Everything ANTIFA thread

[Ingomike]

Fox is hemorrhaging viewers...


Look at the specific shows:
Neil Cavuto, who stupidly cut away from the President’s Press Secretary, has shed almost 200,000 viewers.


The Five, with the intolerable Juan Williams, lost almost 600,000.


Bret Baier is not doing much better–he has 330,000 fewer viewers.


Martha MacCallum’s 7pm show fell by almost 400,000 “fans.”


Laura Ingraham, who is still pushing back against Fox’s shift to the left, still lost 491,000 viewers compared to August.


Last, and also hemorrahaging, is Shannon Bream. She’s down by 450,000 watchers.


Those are significant numbers and should worry any news executive keen on putting butts in seats and eyes on screens.


Now for the good news for Fox. Tucker and Sean are still crushing it. Tucker exceeded his August numbers by a monster increase just shy of 400,000.

Similar numbers for Sean–he’s up by whopping 505,000 over August.

 

[Bill of Rights]

Somebody told me the new Executive VP and head of gov't relations over at Fox News, Danny O'brien, is Sleepy Joe's former Chief of Staff.

Confirmed by websearch by me.

Blessings,
Bill

Fox is hemorrhaging viewers...


Look at the specific shows:
Neil Cavuto, who stupidly cut away from the President’s Press Secretary, has shed almost 200,000 viewers.


The Five, with the intolerable Juan Williams, lost almost 600,000.


Bret Baier is not doing much better–he has 330,000 fewer viewers.


Martha MacCallum’s 7pm show fell by almost 400,000 “fans.”


Laura Ingraham, who is still pushing back against Fox’s shift to the left, still lost 491,000 viewers compared to August.


Last, and also hemorrahaging, is Shannon Bream. She’s down by 450,000 watchers.


Those are significant numbers and should worry any news executive keen on putting butts in seats and eyes on screens.


Now for the good news for Fox. Tucker and Sean are still crushing it. Tucker exceeded his August numbers by a monster increase just shy of 400,000.

Similar numbers for Sean–he’s up by whopping 505,000 over August.

 

[blue2golf]

The Left continues its long march through our institutions.

Capitalism sees a profit in catering to untapped demand, thus Fox was created some 24 years ago to present a more center-right news source for the half of America that wanted a news source that didn't insult them all the time. Ratings soared and so did the loathing from leftists who couldn't abide a competing viewpoint, culminating during the Obama era when the president regularly complained about Fox News.

Oh how times change. As said before, looks like executive changes have mandated Fox join the drab ranks of the Borg Media. Now it shall suffer the historical fate of privation and suffering left wing dominance always brings, as shall America if we stay on this path.

Fox is hemorrhaging viewers...


Look at the specific shows:
Neil Cavuto, who stupidly cut away from the President’s Press Secretary, has shed almost 200,000 viewers.


The Five, with the intolerable Juan Williams, lost almost 600,000.


Bret Baier is not doing much better–he has 330,000 fewer viewers.


Martha MacCallum’s 7pm show fell by almost 400,000 “fans.”


Laura Ingraham, who is still pushing back against Fox’s shift to the left, still lost 491,000 viewers compared to August.


Last, and also hemorrahaging, is Shannon Bream. She’s down by 450,000 watchers.


Those are significant numbers and should worry any news executive keen on putting butts in seats and eyes on screens.


Now for the good news for Fox. Tucker and Sean are still crushing it. Tucker exceeded his August numbers by a monster increase just shy of 400,000.

Similar numbers for Sean–he’s up by whopping 505,000 over August.

 

[BugI02]

The Left continues its long march through our institutions.

Capitalism sees a profit in catering to untapped demand, thus Fox was created some 24 years ago to present a more center-right news source for the half of America that wanted a news source that didn't insult them all the time. Ratings soared and so did the loathing from leftists who couldn't abide a competing viewpoint, culminating during the Obama era when the president regularly complained about Fox News.

Oh how times change. As said before, looks like executive changes have mandated Fox join the drab ranks of the Borg Media. Now it shall suffer the historical fate of privation and suffering left wing dominance always brings, as shall America if we stay on this path.

Even allowing for how enervated a business degree has become, I can't see how anyone on a board of directors could believe being the 21st progressive media outlet, and late to the party, would pay off better than being first among conservative outlets

 

[IndyDave1776]

Even allowing for how enervated a business degree has become, I can't see how anyone on a board of directors could believe being the 21st progressive media outlet, and late to the party, would pay off better than being first among conservative outlets

When the person making the decisions shares a bed with a flaming leftist, this is what happens.

You also raised a good point that few seem to notice in that Fox was center-right, and not a true counterweight to the hard left alternatives.

 

[Phase2]

Even allowing for how enervated a business degree has become, I can't see how anyone on a board of directors could believe being the 21st progressive media outlet, and late to the party, would pay off better than being first among conservative outlets

You make the mistake of assuming it was a business decision and not a political one. On a strictly business/financial level, they've totally destroyed a profitable brand for no gain.

 

[Phase2]

Poster image being shared by far leftists on social media. Unity!!

 

[ghitch75]

Poster image being shared by far leftists on social media. Unity!!

they are that stupid....

 

[indyartisan]

Good video
Antifa Rise of the Black Flags

https://rumble.com/vawqrp-antifa-rise-of-the-black-flags.html

 

[KellyinAvon]

.

 

[Doug]

Don't misunderstand.
ANTIFA is NOT anti-government; they are anti-Republican, anti-Police, and anti-Capitalism.
They are pro-Democrat, pro-Anarchist, and pro-Communist.
They are the enforcement arm of the Democrat party.
ANTIFA and BLM have been and will be used to attack and destroy all who oppose the Socialism/Communism efforts of the Harris/Biden administration.

 

[indyartisan]

Know your enemy,
There will be no Biden/Harris Administration
I think you are right in that they will continue to be used by those who wish the US to be reformed for their and not our benefit.

 

[ghitch75]

there will be war....get ready

 

[indyartisan]

“If we are wise, let us prepare for the worst”
- George Washington

 

[KLB]

Don't misunderstand.
ANTIFA is NOT anti-government; they are anti-Republican, anti-Police, and anti-Capitalism.
They are pro-Democrat, pro-Anarchist, and pro-Communist.
They are the enforcement arm of the Democrat party.
ANTIFA and BLM have been and will be used to attack and destroy all who oppose the Socialism/Communism efforts of the Harris/Biden administration.

How can you be pro anarchy and pro anything to do with government?

 

[Hatin Since 87]

How can you be pro anarchy and pro anything to do with government?

The same way we are pro smaller government and pro military

 

[patience0830]

How can you be pro anarchy and pro anything to do with government?

But it will be "their" gubmint. Their way. Words don't actually have meanings. They're just labels of convenience and mean whatever they want them to mean.

 

[jamil]

Don't misunderstand.
ANTIFA is NOT anti-government; they are anti-Republican, anti-Police, and anti-Capitalism.
They are pro-Democrat, pro-Anarchist, and pro-Communist.
They are the enforcement arm of the Democrat party.
ANTIFA and BLM have been and will be used to attack and destroy all who oppose the Socialism/Communism efforts of the Harris/Biden administration.

That's not completely true but it's effectively true.

It's effectively true because most Antifa are anarcho-communists, so they advocate for no government, but anarcho-communism can't actually exist in the real world. The best I can make of what anarcho-communists say is that they envision some kind of government-less democratic communal system where there's no property ownership (other than small personal items: clothes, maybe a bicycle, small stuff).

So imagine a group of people stranded on an island where the group decides that there is no government, and no one gets to own property...everything belongs to everyone other than personal items. They might elect someone to act as a leader to do administrative type stuff, maybe settle disputes between individuals, etcetera. Major decisions are all made collectively, majority rules. So basically mob rule.

Now imagine what it turns into as they stumble upon all the ways human behavior is incompatible with this system, that they haven't thought out all the way. They'll eventually add more power to the leadership position. And along with that will come growth of responsibilities, authority, and commensurate corruption. Doubtful that it would survive as anarchy. There would evolve a defacto "government" which has the power that governments tend to have.

We saw a microcosm of that in early summer with CHAZ/CHOP. The progressive little ****wads took their 6 blocks of land and declared it to be exactly what they imagined. No government. No property ownership. But of course someone declared himself as their leader. Started acting as a leader. And eventually consolidated some power and formed what one might say was a government, not completely, but with something similar to a police force and an immigration ministry. For awhile they were checking people's ID's putting up barricades and such until it became such an embarrassment that they changed the name to CHOP and sort of stopped what had been functionally the "immigration ministry". The final blow was the CHAZ "police" mistook a couple of unarmed teens for someone who had committed a drive-by shooting earlier, and shot them, killing one of them. It got shut down.

What happened to CHAZ is exactly what one would expect to happen when a group tries to implement a system that is completely incompatible with human nature.

 

[jamil]

How can you be pro anarchy and pro anything to do with government?

Because they haven't thought this out all the way.

 

[Doug]

How can you be pro anarchy and pro anything to do with government?

Pro anarchy means you get to riot, burn, loot, and murder; pro government means the government allows and supports you doing those things as a way to attack the government's enemies.

Harris/Biden were in favor of the riots until they were told it didn't poll well. Then they said peaceful protesters were doing their patriotic duty, but they shouldn't burn and murder. They never condemned looting.