-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Rittenhouse pleads 'Not Guilty'
- Thread starter Amishman44
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
None of his lawyers are poor, I'll bet and now an attorney is pleading for more money to pay more lawyers. Rittenhouse might be looking in the wrong places for the wrong job. I would think that he could get employment with a pro-gun outfit of one kind or another that would pay for a lot of his legal problems.
Last edited:
NONE of us make the money necessary to fend off major legal battles. NONE. We are talking about someone that is barely more than a kid and you think he can work and pay of the legal fees of major litigation probably funded by anti-gunners?
Lawyers are a dime a dozen, good competent trial lawyers do get big compensation for their skills and do not work cheap. (One only need look at the cluster **** that is going on in the Delphi murder case.)
Last edited:
Never hire a cheap lawyer.
You can’t not afford the expensive one.
You can’t not afford the expensive one.
I'm not that naive. I didn't mean to imply that he could make enough to pay his legal defenses. My comment was regarding the lawyer's reference that Rittenhouse is barely living above "hand to mouth"! None of us work as stars for organizations with major bucks and have not held the national spotlight. With the right guidance, he may have been able to cash in on his fame. As far as his legal defense, his lawyer is suggesting donations. That is where that money will come from.
manifest destiny
Master
I never really assumed KR made any money from his ordeal. In fact, I rather assumed his finances were wrecked in the near-to-mid term.
Twangbanger
Grandmaster
- Oct 9, 2010
- 7,104
- 113
Just playing a little devils advocate here, but it's plausible no "pro gun outfit" would snap him up. He may not have any skills he can monetize at his current age, and young people can turn out to be "Bristol Palin" liabilities.
Given that he successfully defended his life against multiple people that reasonably put him in mortal fear - and avoided the alternative, i.e. being killed - I'm quite sure that he does, indeed, think that "it was all worth it".
He's referring to the donation money.
The real money will be from the defamation lawsuits.
You're missing my point
Please: do enlighten me. What is your point?
Twangbanger
Grandmaster
- Oct 9, 2010
- 7,104
- 113
It seems there is always no shortage of progressive/marxist funded organizations to pay for legal help for any fellow traveler who gets in deep or to find a person willing to accuse the target du jour of sexual crimes etc
We on the right need to have similar organizations, start-up funded by our billionaires and sustained by donations, that will step in to pay for star legal help in situations like Kyle's or help find some everyman to be the face on the court challenges to government overreach while they pay the bills
It is correct that even a man of Trump's means feels the pinch of funding legal defense to law fair and restrictions like those in Kommiefornia on ammo or those enacted in NY after Bruen need to be challenged to get a court to step in and, through injunctions, further define the gray areas that progressives like to operate in. The tactics of the left must be met with similar tactics on the right because very few men can fund such legal defenses on their own
We on the right need to have similar organizations, start-up funded by our billionaires and sustained by donations, that will step in to pay for star legal help in situations like Kyle's or help find some everyman to be the face on the court challenges to government overreach while they pay the bills
It is correct that even a man of Trump's means feels the pinch of funding legal defense to law fair and restrictions like those in Kommiefornia on ammo or those enacted in NY after Bruen need to be challenged to get a court to step in and, through injunctions, further define the gray areas that progressives like to operate in. The tactics of the left must be met with similar tactics on the right because very few men can fund such legal defenses on their own
He put himself there. His decision. He knew it was hot zone. Why else would you strap on someone else's gun and go? I'm sure now he wishes he would've stayed put
Twangbanger
Grandmaster
- Oct 9, 2010
- 7,104
- 113
So, in other words: his skirt was too short?
Not sure the meaning here in this context. If you want to expound on that that would be great. I don't mind having a logical conversation. I appreciate you at least engaging and not just throwing up emojis without any context
Site Supporter
Staff online
-
Cameramonkeywww.thechosen.tv
Members online
- venenoindy
- edwea
- Old Dog
- Doug
- sailordave
- Billythekid
- maxipum
- 63PGP
- Leadeye
- Snapdragon
- mgross28
- Beretta76
- Tryin'
- Cameramonkey
- dmazzio
- HoosierLife
- Timjoebillybob
- bigdaddy1427
- MCgrease08
- Chaplain
- KARP
- Flingarrows
- cswan
- Colt556
- Creedmoor
- jsx1043
- derrickgoins
- fireball168
- jbhummer2
- paintman
- gpasp101
- Frank_N_Stein
- Hoosier45
- nbunga
- crookcountygo
- Wolfhound
- Cavman
- Gman75
- jim b
- Luke9455
- Rafterman
- bobjones223
- mcapo
- barber613
- Hoosierdood
- chipperej
- EEpro
- Bosshoss
- INgunowner
- cmann250
