PART 2: I'm new an your 50-post rule sucks! Please change it for my convenience.

[bobzilla]

i really think you guys should give them at least 24 hours before the Hammer, some of us with no life need the entertainment

I mean, they only banned him because he thinks different and is smarter than us.

 

[Lpherr]

I mean, they only banned him because he thinks different and is smarter than us.

The .gov will protect his rights.

 

[KellyinAvon]

Of all the days to go to Terre Haute and miss out on the fun. Looks like Cm was the only staff available and he took care of business.

For the record: we (the staff) NEVER ban someone for a difference of opinion. Having differing opinions and expressing them is why we come here.

As far as why we ban people from the forum... there are rules here (THIS AIN'T NAM!!)

 

[littletommy]

I always find it's best to eliminate anyone who disagrees with the group or who has some other point of view. I like my forums to be as narrow-minded, uneducated, and ignorant as possible, and those outside views and comments about thinking really interfere. Right?

I feel exactly the same way! Thinking is for chumps!

 

[KellyinAvon]

I always find it's best to eliminate anyone who disagrees with the group or who has some other point of view. I like my forums to be as narrow-minded, uneducated, and ignorant as possible, and those outside views and comments about thinking really interfere. Right?

We'll call this, Exhibit A. This isn't a difference of opinion, it's insulting members.

 

[JettaKnight]

We'll call this, Exhibit A. This isn't a difference of opinion, it's insulting members.

You'll get beat up for having a differing view on gun rights, but you won't get banned on INGO.

However, those with a widely different view seem more likely to self destruct

 

[KellyinAvon]

You'll get beat up for having a differing view on gun rights, but you won't get banned on INGO.

However, those with a widely different view seem more likely to self destruct

That does seem to be a trend. If you keep it together? You can keep on keepin on. Implosion? Not so much.

 

[2A_Tom]

@AndreusMaximus

Just checking back Andreus.

Seems like you took a severe beating over a difference of opinion, took it, developed a thick skin and have become a contributing member.

Kudos, and .

Jus kiddin'

 

[ditcherman]

@AndreusMaximus

Just checking back Andreus.

Seems like you took a severe beating over a difference of opinion, took it, developed a thick skin and have become a contributing member.

Kudos, and .

Jus kiddin'

Maybe if you would have compromised a little…

 

[bobzilla]

Of all the days to go to Terre Haute and miss out on the fun. Looks like Cm was the only staff available and he took care of business.

For the record: we (the staff) NEVER ban someone for a difference of opinion. Having differing opinions and expressing them is why we come here.

As far as why we ban people from the forum... there are rules here (THIS AIN'T NAM!!)

You don’t need to tell us. We already knew. Now, there was a time that it happened but it’s been a long time and this place is not that place anymore.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

That does seem to be a trend. If you keep it together? You can keep on keepin on. Implosion? Not so much.

Maybe he'll come back...

 

[deo62]

More like Ground control to major Tom

 

[Mij]

I always find it's best to eliminate anyone who disagrees with the group or who has some other point of view. I like my forums to be as narrow-minded, uneducated, and ignorant as possible, and those outside views and comments about thinking really interfere. Right?

Narrow minded, check
Uneducated, check check
ignorant as possible, triple check

Yet here I am……. And you ain’t. Go figger

 

[Cameramonkey]

We'll call this, Exhibit A. This isn't a difference of opinion, it's insulting members.

I was willing to let that slide. I love it when they outright say "you'll ban me for my views, not for breaking rules"

And then they call somebody a dbag because their views were challenged. That's a rule breakin.

And I had invited the kid to the INGO shoot minutes before via PM as part of a larger message. As far as I'm concerned, the invite still stands if he takes the 3 days to chill and be respectful. I think he could learn a lot out there.

 

[Max Volume]

I sometimes wonder if certain runners are actually anti gun and are trying to show proof how easy it is to buy a firearm.
Kind of like some politicians who have seen one for sale on the internet and think they can just pay the money and get it delivered
to their doorstep. Naw, couldn't be.

 

[stocknup]

He must be quite the treat to work next to or to have as an employee ..................

 

[bobzilla]

He must be quite the treat to work next to or to have as an employee ..................

I’m sure I’ve worked with (his kind) before.

 

[Expat]

Surely we can all agree....

 

[stocknup]

Surely we can all agree....

Surely ..............now since the one who could not agree is no longer here to disagree

 

[bobzilla]

Surely we can all agree....

Nope. I refuse. I guess I have to get banned now.











I keed I keed. I still wanna be Kelly’s driver