They were probably thinking of monkey pox..."Pubic" health emergency?
Is that a typo or a Freudian slip?
They were probably thinking of monkey pox..."Pubic" health emergency?
Is that a typo or a Freudian slip?
You seem like a reasonable facsimile of a personI am apparently a bot. I can’t get past the capcha.
What Happens When COVID-19 Emergency Declarations End? Implications for Coverage, Costs, and Access | KFF
This brief provides an overview of the major health-related COVID-19 federal emergency declarations that have been made since early on in the pandemic, summarizes the flexibilities triggered by each, and identifies the implications for their ending, related to coverage, costs, and payment for...www.kff.org
It's myocarditis season
Well, maybe > $100B had something to do with it too.Not to my knowledge, no.
I haven't seen - but also haven't looked. Got kind of burned out on all-vaccines-all-the-time, and thankfully, my client work took me in other directions, mostly, over the past year or so.
I don't think anyone will ever convince me it was anything other than a political decision, particularly the push to mandate, guilt-trip, cajole, and otherwise force/influence the masses to take the vaccine.
Well it's a start.....
Myocarditis caused by Covid vaccine led to Dunedin man's death - coroner
Rory Nairn died at home, nearly two weeks after getting his first dose of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.www.1news.co.nz
…and systemic racism.That's because global warming changed the vaccines once they were administered.
How many people were injected with mrna medical products before the scamdemic?There are decades of data on mRNA as a delivery mechanism for other payloads. At the same time, there's clearly an issue with the mRNA Covid vaccine. It may be something unique to delivering the spike protein RNA via mRNA. It may be something about mRNA itself. (Though, I suspect it is the Frankenvirus rather than the delivery method.)
Do you have the same trust in the global warming data, as you had in the vax data? It's data after all. If not, why not?And I can only ever evaluate the data that are presented. The problem is that the data being presented today were available then, and had we been presented today's data then, the evaluation would have been much different.
I think it's worse than unethical economics.Personally, I think it was more sinister than that. This appeared to me to be a giant kickback for political favors. (Maybe that makes me a conspiracy theorist...)