. 1) companies that **** money and can easily afford them. 2) companies that have a unionized workforce and only pay it because they have to.
    Mine is neither. If you know what the construction industry was like after the crash in 2007, you would have an idea of what USG went through. At that time it was a public company. It is now privately held by a German company called Knauf.
     

    Hookeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 19, 2011
    15,116
    77
    armpit of the midwest
    I love how we just go ****ing deepend here sometimes. No one is saying all union members are lazy worthless pieces of ****. There ARE worthless pieces of **** that are union, and non union. What most of us ARE saying is that a 40% increase in salary plus a 20% reduction in work hours is just not cool. Also not cool is shutting down repair shops and body shops from being able to repair existing vehicles because you want these unrealistic things.

    But don't let me ruin your pity party.
    Maybe a body shop would do better if they only did kia and hyundai?
     

    yeti rider

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 95%
    19   1   0
    Dec 17, 2011
    560
    28
    Lafayette
    It looks like you won't be able to say that after the dust settles. All three have agree to reinstating cola.
    Good for them, but I think it's crap. The big three are lucky that they offer big trucks and big SUV's the Americans clamor for. If it weren't for those two products alone, they would have nothing to offer that you can't get elsewhere (probably with less quality problems).
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,396
    113
    Merrillville
    It looks like you won't be able to say that after the dust settles. All three have agree to reinstating cola.
    Only because of a fight.

    The next contract never involved the company saying, "well you guys helped us out and gave up x y z, so we'll start by putting that on the table."
     

    Rookie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    18,177
    113
    Kokomo
    Only because of a fight.

    The next contract never involved the company saying, "well you guys helped us out and gave up x y z, so we'll start by putting that on the table."
    No argument from me. So, who is at fault? The union for standing up or the company for not keeping their word?

    CEO Mary Barra started negotiations by stating that cola would never come back. Yet, here we are...
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,270
    77
    Porter County
    Only because of a fight.

    The next contract never involved the company saying, "well you guys helped us out and gave up x y z, so we'll start by putting that on the table."
    It seems like union shops tend to have a much more antagonistic relationship between management and workers.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,396
    113
    Merrillville
    It seems like union shops tend to have a much more antagonistic relationship between management and workers.
    I agree.
    But when you look at some of the conditions that caused the unions to form in many of these places...

    Then again, I've had managers happy when the union pushed a safety issue, because they (the managers) were being ignored by their bosses.
    Had instances with brand new low level managers trying to show everyone who is in charge.
    And when the grievance meeting happens, and the mid level manager finds out what happened, it gets thrown out.. by management, that was only aware of the problem because of the union.


    Don't get me wrong, I hated a lot of the union stuff. Especially the us/them stuff.
    But there's no way I'd have worked where I did without it.


    I still remember being told by a manager, that I didn't need fall protection, if I DIDN'T FALL.
    And to GET UP THERE RIGHT NOW!@!! OR ELSE!!!!".
     
    Top Bottom