Colts 2024 - Embrace The Future

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ChristianPatriot

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    28   0   0
    Feb 11, 2013
    12,864
    113
    Clifford, IN
    I'd like to see him stay as long as the terms are reasonable.

    His deal is probably going to be bigger than people are expecting.

    Just preparing you all ahead of time for the “that’s way too big of a contract” discussions.

    Ballard said it himself is in press conference:

    “The market is what the market is," Ballard said. "You have to have gas in your car and if it’s $4 a gallon, it’s $4 a gallon. It is what it is. There are ways to build your team and if that’s one of the ways you need to do it, then you need to do it. ... You’ve got to have wideouts.”

    He’ll get close to Andrew Luck’s last contract, to put it into context.
     

    WebSnyper

    Time to make the chimichangas
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Jul 3, 2010
    15,726
    113
    127.0.0.1
    I’m really baffled by what has happened to him? No one seems to have an answer. CBS reportedly had meetings with him after the 2022 season trying to step-it up before the SB.
    I heard a report that Romo really went down the golf rabbit hole and just wasn't spending the time he needed to on his analyst gig. No idea if that is true or not, but seems plausible?
     

    BankShot

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 3, 2020
    699
    63
    Clark County
    His deal is probably going to be bigger than people are expecting.

    Just preparing you all ahead of time for the “that’s way too big of a contract” discussions.

    Ballard said it himself is in press conference:

    “The market is what the market is," Ballard said. "You have to have gas in your car and if it’s $4 a gallon, it’s $4 a gallon. It is what it is. There are ways to build your team and if that’s one of the ways you need to do it, then you need to do it. ... You’ve got to have wideouts.”

    He’ll get close to Andrew Luck’s last contract, to put it into context.
    Yep, that's how the NFL is. I saw an article earlier today saying they expect Dak to get $60 million a year from Dallas.
     
    Last edited:

    rhamersley

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2016
    3,749
    113
    Danville
    I heard a report that Romo really went down the golf rabbit hole and just wasn't spending the time he needed to on his analyst gig. No idea if that is true or not, but seems plausible?
    Too much Corona and his Sketchers slip ons cut the oxygen off to the brain? :dunno:
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,026
    113
    North Central
    The Bengals’ announcement means the three teams that still used slit film turf in 2023 — Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Minnesota — will all be switching their playing surfaces in 2024. Silt film turf is generally regarded as being more unsafe for player’s bodies.

     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,026
    113
    North Central
    ”For now, multiple sources have indicated that the teams expect the 2024 cap to be in the neighborhood of $242 million and $243 million. Another source, in response to that number, had this reaction: “More.”

    “Whatever it is, it’s a far cry from the initial cap, back in 1994, of $34.6 million.“

    “UPDATE 1:47 p.m. ET: Another source, with a proven record of accuracy in these matters, says it will be closer to $250 million than to $243 million.”
    Big bump in the cap


    Looks like the source was correct…
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    10,995
    113
    Avon
    What does INGO think?

    Will the Colts franchise tag Michael Pittman Jr?
    Sign him to a big extension? Let him walk in free agency?
    I don't see any scenario in which the Colts let MPJ hit the FA market. If they can't get a long-term deal done, I imagine that they tag him, let him test the waters, and then get the long-term deal done. (If someone wants to give up 2 firsts for him, though? Probably okay.)
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,026
    113
    North Central
    JT better enjoy that money he got. Some big name may not get any more even with the cap increase.


     

    ChristianPatriot

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    28   0   0
    Feb 11, 2013
    12,864
    113
    Clifford, IN
    JT better enjoy that money he got. Some big name may not get any more even with the cap increase.



    The Talking Heads were universally bashing the Colts when they were going though the contract negotiations with Taylor.
    “You pay your best players”
    “Good organizations find ways to keep good players on their roster”

    If/when Taylor gets nicked up and misses a game or two, those same morons will all say the same thing,
    “See, this is exactly why you don’t pay running backs.”
    “Good teams don’t get hamstrung by bad contracts.”
     

    BankShot

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 3, 2020
    699
    63
    Clark County
    The Talking Heads were universally bashing the Colts when they were going though the contract negotiations with Taylor.
    “You pay your best players”
    “Good organizations find ways to keep good players on their roster”

    If/when Taylor gets nicked up and misses a game or two, those same morons will all say the same thing,
    “See, this is exactly why you don’t pay running backs.”
    “Good teams don’t get hamstrung by bad contracts.”
    Yeah, you see so much of that on X.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    10,995
    113
    Avon
    The Talking Heads were universally bashing the Colts when they were going though the contract negotiations with Taylor.
    “You pay your best players”
    “Good organizations find ways to keep good players on their roster”

    If/when Taylor gets nicked up and misses a game or two, those same morons will all say the same thing,
    “See, this is exactly why you don’t pay running backs.”
    “Good teams don’t get hamstrung by bad contracts.”
    Part of the problem is that the talking heads were treating the Colts-JT situation as if JT weren't still under contract (and worse, as if JT were holding out), when in fact, all the negotiations happened a) while he was under contract, and b) while he was injured.

    Every single RB to whom the Colts-JT situation was compared was not under contract/tagged/holding out.

    In the end, JT got extended while still under contract, and that extension was reasonably at market value for his position and value/production. The Colts did everything right. JT (aside from his jackwagon of an agent - though, in the end, I guess even that worked out) did everything right.

    Talking heads are gonna talking-head. And often that leads to speaking out of both sides of their mouths.
     
    Top Bottom