Why Do You Believe The Media And Keep Posting Their Links?

[Ingomike]

There are posters here that routinely post links from the mockingbird deep state media, apparently they must trust them or they would not post them so much. (If you don't know what the mockingbird reference means, research it, the CIA compromised our media.)

If one knows of the mockingbird program, the collaboration exposed in the wiki-leaks Podesta/HRC emails between them and the press, how can one believe much of anything they put out? If one reads of the indoctrination the journalism programs put out, their recruiting of activists as students how can one believe any of it? When they are caught covering up for those they are to cover, how can one believe them to tell the truth? When they (the media) had a private server for their secret use to discuss what, how, and why to cover the "news" they presented you, why would you believe them? We have proven liars Dan Rather and Brian Williams still on major shows, why would anyone believe them?


In days of old if a trust was broken the entity was finished. Now they get caught and laugh back at us.

Why does anyone believe them?

 

[Kutnupe14]

I have a strong suspicion that the media you take issue with, is that which disagrees with you.

 

[churchmouse]

I do not post or even really look when posted. I have serious issues with the MSM and their objectives.

 

[Ingomike]

I have a strong suspicion that the media you take issue with, is that which disagrees with you.

So I'll mark you down as "because I agree with them and they support my team".

 

[Tombs]

I have a strong suspicion that the media you take issue with, is that which disagrees with you.

....Right

 

[Thor]

I don't believe anything they say if it can not be verified. Anyone really...not just 'they'.

 

[IndyDave1776]

I have a strong suspicion that the media you take issue with, is that which disagrees with you.

I take issue with media who deal in attempts to shape my thinking rather than telling me who, what, when, where, why, and how.

 

[IndyDave1776]

There are posters here that routinely post links from the mockingbird deep state media, apparently they must trust them or they would not post them so much. (If you don't know what the mockingbird reference means, research it, the CIA compromised our media.)

If one knows of the mockingbird program, the collaboration exposed in the wiki-leaks Podesta/HRC emails between them and the press, how can one believe much of anything they put out? If one reads of the indoctrination the journalism programs put out, their recruiting of activists as students how can one believe any of it? When they are caught covering up for those they are to cover, how can one believe them to tell the truth? When they (the media) had a private server for their secret use to discuss what, how, and why to cover the "news" they presented you, why would you believe them? We have proven liars Dan Rather and Brian Williams still on major shows, why would anyone believe them?


In days of old if a trust was broken the entity was finished. Now they get caught and laugh back at us.

Why does anyone believe them?

Generally I use there material when they admit to truth that is so obvious they can't spin it into their narrative.

 

[printcraft]

 

[Ingomike]

Generally I use there material when they admit to truth that is so obvious they can't spin it into their narrative.

And cite the 14 paragraph of a NYT article that tells a truth 180 from and contradicts the headline.

 

[Tombs]

I take issue with media who deal in attempts to shape my thinking rather than telling me who, what, when, where, why, and how.

About the only media source like that is RT news, and only as long as it's regarding strictly domestic American issues. For global politics, there's really not any straight up news.

 

[Ingomike]

I was hoping those that love to post mockingbird media posts in threads like the vaccine thread so wholeheartedly believe the media described above and the government and pharmaceutical companies that have been proven liars in the past, would explain why they trust them.

 

[Kutnupe14]

So I'll mark you down as "because I agree with them and they support my team".

How about these beliefs I hold:
Michael Brown was a criminal, and the shooting was justified?
Or
George Zimmerman should've walked because there was not enough evidence to convict him?

I've made both these points in open forum. That would seem to contradict your premise.

 

[Kutnupe14]

About the only media source like that is RT news, and only as long as it's regarding strictly domestic American issues. For global politics, there's really not any straight up news.

You're serious aren't you? Why exactly?

 

[Tombs]

You're serious aren't you? Why exactly?

In all of my time using them, I never see opinions injected into the information. It's covered as dry as humanly possible and in very brief terms. They also tend to get a notification out ahead of anyone else when something major happens, like a shooting.

 

[Kutnupe14]

In all of my time using them, I never see opinions injected into the information. It's covered as dry as humanly possible and in very brief terms. They also tend to get a notification out ahead of anyone else when something major happens, like a shooting.

Fair enough. I don't watch RT, and ironically (given the topic at hand) I've formed an opinion based on other media sources.

 

[Tombs]

Fair enough. I don't watch RT, and ironically (given the topic at hand) I've formed an opinion based on other media sources.

They are biased where you would expect them to be biased.

They simply do not care about the 57 genders of a mass shooter or sensationalizing his actions, etc.

 

[Ingomike]

How about these beliefs I hold:
Michael Brown was a criminal, and the shooting was justified?
Or
George Zimmerman should've walked because there was not enough evidence to convict him?

I've made both these points in open forum. That would seem to contradict your premise.

I asked no question of anyone's beliefs rather I asked why posters post links to known liars and believe them. Why would anyone believe anything a network the employs Brian Williams reports? The act of keeping a disgraced liar on their staff is all the evidence I need they don't care about the truth. And I m not talking incorrect reporting, out and out lying...

 

[1DOWN4UP]

It is funny how Rush would play his montage of 20 left talking heads, saying the exact same talking points verbatim every day of the week.
That really showed how the left robot public was being spoon fed a big line of poopy.

 

[churchmouse]

I take issue with media who deal in attempts to shape my thinking rather than telling me who, what, when, where, why, and how.

"WINNING"