I wont take that bet. I also suspect it has something to do with the police contracts too. They likely dont want the headaches/optics of outlawing their officers' sidearms. Can they be exempted? Yes. But Im sure there are other grey areas they dont want to tread in. (like thinking officers might have to check out/in their guns because once they are off duty they would be more likely to be considered prohibited possessers, etc)I bet some of the higher ups have stock in the company that makes Glock.