Four killed at FedEx building in Indianapolis

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 4651feeder

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Oct 21, 2016
    1,186
    63
    East of NWI
    I thought his stance was good. Finally some common sense gun measures. Waiting periods, tighter background checks, no private sales. These are things we should have. A lot better than banning ARs or 80% firearms which would do nothing.
    Until society addresses the issue of Evil, any measure of additional "supposedly sensible" firearm owner infringement will be for naught.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,045
    113
    Uranus
    I thought his stance was good. Finally some common sense gun measures. Waiting periods, tighter background checks, no private sales. These are things we should have. A lot better than banning ARs or 80% firearms which would do nothing.

    If common sense was common you wouldn't have posted this leftist gun grabber **** on a gun forum.

    I speak for everyone here when I say GTFO. (even the ones that say otherwise secretly agree with me)
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,301
    149
    1,000 yards out
    I thought his stance was good. Finally some common sense gun measures. Waiting periods, tighter background checks, no private sales. These are things we should have. A lot better than banning ARs or 80% firearms which would do nothing.


    Those infringements do nothing to stop evil.

    If anything, they enable evil by making it more difficult for intended victims to defend against.
     

    Chewie

    Old, Tired, Grumpy, Skeptical
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 28, 2012
    2,350
    113
    Martinsville
    I thought his stance was good. Finally some common sense gun measures. Waiting periods, tighter background checks, no private sales. These are things we should have. A lot better than banning ARs or 80% firearms which would do nothing.

    You had better review you comment and think long and hard about it. Everyone of those "common sense measures" leads directly to confiscation. You need to learn to play the long game based on leftists desires.
    Oh, and by the way, get your head out of your posterior. You are obviously in the dark and need to see the light as well as get some fresh air! The effect on your brain is rather obvious at this point!
     

    ghuns

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    9,341
    113
    I thought his stance was good. Finally some common sense gun measures. Waiting periods, tighter background checks, no private sales. These are things we should have. A lot better than banning ARs or 80% firearms which would do nothing.
    tenor.gif
     

    funeralweb

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Feb 9, 2013
    1,436
    113
    Earth/East Central I
    I thought his stance was good. Finally some common sense gun measures. Waiting periods, tighter background checks, no private sales. These are things we should have. A lot better than banning ARs or 80% firearms which would do nothing.
    Common sense tells the responsible gun owner to follow all laws of the land, including not use their firearms to kill or injure innocent human beings. It is a very widespread belief held by 99.999999999% of decent, law-abiding folks I'm happy to share the atmosphere with.
    My Spidey Sense tells me that whether you have 50, 500 or 5000 posts someday, your time spent perusing the INGO Classified section will be time wasted.
     

    Leverboy

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 29, 2021
    7
    3
    Indianapolis
    You're about to become real popular maybe even infamous
    Oh, I'm sure. I'm just coming from if I have one guy saying you have to wait a little longer to get your AR vs. another guy saying you can't have an AR, I can wait. If me waiting means that some psycho can't walk into a gun shop all hyped up, buy a gun and take some people out, is that really a bad thing? Does it suck for those of us who play nicely? Most definitely.
    My opinion is just that, my opinion. How do we protect our rights and at the same time stop senseless violence. Serious question. You and I both know that a person did this, not a gun but we have to come up with a better solution than just flag waving and saying, "You can't tell me what to do!". People need an answer to gun violence. Shouldn't we, as gun owners come up with the answer before they do?
     

    flatlander

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    18   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    4,207
    113
    Noblesville
    I thought his stance was good. Finally some common sense gun measures. Waiting periods, tighter background checks, no private sales. These are things we should have. A lot better than banning ARs or 80% firearms which would do nothing.
    FYI, on here we use PURPLE to show sarcasm. I really hope that's what you were attempting.

    On second thought, after reading another post of yours, YOU are part of the problem in this country. Nothing but a FUDD. YOU are the reason there are GFZ's to begin with. YOU are ok with the eroding of our GOD GIVEN RIGHTS over the past few decades. You call yourself a gun owner but allow the government to take away rights. YOU are a waste of oxygen when it comes to supporting our 2 Amendment rights.

    Another QUISLING exposed for what he is:ranton:
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom