Alec Baldwin shares 'Rust' crew member's post calling claims of unsafe working conditions 'bulls***'

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • OkieGirl

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 20, 2012
    1,551
    113
    iti anunka (In the trees)
    I don't see how either Baldwin or his legal team can argue the point of whether the production environment was unsafe

    Even ignoring or minimizing the complaints of the professionals who walked off the production, the fact that someone was shot and killed due to negligent behavior is de facto evidence that it was an unsafe production environment

    This is usually my first 'check box' on the "Safe/UnSafe Test". Did someone die? Yes = Unsafe

     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    25,017
    150
    Avon
    Dyer previously defended “Girls Gone Wild” creator Joe Francis, who had been charged with racketeering and child pornography, as well as astronaut Buzz Aldrin, who punched a conspiracy theorist who insisted the moon landing was fake. Aldrin was not charged.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,863
    113
    .
    Since other thread is dead, I'll post here.

    I think the state is too involved when incidents occur between people such as this. State should be a mediator.

    Laws and punishments exist, but the state was not harmed. A man and a woman were. If all three parties/estates can agree to settlement i don't see the value in prison time. Sure, put a charge in there to forbid firearm use. Put some clauses in a settlement agreement where he admits fault. But prison? Who does that help?

    I believe he should be able to offer whatever to those he injured to right the wrong, and if they agree, then no jail time.

    Same issue with the state that you have with Rittenhouse, the taking of life in any fashion is an act that the state reserves solely for itself. People can kill with the state's blessing, and even with it's encouragement, but if it is the individual's direction the state sees that as a usurpation of it's power and reacts accordingly. Leadership saw Rittenhouse as a vigilante and that's an anathema to them, Baldwin was an accident and will be seen as less hostile to state power.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,267
    113
    Merrillville
    Wait a min. They need someone on set to monitor weapon safety
    Doesn't this person already exist? Possibly goes by a name like... Armorer?

    Geez, more like they want a fall guy in place next time some jacka** does something stupid. Accept no responsibility is the name of the game.

    :bash:
    Yup.
    You beat me to it.

    Maybe, they should hold the Producer responsible.
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,098
    113
    So, you believe unionized industries...(snicker, excuse me)...should be able (snort, so sorry)...to basically operate workplaces...(cough)...as they see fit...(hoowee, bear with me here)...have all parties work it out with a handshake...(wheeze)...and the GOVERNMENT stay out of it? :lmfao::laugh::joke:
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,267
    113
    Merrillville
    So, you believe unionized industries...(snicker, excuse me)...should be able (snort, so sorry)...to basically operate workplaces...(cough)...as they see fit...(hoowee, bear with me here)...have all parties work it out with a handshake...(wheeze)...and the GOVERNMENT stay out of it? :lmfao::laugh::joke:

    That's just crazy talk
     

    Goodfoot

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 25, 2021
    54
    28
    Noblesville

    russc2542

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Oct 24, 2015
    2,127
    83
    Columbus
    Same issue with the state that you have with Rittenhouse, the taking of life in any fashion is an act that the state reserves solely for itself. People can kill with the state's blessing, and even with it's encouragement, but if it is the individual's direction the state sees that as a usurpation of it's power and reacts accordingly. Leadership saw Rittenhouse as a vigilante and that's an anathema to them, Baldwin was an accident and will be seen as less hostile to state power.
    Another difference is Baldwin is already a strong advocate for gun control. "My eff-up is someone else's fault and the state should be able to prevent it by taking away everyone else's guns" while Rittenhouse is a rallying point for the opposite.
     

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,638
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    In a new interview he states he didn't pull the trigger, I guess single actions just cock themselves and pull the trigger, also for that scene I guess it didn't even require a gun be fired.
     

    miguel

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Oct 24, 2008
    6,620
    113
    16T
    83206ae67da70662c246b9cca0b92d2da77cae199a14e8d23e102739d5192b2e.jpg
     
    Top Bottom