Gr666mer Updates

[DragonGunner]

Lonnie Frisbee said these people (gays) can’t reproduce. So they must recruit.
I just saw Glenn Beck show where after a passage of a bill to protect children from being mutilated by their parents that protester in the chamber started cursing and cussing them. It was in KY. They were called murderers….?

 

[KLB]

Lonnie Frisbee said these people (gays) can’t reproduce. So they must recruit.

That is pure ignorance.

 

[HoosierLife]

That is pure ignorance.

Which part?

 

[DragonGunner]

That is pure ignorance.

I disagree 100% That sick community has infeltrated the education system, the political system the entertainment system all to recruit children. They can’t reproduce.

 

[oze]

That is pure ignorance.

True. Because they can adopt. No matter where you fall on the nature/nurture continuum, being raised by gay parents, in an environment in which being gay is the norm is going to influence on self-identifiation.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I disagree 100% That sick community has infeltrated the education system, the political system the entertainment system all to recruit children. They can’t reproduce.

There are technicalities that allow them to “reproduce”, that is obtain children but 2 committed homosexuals, through the natural processes God created, cannot reproduce.

 

[Shadow01]

This doesn’t happen under home schooling

 

[DragonGunner]

There are technicalities that allow them to “reproduce”, that is obtain children but 2 committed homosexuals, through the natural processes God created, cannot reproduce.

That is such a small % that “reproduce” isn’t it. And adopting I would add isn’t reproducing. I did not know this would go over some heads. Lonnie said this in 1993. He said much more which is spot on. He was recruited at age 8 by the gay babysitter who raped him. I’ll listen to his wisdom since he went through it. For somebody to argue that a man can be a woman through surgery and reproduce a child they hope to recruit into being gay and using that to argue “that’s 100% ignorance” is just plain ignorant to me.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

That is such a small % that “reproduce” isn’t it. And adopting I would add isn’t reproducing. I did not know this would go over some heads. Lonnie said this in 1993. He said much more which is spot on. He was recruited at age 8 by the gay babysitter who raped him. I’ll listen to his wisdom since he went through it. For somebody to argue that a man can be a woman through surgery and reproduce a child they hope to recruit into being gay and using that to argue “that’s 100% ignorance” is just plain ignorant to me.

It’s part of the gas-lighting we see in America. My biblical worldview side reminds me of the part in the garden when the serpent temped Eve by twisting God’s word by asking “…did God say…”

We know what the truth is. The spirit of this age is all about blurring it and corrupting it. Can homosexuals “have children”? Yes, they can obtain them. They can adopt, they can artificially insemenate (sp?), they can fornicate outside of their homosexual relationship, etc...etc…. But they cannot reproduce, everything else is gas-lighting.

 

[maxipum]

That is pure ignorance.

Really ?? Big science guy huh?

 

[KLB]

Which part?

You know which part, but I obviously was referring to the belief that the only way that someone could be gay is to be recruited.

 

[KLB]

That is such a small % that “reproduce” isn’t it. And adopting I would add isn’t reproducing. I did not know this would go over some heads. Lonnie said this in 1993. He said much more which is spot on. He was recruited at age 8 by the gay babysitter who raped him. I’ll listen to his wisdom since he went through it. For somebody to argue that a man can be a woman through surgery and reproduce a child they hope to recruit into being gay and using that to argue “that’s 100% ignorance” is just plain ignorant to me.

You're being willfully ignorant. Reproducing has nothing to do with being gay. Then saying that since they can't pass on being gay genetically means that they have to recruit for there to be more is ridiculous.

For the record, gays can and do have children. I have a friend that was married for something like 15 years with two kids before he chose to quit hiding.

 

[maxipum]

You know which part, but I obviously was referring to the belief that the only way that someone could be gay is to be recruited.

I understand what you are saying.

 

[jamil]

You're being willfully ignorant. Reproducing has nothing to do with being gay. Then saying that since they can't pass on being gay genetically means that they have to recruit for there to be more is ridiculous.

For the record, gays can and do have children. I have a friend that was married for something like 15 years with two kids before he chose to quit hiding.

Is that what he's saying? If it is, yeah. Maybe that's ignorance.

There are a lot of conflicting studies on the heritability of homosexuality. It's a subject more influenced by politics than even climate change. Like the recent study that proclaimed there isn't a gay gene or a straight gene. Even if true that doesn't mean it's not heritable at all. This study suggests that it is at least a little genetic.

Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior - PubMed

Twin and family studies have shown that same-sex sexual behavior is partly genetically influenced, but previous searches for specific genes involved have been underpowered. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 477,522 individuals, revealing five loci significantly associated...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Does that mean that if gays don't reproduce that eventually no one will be gay? That's nonsense. But I suspect that if you don't believe evolution it might be easier to believe that. I suspect that homosexuality is at least a little nature, and at least a little nurture. I suspect that if there is a gay gene pretty much everyone has it, but a number of factors would need to line up to make a person gay. So there's no breading it out of human behavior.

But, none of that really has anything to do with the politicization of sexual deviance.

 

[printcraft]

True. Because they can adopt. No matter where you fall on the nature/nurture continuum, being raised by gay parents, in an environment in which being gay is the norm is going to influence on self-identifiation.

Adoption is not biological reproduction. Full stop.

 

[printcraft]

You're being willfully ignorant. Reproducing has nothing to do with being gay. Then saying that since they can't pass on being gay genetically means that they have to recruit for there to be more is ridiculous.

For the record, gays can and do have children. I have a friend that was married for something like 15 years with two kids before he chose to quit hiding.

Irrelevant.

Yes, well see, there is a big distinction missing in the equation.

Still takes a biological male and biological female to reproduce somewhere along the line.

Pete buttjudge didn’t reproduce with his husband.

 

[DragonGunner]

You know which part, but I obviously was referring to the belief that the only way that someone could be gay is to be recruited.

But you’re gaslighting what I said. Where did I say that was the only way to be gay. You saw what you wanted to see like typical narcissist ignorant of facts would say. Then trying to build an argument out of it and reframe it. Sorry that dog ain’t hunting but nice try.

 

[jamil]

Are you guys arguing past each other? What use is the point of trying to say gays can’t reproduce. Obvious babies can’t be made through same sex ****ing.

Is the purpose of saying that pursuant to the idea that gays cannot reproduce so they have to indoctrinate other people’s offspring to make more gays? Or to make more progressives? I’d agree with the latter. The former is ignorant because straight couples produce some offspring who turn out gay. But then I’s not clear to me that this is even an argument anyone is forwarding here.

 

[jamil]

But you’re gaslighting what I said. Where did I say that was the only way to be gay. You saw what you wanted to see like typical narcissist ignorant of facts would say. Then trying to build an argument out of it and reframe it. Sorry that dog ain’t hunting but nice try.

Idunno. Why assume he’s trying to reframe it? Maybe he just misunderstands what you were getting at.

 

[oze]

Adoption is not biological reproduction. Full stop.

But the end result is the same. Full semicolon.