FBI raids Trumps home

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • gregr

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 1, 2016
    4,328
    113
    West-Central




    The replies show exactly what we are up against. Nazi germany is here, be prepared. Dont cave in because of the simps here excusing this behavior.

    We are at war. We`ve been at war for some time. It`s a spiritual war, but it`s also a political one. Good, wholesome, decent people are fighting for their values, ethics and principles, against those who are socialists, globalists, statists, anti-American, godless thugs. The future of this once great Republic hangs in the balance.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,140
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I disagree. Having concluded that the Jan 6 hearings weren't going to do it, this is the next step. People afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome are trying to find something that will bar Trump from running in 2024.
    And many theoretically on 'our' side will tirelessly promote the candidacy of people the progressives don't fear and may even welcome

    Jeb 2.0

    When our enemies (yes, they are the enemies of the people) fear him so much, why would anyone want to run anyone else? Ask Vidkun Quisling
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    So there was no "intent"... I mean, good for the goose, good for the gander, right?
    Yep. It was good enough for HRC to be let off the hook. I don't see any way they can say that Trump illegally intended to take classified documents when as POTUS he had the ability to declassify anything that he wanted.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,599
    113
    Gtown-ish
    The probable cause is Trump could run in 2024 and we just can’t have that, can we?
     

    LeftyGunner

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 10, 2022
    589
    63
    Indianapolis
    Yep. It was good enough for HRC to be let off the hook. I don't see any way they can say that Trump illegally intended to take classified documents when as POTUS he had the ability to declassify anything that he wanted.
    In 2018 Trump signed the law that made unauthorized removal or retention of federal documents a felony.

    Clinton could not be prosecuted under this law because her alleged misdeeds occurred before the law was passed.

    Trump should have known this law would be used against him, and he could have declassified the items he wanted to retain, but he chose not to.

    This is an unforced error by Trump.
     

    DragonGunner

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 14, 2010
    5,563
    113
    N. Central IN
    In 2018 Trump signed the law that made unauthorized removal or retention of federal documents a felony.

    Clinton could not be prosecuted under this law because her alleged misdeeds occurred before the law was passed.

    Trump should have known this law would be used against him, and he could have declassified the items he wanted to retain, but he chose not to.

    This is an unforced error by Trump.
    Trumps lawyers said they were already declassified. Try to keep up and stop gaslighting. This was already brought up.
     

    Hatin Since 87

    Bacon Hater
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 31, 2018
    11,534
    77
    Mooresville
    In 2018 Trump signed the law that made unauthorized removal or retention of federal documents a felony.

    Clinton could not be prosecuted under this law because her alleged misdeeds occurred before the law was passed.

    Trump should have known this law would be used against him, and he could have declassified the items he wanted to retain, but he chose not to.

    This is an unforced error by Trump.
    So, what hillary did wasnt against any prior laws?


    Trump being president couldnt authorize the removal of the documents he removed?


    This sounds like support of the raid, to which i will say, the boots licked today may be on another foot tomorrow.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,872
    113
    .

    The dog will certainly eat that homework. I don't see Trump's lawyers or anybody else getting it.
     
    Top Bottom