Anti-gunners say...

[actaeon277]

 

[actaeon277]

How many things wrong can someone put in a single paragraph?

 

[jamil]

That guy is an idiot.

 

[actaeon277]

That guy is an idiot.

Well ... yeah.

 

[tomcat13]

 

[MCgrease08]

No need to have actual numbers or data. Feelings are all that matter.

 

[DeadeyeChrista'sdad]

States that have more legal carriers have 28 deaths per 100,000? Which states?

 

[actaeon277]

No need to have actual numbers or data. Feelings are all that matter.

some good replies there if you go to the "replies"

 

[actaeon277]

 

[actaeon277]

Parents freak out, because their daughter bought a small "gun safe" to protect her diary from her brother.
She doesn't have a gun, just a "gun safe".


Sigh.

Mental Melt Down: NYC “gun safe”

A young lady in NYC decided to write a diary. Being a young lady what she wrote in her diary she considered to be private. It was her thoughts, her fears, her wants. It was for her. Unfortunately, …

gunfreezone.net

 

[jamil]

Parents freak out, because their daughter bought a small "gun safe" to protect her diary from her brother.
She doesn't have a gun, just a "gun safe".


Sigh.

Mental Melt Down: NYC “gun safe”

A young lady in NYC decided to write a diary. Being a young lady what she wrote in her diary she considered to be private. It was her thoughts, her fears, her wants. It was for her. Unfortunately, …

gunfreezone.net

That is truly nutty.

 

[jamil]

No need to have actual numbers or data. Feelings are all that matter.

I'd say at that level it's ideology. But yeah. She knows the numbers don't support it. She doesn't believe that ordinary citizens should be armed and is only making claims she can't back up to try gaslight people. Then when she gets called on it she claims it doesn't matter.

 

[actaeon277]

Like when someone says having a gun increases your chances of being killed.
And then you point out their 5 armed guard, which should REALLY increase their chances then.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

That is truly nutty.

East Coast Eloi, my friend. It is an alien planet to us.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

I'd say at that level it's ideology. But yeah. She knows the numbers don't support it. She doesn't believe that ordinary citizens should be armed and is only making claims she can't back up to try gaslight people. Then when she gets called on it she claims it doesn't matter.

Religion, not just ideology. East Coast Eloi have a completely different view of the world.

 

[flatlander]

I'd say at that level it's ideology. But yeah. She knows the numbers don't support it. She doesn't believe that ordinary citizens should be armed and is only making claims she can't back up to try gaslight people. Then when she gets called on it she claims it doesn't matter.

Maybe she's looking to be Newsom's running mate

 

[2tonic]

Parents freak out, because their daughter bought a small "gun safe" to protect her diary from her brother.
She doesn't have a gun, just a "gun safe".


Sigh.

Mental Melt Down: NYC “gun safe”

A young lady in NYC decided to write a diary. Being a young lady what she wrote in her diary she considered to be private. It was her thoughts, her fears, her wants. It was for her. Unfortunately, …

gunfreezone.net

Per the article..." Is there an outreach program for people like this?"

Yes.
Someone should reach out and rearrange their dentrifice with knuckles (brass, preferably) or maybe a sap.
Might help 'em get their minds right.
Or, at least, we'd all feel better.

 

[jamil]

Per the article..." Is there an outreach program for people like this?"

Yes.
Someone should reach out and rearrange their dentrifice with knuckles (brass, preferably) or maybe a sap.
Might help 'em get their minds right.
Or, at least, we'd all feel better.

I think being publicly mocked and ridiculed would have some positive effects. But I admit it might not be as satisfying.

 

[actaeon277]

 

[KG1]

Apparently, there was a new thing going around FB where anti gunners tried to make the case that the Second Amendment reference to a “well-regulated militia” was a restriction in 1791 to one musket and 24 bullets. The actual fact of the matter is that it was the minimum requirement, not the maximum.

As a matter of fact, they can't even get their dates right for their claims. That minimum requirement wasn't even a thing until a year later when the Uniform Militia Act of 1792, was passed by congress a year after the claim asserts. The stupid fools will try any angle.

Fact check: Militia law in 1792 included minimum weapon requirements, but no maximums

There were minimums, but not maximums, for the number of weapons militiamen had to own in a 1792 law according to an expert.

www.usatoday.com