Gr666mer Updates

[printcraft]

It’s not gonna affect trans and queer people if they don’t molest children. Pedo’s should be kinda scared though. Pedos too scared to molest children is a societal benefit.

Pedo's are a much much much much much much higher than average overlap in that "community".

 

[Cameramonkey]

Pedo's are a much much much much much much higher than average overlap in that "community".

News to me. Source? I’m genuinely curious.

 

[printcraft]

As a percentage of population.

 

[manifest destiny]

View attachment 329048

The admission is helpful.

I don't think "Penny" recognizes the implications of "Penny's" reply.
It's a staggering amount of myopia from "Penny".

 

[actaeon277]

Well... since post surgery suicides seem to match pre surgery suicides.. her argument seems moot.

 

[2tonic]

Well, they keep telling us that being gay or trans doesn't mean you are a pedo, so what is she worried about. This only affects pedos.
Doesn't this come under the umbrella of their position that "if you have nothing to hide, you needn't worry about government intrusion into your life"?

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Well, they keep telling us that being gay or trans doesn't mean you are a pedo, so what is she worried about. This only affects pedos.
Doesn't this come under the umbrella of their position that "if you have nothing to hide, you needn't worry about government intrusion into your life"?

I think every manner of perversion has come to be accepted under their "tent".

 

[Cameramonkey]

I think every manner of perversion has come to be accepted under their "tent".

Yes. See “Minor Attracted Persons” as an example.

I wo see when they go from acceptance as a fellow minority to adding the M to the label of LGBT…?

 

[jamil]

News to me. Source? I’m genuinely curious.

Well this is interesting.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/

 

[Cameramonkey]

Well this is interesting.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/

Thank you for a real source, sir. I prefer that over conjecture, even if I suspect conjecture is correct.

 

[foszoe]

Well this is interesting.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/

It would possibly be, but I saw .gov and know it's not true.

 

[jamil]

It would possibly be, but I saw .gov and know it's not true.

C'mon. It's pubmed.

 

[jamil]

There's a similar study about priests that suggests that the standard explanation may not have it right. The high instances of pedo Catholic priests is usually explained by homosexuals joining the priesthood because of the celibacy rule. Of course this is an admission that homosexuals tend to be pedos at a higher rate than heterosexuals. I mean if homosexuals join the priesthood at a higher rate, why wouldn't they just **** other gay priests? Why the preference for alter boys? The study kinda flips that hypothysis. The priesthood's celibacy rule may have a causal effect. The priesthood turns them pedo. Not sure I buy that one either. I think the priests who turn out to be pedos were pedos before they joined the priesthood.

 

[Cameramonkey]

There's a similar study about priests that suggests that the standard explanation may not have it right. The high instances of pedo Catholic priests is usually explained by homosexuals joining the priesthood because of the celibacy rule. Of course this is an admission that homosexuals tend to be pedos at a higher rate than heterosexuals. I mean if homosexuals join the priesthood at a higher rate, why wouldn't they just **** other gay priests? Why the preference for alter boys? The study kinda flips that hypothysis. The priesthood's celibacy rule may have a causal effect. The priesthood turns them pedo. Not sure I buy that one either. I think the priests who turn out to be pedos were pedos before they joined the priesthood.

Nah, its that excessive reverence paid to Mary that does it.

 

[foszoe]

The priesthood's celibacy rule may have a causal effect. The priesthood turns them pedo. Not sure I buy that one either. I think the priests who turn out to be pedos were pedos before they joined the priesthood.

As an agnostic, you will probably not accept the premise, but the devil fights the hardest against those trying to sincerely imitate Christ the most. So I COULD see it that way. Not saying I do but I COULD.

 

[jamil]

As an agnostic, you will probably not accept the premise, but the devil fights the hardest against those trying to sincerely imitate Christ the most. So I COULD see it that way. Not saying I do but I COULD.

So the pedo priests aren't pedos before they join the priesthood? What are you saying?

I mean. Sometimes natural causes explain things better than supernatural causes. Well. Nevermind. I don't want this to become a religious discussion. Let's just see if we can agree that the instance of pedos in the priesthood over-performs compared with the general population. For whatever reason. Natural or supernatural.

 

[foszoe]

So the pedo priests aren't pedos before they join the priesthood? What are you saying?

I mean. Sometimes natural causes explain things better than supernatural causes. Well. Nevermind. I don't want this to become a religious discussion. Let's just see if we can agree that the instance of pedos in the priesthood over-performs compared with the general population. For whatever reason. Natural or supernatural.

We did agree! Then when you offered speculative causal reasons, so did I. Both of us claim we don't necessarily buy the causal reasons offered. So we agreed!

There was a reason I used could not are or aren't.

Could says might be.

Are indicates is as a state of being.

I said could. When you respond with are I again simply respond could be. Are changes the discussion from what I originally said.

I don't think either of us can make a definitive causal statement.

 

[jamil]

Nah, its that excessive reverence paid to Mary that does it.

Wait. So priests **** little alterboys out of excessive reverence of Jesus's mom? I mean even purple doesn't put sufficient distance between that one.

 

[jamil]

We did agree! Then when you offered speculative causal reasons, so did I. Both of us claim we don't necessarily buy the causal reasons offered. So we agreed!

There was a reason I used could not are or aren't.

Could says might be.

Are indicates is as a state of being.

I said could. When you respond with are I again simply respond could be. Are changes the discussion from what I originally said.

I don't think either of us can make a definitive causal statement.

Punctuation is your friend! Trying to make sense of this. I guess you're talking about the confidence with which we speak: "are" vs "could be". Could you quote the part of what I said that you're referring to? The only thing I'm fairly certain about is that the priests who turn out to be pedos were pedos before they were priests.

Pedo's have a predilection for that sort of thing before they ever act out on it. The research seems to be pretty solid there, that it is both nature and nurture. So I doubt that priests turn pedo because of the celibacy rule. They're just pedos.

 

[foszoe]

The only thing I'm fairly certain about is that the priests who turn out to be pedos were pedos before they were priests.

So your position is that no priests become pedos after ordination?