Greenwood mall shooting

[MinuteManMike]

View attachment 212533

How do I get that shirt???

 

[MRockwell]

**** that piece of ****.

Maybe we should ask that ***** why he vetoed a billl removimg infringements upon the natural right to defense.

I see it as a big ****-YOU, middle-finger-to-the-face of the piece of **** that tried all he could to block Constitutional Carry. And maybe his ***** Doug Carter could be there to share in the humility.

And I agree... **** that piece of **** little *****.

 

[MinuteManMike]

Feel bad for Mr. Gomez. You come around a corner and you're staring at a rifle. He probably didn't even have time to realize what was happening.

The bad guys almost always get to pick how the encounters start. RIP, sir.

 

[Ingomike]

will Eli be invited to the White House?

Yes! In Trumps next term…

 

[singlestacksig]

How on earth is this a hate crime? Because the people killed all had Spanish names? Couldn't it be that the people killed happened to be the closest/easiest targets? Like Gomez, it sounds like he was right there. Not much worse than a religion of woke zealot.

it was right at the Mexican food place....

 

[jagibbons]

I wouldn't want to see that scumbag Holcomb anywhere near Eli. That scumbag would surely like to use it to get votes.

Holcomb is term limited, although he has considered a run for senator.

 

[chipbennett]

Do we know if the shooter had a LTCH? They said he went to Range USA frequently. He did have a handgun.

Initial reporting was that he has an LTCH. Subsequent reporting was that he did not, and was lawfully carrying under constitutional carry.

Guy Relford initially posted the initial reporting that he had an LTCH. To my knowledge, he has not clarified or otherwise stated one way or another, since being retained as Dicken's counsel.

 

[Yup!]

Initial reporting was that he has an LTCH. Subsequent reporting was that he did not, and was lawfully carrying under constitutional carry.

Guy Relford initially posted the initial reporting that he had an LTCH. To my knowledge, he has not clarified or otherwise stated one way or another, since being retained as Dicken's counsel.

No - I’m asking about the dead shooter.

 

[Keith_Indy]

Initial reporting was that he has an LTCH. Subsequent reporting was that he did not, and was lawfully carrying under constitutional carry.

Guy Relford initially posted the initial reporting that he had an LTCH. To my knowledge, he has not clarified or otherwise stated one way or another, since being retained as Dicken's counsel.

From Guy Relfords Facebook page...

 

[KG1]

Initial reporting was that he has an LTCH. Subsequent reporting was that he did not, and was lawfully carrying under constitutional carry.

Guy Relford initially posted the initial reporting that he had an LTCH. To my knowledge, he has not clarified or otherwise stated one way or another, since being retained as Dicken's counsel.

I think in this case he's talking about the deceased subhuman that Eli took out who's rotting in hell right now.

 

[Yup!]

I think in this case he's talking about the deceased subhuman that Eli took out who's rotting in hell right now.

Yup. Him.

 

[nagantoid]

Clean up aisle 4, clean-up aisle 4, watch your step!

I wonder what PeeWee Herman is doing with himself these days...
OK, I'll get back on topic now.

 

[chipbennett]

Those are live rounds. One of the rounds he took to the chest went through one of the mags on his chest, spilling a bunch of live rounds.

Not surprising, since we know that 9mm will blow an entire lung out of the body.

 

[chipbennett]

No - I’m asking about the dead shooter.

Out of curiosity: why would it matter? He had no record, and no apparent/obvious disqualifiers. And while he possessed a handgun, he only used the rifle - the possession of which is not impacted by an LTCH requirement.

 

[chipbennett]

From Guy Relfords Facebook page...

View attachment 212581

Awesome. So, the subsequent reporting that he was carrying "under Indiana's constitutional carry law" were incorrect. (Gee; I'm surprised. )

 

[Yup!]

Out of curiosity: why would it matter? He had no record, and no apparent/obvious disqualifiers. And while he possessed a handgun, he only used the rifle - the possession of which is not impacted by an LTCH requirement.

He purchased the long gun in March of 2021 and another in 2022. So this wasn't an impulse purchase and shoot. He did have a handgun. He frequented the range they said. So I'm curious if back in 2021 when he bought the rifle if he also thought about getting his LTCH. I dont know when/how he acquired the pistol since he isn't 21, and I know LTCH is not required to purchase, but was trying to understand his interest in firearms over the last year or so. More curiosity than anything.

 

[HoughMade]

Awesome. So, the subsequent reporting that he was carrying "under Indiana's constitutional carry law" were incorrect. (Gee; I'm surprised. )

I guess I'm surprised that I haven't heard reporters saying that the killer criminal was carrying under the Constitutional Carry law...but I'm sure it's either out there or coming.

 

[Yup!]

I guess I'm surprised that I haven't heard reporters saying that the killer criminal was carrying under the Constitutional Carry law...but I'm sure it's either out there or coming.

I’ve heard them say it. Something to the effect of - walking into a the mall with 2 rifles, a handgun and 100 rounds is perfectly legal and the only thing he did that was illegal was point/shoot.

 

[DCowboysCR]

On the CCW Reddit there’s a leaked photo of the shooter after he’s been killed.

 

[hamiltonrrwatch]

Haven’t seen this benefit mentioned. Future nut bag mass shooters, and there will be more, may avoid Indiana and possibly other constitutional carry states because of this.

Not to mention your average Chicago retards. We had a few city rats come down into South Region looking for carjack possibilities.

***k Around Status?
Found out.