Did world war 3 just start?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ATOMonkey

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    7,635
    48
    Plainfield
    Have you ever seen an aircraft crash site? Other than a crash during takeoff or landing at near zero altitude, if one falls from the sky as this one did from just over 7000 feet, there won't be anything left bigger than your forearm. The huge fireball in the video is the full load of fuel sufficient for the flight duration exploding on impact. I'm putting my money on aircraft malfunction. Ukrainian airliner, flying to Kiev, with nearly all of its passengers Iranian students returning to school in the Ukraine, plus a couple dozen foreign passengers. OTOH, a grossly negligent shoot down by idiot Iranian air defense personnel, or some other radical loony with a "zip gun", wouldn't surprise me. In the Conspiracy Theory Column, there's a less likely possibility of a false flag deliberate shoot down. Such a perfidious and treacherous act would be well within the realm of the morally and ethically bankrupt Ayatollah and his government cronies - and Putin's as well. Iran stating it's not going to give the black boxes to Boeing doesn't surprise me. The Ukraine, however, has a legitimate claim to them as it was their flagged airliner that went down.

    John

    An exaggeration to be sure, but yes, lots of bits and pieces everywhere.

    I am also willing to bet on stupidity. It was either stupidly shot down, or stupidly flown into the ground, or stupidly maintained, or maybe a combination of all 3.

    I have seen video of a C-130 crashing shortly after takeoff with only a single engine failure. Pilot did everything the exact wrong way.

    Both 737 Max crashes were because of the pilot's failure to recognize and correctly respond to the situation.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,174
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I believe so.

    Too slow, all modern SAMs pretty much solid fuel. Fire trail sheds visibly hot debris at ~:08-9 seconds, likely internal engine parts or part of the airframe. Whatever happened happened off camera

    Catastrophic failure of a CFM56 certainly possible (esp. if poorly maintained) but very unlikely. If only one engine failed, a/c should still be flyable if not overloaded. More here than meets the eye
     

    Sigblitz

    Grandmaster
    Trainer Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Aug 25, 2018
    14,613
    113
    Indianapolis
    Too slow, all modern SAMs pretty much solid fuel. Fire trail sheds visibly hot debris at ~:08-9 seconds, likely internal engine parts or part of the airframe. Whatever happened happened off camera

    Catastrophic failure of a CFM56 certainly possible (esp. if poorly maintained) but very unlikely. If only one engine failed, a/c should still be flyable if not overloaded. More here than meets the eye

    I could go either way. To me, it looks like a missile. And the blinking lights look like an aircraft. And it was quickly reported that it was shot down by Iran's missile defense system.
    And if it is an oops, and could be reported as mechanical failure, it's going to be mechanical failure from this day forward.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,174
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Iranian official tells state television that his country can hit a hundred other American targets if the Trump Administration retaliates.

    This is one of the few times I really do have a worry when it comes to Trump's attitude. Maybe I'm pessimistic and just think he's the type to ignore the "win" and take this bait. Or, alternatively, maybe he's surrounded by far smarter people that realize this is an empty threat, and the best course of action is inaction.

    Biases showing?

    If Trump does something you consider stupid, it appears you are ready to chalk it up as being all Trump

    If he does what you consider smart, you appear ready to chalk it up to other, smarter people restraining his rash impulses

    Isn't there a third possibility? That he actually knows what he's doing?

    Nah. Just ignore what he's managed to accomplish or chalk it up to 'dumb luck'
     

    avboiler11

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Jun 12, 2011
    2,950
    119
    New Albany
    Have you ever seen an aircraft crash site? Other than a crash during takeoff or landing at near zero altitude, if one falls from the sky as this one did from just over 7000 feet, there won't be anything left bigger than your forearm.

    This is not true...and yes I’ve been to an accident site with 400kt impact speeds in the last 14 months.

    This in no way looks like an aircraft malfunction.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,174
    149
    Columbus, OH
    So you wanted Trump to retaliate even though there were apparently no US casualties? The whole point was about Trump exhibiting restraint when people were'nt so sure that he was capable of doing so.

    He just wants Trump to make a mistake. That would make the continuous retconning of the Obama administration's fecklessness easier
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,174
    149
    Columbus, OH
    So far all I've heard this morning is indicating it was mechanical issues that caused the plane crash. Not really surprising given Boeing's recent history.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...70-passengers-feared-dead-ukraine-boeing-737/

    The first thing to note about the crash of Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752 is that the aircraft was a Boeing 737-800, a different model to the 737 Max, the type which was grounded last year after two crashes in five months.
    The 737-800 - part of Boeing’s 737 Next Generation (NG) family - does not have the “MCAS” control system fitted to the Max, and which is blamed for the two crashes.
    A modernised version of the 737 classic model dating from the 1960s, 737 NGs are one of the most popular airliners ever.
    More than 7,000 737 NGs, of which about 5,000 are the 800 model, are in service and the aircraft has a very good safety record. Prior to PS752, there had been nine accidents involving the aircraft type which have resulted in fatalities.
    One was the result of a mid-air collision, and all but one of the rest have been attributed to either weather problems, pilot error, maintenance issues or a combination of these factors. The final incident saw an engine failure which sent debris into the cabin, causing the aircraft to decompress. A passenger was partially sucked from the aircraft and later died from her injuries.
    Overall, the 737 NG has a fatal crash rate of 0.06 fatalities per million flights according to data from Airsafe, making it one of the safest aircraft in service.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,174
    149
    Columbus, OH

    Good post

    One other thing that came to mind. That China Airlines flight that burned at the gate after landing in 2018. IIRK there was some kind of bolt on a flap stop getting loose and puncturing fuel plumbing/tank. I think an emergency AD was supposed to be done, but with sketchy airlines who knows

    I've seen the footage of that fire, and if it happened in flight it would be a nightmare. Lack of crew communication with the ground could be they were just too busy fighting for their lives. If it was hostile action could just as likely be onboard bomb in a country like Iran that likely has porous security if you're connected to the right faction
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Damn. It looks like the liberals got to Trump. The plans for a glass installation have been put on hold.

    No military retaliation at this time.
     

    avboiler11

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Jun 12, 2011
    2,950
    119
    New Albany
    Allowing the Iranian “response” to stand isn’t weak, but rather a reasoned and appropriate deescalation given no US casualties

    Smart move, IMO...especially since we can always smash their bases with Tomahawks and JASSM-ERs later if it proves necessary.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    It is beginning to be apparent that the elimination of Soleimani was the right thing to do and sent a very powerful message to Iran that may have gotten their attention.

    Iran obviously did not want an escalation due to the outcome of their half assed “retaliation” that appears to be intentional.

    The liberal Democrats and their msm wing have been proven to be on the wrong side of history for not backing this particular President in this endeavor for political reasons.
     
    Top Bottom