I don't buy that article at all. Thats happens to be alot more info than any media has stated that china has said. I have fire tv service and watch alot of over seas news to see what's happening over there. I had only seen 1 uk channel that had said something along the lines that China regrets what has happened. We all know that the media adds false info and such just to get rating. The government needs to give us closeup pics of the hardware, markings and other stuff on that setup. There stuff we aren't being told, otherwise we would have those closeup pics of it. Until i see actual proof, i will continue my position about it.Blinken postpones China trip amid spy balloon row; US officials scramble to get rid of it
Blinken postpones China trip; Chinese government denies that a balloon flying over Montana is a spycraft as U.S. officials scramble to get rid of it.www.usatoday.com
China disputed that characterization, calling it a “civilian airship” that blew off course.
Right.
Why would we call it Chinese?
After all, the Chinese are calling it Chinese.
100% correct.
And it has nothing to do with faith in the government. It's about having a grasp on reality.
Here's three international stories to start. Feel free to use the search engine of your choice to find more.I don't buy that article at all. Thats happens to be alot more info than any media has stated that china has said. I have fire tv service and watch alot of over seas news to see what's happening over there. I had only seen 1 uk channel that had said something along the lines that China regrets what has happened. We all know that the media adds false info and such just to get rating. The government needs to give us closeup pics of the hardware, markings and other stuff on that setup. There stuff we aren't being told, otherwise we would have those closeup pics of it. Until i see actual proof, i will continue my position about it.
The payload is that size. I wonder just how freakin big the balloon itself is.The balloon is probably that size , the payload shouldn’t be anywhere near that big.
See above. Payload is the size of 2-3 buses.If the balloon is about 30' across I suspect the payload is the size of a shoe box or smaller. Not a whole lot you can do with that, especially if it is at 60,000' altitude. Temperature is well below freezing and ultra violet is pretty high. People that launch home made rockets that high feel lucky their cameras last for a few minutes. I cannot believe any battery would be functional for the time it took to get to the U.S., I would think any biologic would die instantly if released at that altitude, if not already dead from being frozen for several days.
Infected water bears?Anything that survives from that high up to the ground exposed to the elements is sci fi to the max, not to mention there'd be a lot simpler ways to send a pathogen given how much shipping and other commercial traffic we share.
The payload is that size. I wonder just how freakin big the balloon itself is.
See above. Payload is the size of 2-3 buses.
Infected water bears?
Tardigrade | Facts & Lifespan
Tardigrade, any of more than 1,100 species of tiny invertebrates that make up the phylum Tardigrada. These tiny creatures are considered to be close relatives of arthropods, and they live in a variety of habitats worldwide. They are known for their ability to withstand extremely low...www.britannica.com
Glad you got a night off and it's always good to discuss the issues with you BBI. I checked the local news earlier, looks like the criminal element didn't get the "take a night off" memo. Michigan and Holt? I drive through there twice a day.Yeah, I'm off tonight.
Personally I'm leery of connecting dots just because they are on the same page and I am also not keen on taking things at first glance as truth, but I'm also well out of my league and just asking questions at this point.
I think we read the same book.View attachment 252746
Clearest picture so far from a photographer in Montana, I believe.
The first one? I might be able to buy that story, while shaking my head that I think it should have been handled differently.
The second one (and most likely more to come)? Yeah, in the business we call that “hinky,” and something is definitely afoot.
I will happily admit that I’m as much of a conspiracy analyst as most of us these days, so I’m pretty proud that I thought of this yesterday when I heard of the second balloon. This is what I sent my friend:
“Supposedly there is a second balloon now, although I don't know where it is currently, I'm just hearing chatter. What if both balloons are carrying nukes to be used as high altitude detonations for EMPs? The first balloon starts drifting over the Dakotas and then moving south towards the Chicago area, the second balloon follows a similar trajectory from Canada and moves down towards the Denver Area… And then when they are in the correct locations, subs off of both coasts launch their nukes over each seaboard? An attack like that would be very plausible because it would take a whole lot less time for a missile to travel from offshore to just inland than it would take to go to the center of the country, thus it would be a whole lot easier to track and shoot down. Right now, We are just letting enemy craft float through our airspace”
I'm thinking of the Streak Eagle from the 70s (no paint to save weight) that set all kinds of climb-records. I knew we knocked a satellite down with an Eagle, didn't realize it was when I was in DEP.
Edwards AFB tail markings, not sure I can see the tail number but I'll bet it was an A-Model.
Edit: looks like a 76 on the tail number, that's an A-Model. F-15C-Models came out in 1979 IIRC.
You must be on their ‘good’ list.I heard a noise and found this in my back yard just minutes ago. Not sure what to make of it.
View attachment 252720