I don't think he disputed the fact he liked beer back then, or even now. In fact, he stated it quite clearly several times, and even the fact that he drank too much sometimes.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings
- Thread starter historian
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I wouldn't do anything you're saying.
If I'm innocent I'm sure as hell not gonna spoon feed them into an FBI investigation into me. Its worthless anyways.
But still, after he would be found not guilty, the Democrats will say hes the only scotus nominee to be under investigation. It will never be good enough for them and they will always be dirty about it. This is a bunch of BS. I think doctor ford is lying. I do not believe her at all. I do not believe she has ever been a victim. I believe she is a political hack and this is a carefully planned and staged deep democrat conspiracy. I've never believed it more than I do today.
We have congressmen and women and senators who have done FAR worse than he is being falsely accused of, yet they still sit inCongress. It is a hypocritical outrage.
.
Anyways kut just because people do not surrender their rights doesnt mean they are guilty. If someone pleads the 5th it doesnt mean they are guilty. If someone invokes their right to remain silent with a cop they arent guilty. We are innocent until PROVEN guilty in a court of law and a Senate committee certainly isnt that
Also, context is everything.
Things you did as a kid, when put into text on paper, look a lot worse than they actually were.
And even worse when those things are being read back to you by a committee. There's no way to put any of it into context.
Things you did as a kid, when put into text on paper, look a lot worse than they actually were.
And even worse when those things are being read back to you by a committee. There's no way to put any of it into context.
Yeah they always do this. This is how they pout when they dont get their way and then they claim to be social justice warriors for truth.
Would anyone here want to be judged as an adult by things we did as kids?
Hell even most courts do not judge minors as adults nor do those charges follow them into adulthood.
This is a sham
Hell even most courts do not judge minors as adults nor do those charges follow them into adulthood.
This is a sham
Sen. Leahy: "The only person who has claimed this incident didn't happen is Brett Kavanaugh. The others said they have no knowledge or memory of it."
Opposite also true. Ford is the only one claiming it did happen.
And Leahy's inaccurate. Kavanaugh didn't say it didn't happen. He said he didn't do it.
I think word choice during this whole thing was probably carefully planned. If it happened, there's probably someone that knows who did it, and doesn't necessarily want or need to volunteer that information.
Again, I don't think either side of the Judiciary committee wants to know who did it if it wasn't Kavanaugh... possibly because it's irrelevant to his nomination.
D's don't want it to be anyone else.
R's don't want it to delay the process further.
Opposite also true. Ford is the only one claiming it did happen.
And Leahy's inaccurate. Kavanaugh didn't say it didn't happen. He said he didn't do it.
I think word choice during this whole thing was probably carefully planned. If it happened, there's probably someone that knows who did it, and doesn't necessarily want or need to volunteer that information.
Again, I don't think either side of the Judiciary committee wants to know who did it if it wasn't Kavanaugh... possibly because it's irrelevant to his nomination.
D's don't want it to be anyone else.
R's don't want it to delay the process further.
indiucky
Grandmaster
indiucky
Grandmaster
Yeah...We had a name for those people...Designated Drivers.....
No. Worse yet to be judged for things you didn't do as a kid.
I know this one guy who used to make 2 liter bombs (no shrapnel) and set them off all over his college campus at night (noise, no property damage) just to freak people out.....think of how that guy would be treated today.
Demoncrats (snicker) should give this a read...
https://www.clipsnation.com/2015/2/21/8080937/intentional-fouls-off-the-ball-not-effective-not-smart-not-basketball
https://www.clipsnation.com/2015/2/21/8080937/intentional-fouls-off-the-ball-not-effective-not-smart-not-basketball
indiucky
Grandmaster
Exactly.
And if I was falsely accused of something this evil and have had my lifes work and my family threatened, I would have behaved exactly like judge Kavenaugh did yesterday. I would be iterate at even the insinuation that I did this and I would be annoyed that i even had to go through a process on it.
.
In today's snowflake world they would treat that student like the unibomber lol
Also having 2018, #MeToo standards of what is and is not "sexual assault" applied to your alleged actions as a kid in the early 1980s.
Adam Carolla addressed this in his podcast the other day- brilliantly.
