Trump, Clinton or Third Party

[hoosierdoc]

3 will vote for the Hildabeast.........Really.
I truly hope they are just trolls

it was 4-2 in quick voting. Glad only one more popped up

 

[ghitch75]

3 for Hitlery......really???...

 

[raptrbreth]

Forgot a "Anyone but Hillary" option.

 

[BGDave]

No option to vote for Bernie? Why do you hate free stuff?

Wasted my vote on a third party before, never again, especially when the stakes are so high (SCOTUS).

THIS, in spades. Breaking my self imposed rule on political forum participation because this is of upmost importance.

 

[2A_Tom]

I have to vote for the viable GOP nominee running against whichever liberal/progressive/socialist is running for the Dems.

If there is a third party, I hope it is Bernie.

 

[BigBoxaJunk]

I just barely remember the 1968 election. I was in Kindergarten and my elementary school was having it's own vote. We were walking to school one morning and one of the older kids was asking who we wanted to vote for and was writing it down.

One kid told me I should vote for George Wallace, since he was going to make all the black people go and live in one place together.

I didn't know what "throwing your vote away" meant, but I still voted for Richard Nixon (that's who my big brother voted for and I did everything he did)

 

[2A_Tom]

• Donald Trump
  
  
  3867.86%
• Hillary Clinton
  
  
  35.36%
• Unnamed thrid party candidate
  
  
  1526.79%
• 
  According to this Hillary will win.
  
  Figuring that she will automatically get 47% we will have an entrenched liberal Supreme Court for the rest of our lives.

 

[Lowe0]

Killary

Hildabeast

Hitlery

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Alinsky's rules, it seems, are alive and well on both sides.

 

[churchmouse]

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Alinsky's rules, it seems, are alive and well on both sides.

With out the humor this would be so unbearable.
To call her out as to who she truly is I would have to ban myself.
Billery seems to fit as to the fact they are 2 peas in the same pod.
So calling Trump all the names that the left levels on him is "OK"....??

 

[rob63]

I will hold my nose and vote for Trump as things stand now, but I'm not losing sleep over it because I just don't think it matters. Hillary is going to win.

However, if the "unnamed 3rd party candidate" was someone I could live with, and actually had a chance at winning I could be persuaded to go that route. I'm just not sure there is a candidate that could unite enough of the disaffected Republicans and the disaffected Democrats to produce a winning candidate. It seems pretty unlikely. I hope I am wrong about that, because the only way Hillary doesn't win is for there to be a candidate available that puts traditional Democrat states in play.

If you look at the states Obama won last time, and keep in mind he won by over 100 electoral votes, how many are likely to switch from blue to red or 3rd party? I just don't see a way enough of them switch to stop Hillary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ElectoralCollege2012.svg

 

[Lowe0]

With out the humor this would be so unbearable.
To call her out as to who she truly is I would have to ban myself.
Billery seems to fit as to the fact they are 2 peas in the same pod.
So calling Trump all the names that the left levels on him is "OK"....??

I explicitly pointed out that both sides were doing it. Did you read the post, or just reply to what you imagine I said instead?

 

[2A_Tom]

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Alinsky's rules, it seems, are alive and well on both sides.

With out the humor this would be so unbearable.
To call her out as to who she truly is I would have to ban myself.
Billery seems to fit as to the fact they are 2 peas in the same pod.
So calling Trump all the names that the left levels on him is "OK"....??

Originally Posted by bmbutch
Killary

Originally Posted by churchmouse
Hildabeast

Originally Posted by ghitch75
Hitlery

I explicitly pointed out that both sides were doing it. Did you read the post, or just reply to what you imagine I said instead?

You explicitly pointed out three examples against Hillary. The point seemed implied. I may be mistaken but it seems that you have a liberal bent.

I for one am NEVER HILLARY!

 

[Thor]

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Alinsky's rules, it seems, are alive and well on both sides.

Apparently, that's a manual you are familiar with.

 

[jamil]

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
Alinsky's rules, it seems, are alive and well on both sides.

You've mischaracterized angst as tactics.

 

[wagyu52]

I have to vote for the viable GOP nominee running against whichever liberal/progressive/socialist is running for the Dems.

If there is a third party, I hope it is Bernie.

I'm thinking this is a real possibility as Bernie has been/is an Independent.

 

[femurphy77]

Trump's a psycho but look at Clinton's eyes; there's evil in there just waiting to be unleashed. It's almost like they'd glow in the dark if you were unfortunate enough to be in a position to see them.

 

[Lowe0]

You've mischaracterized angst as tactics.

If the outcome is the same, does the reason behind it matter? Alinsky's rules were about aligning others' angst in a single coherent direction.

 

[JettaKnight]

Forgot a "Anyone but Hillary" option.

We tried the "anyone but Trump" option in the primary.

 

[chipbennett]

I've already gone on record stating that I would vote for Satan himself if it prevented Hillary from being elected.

 

[1775usmarine]

Make America sick again vote Alice Cooper 2016.