Kirk Freeman
Grandmaster
I object, this is clearly entrapment.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
18 US Code 930 - Posession of Firearms and dangerous weapons in federal faciliti
- Thread starter JeffINGunner
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
I object, this is clearly entrapment.
Kirk Freeman
Grandmaster
Well, wondering why you are trying so hard to keep people law-abiding. Seems like counter-intuitive marketing.
You behave.
I hereby sentence you to go to your bookshelf, look up barratry in Black's and copy the definition 18,930 times.
FYI, according to the OP's profile, it's Dan. The Jeff refers to his residence in Jeffersonville.
And I too want photos, Denny.
Kirk Freeman
Grandmaster
No. As others have told you, no.
Carrying your handgun for self-defense is not an other lawful purpose. Just because you want it to be a certain way, does not mean that it magically becomes this way.
Read Cruz-Bancroft and let's talk further.
The Bubba Effect
Grandmaster
The case you cited appears to show that a guy claimed the "other lawful purposes" justification and one court agreed with him and the next court did not. Is that accurate? Can us layfolks conclude that the legality of any action is determined by the actor being brought to court for it and then whatever the last court says determines whether or not it was legal?
If people are determined to run with scissors, they will. There's only so much you can do...
Only if he did not previously have a predilection for such risk-taking, and would not otherwise have entered some federal facility OC his gat and selfie stick. He has already manifested his intention to do so in this thread.
By the way, he hasn't been posting for a day or so...
Exactly.
This whole thing is like watching Nature on PBS - sure you love the scrappy little coyote that tries to get some of the wolves' fresh kill. But when the pack turns on him, you just have to stand back and watch... and take photos for posting on INGO.
Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it. Bar-ra-try, vexatious litigation or incitement to it.
Whereas I am not a lawyer or other officer of the court And have as a layman advised the OP that I believe he is mistaken in his reading of the USC,
I wanna see the PICS.
Whereas I am not a lawyer or other officer of the court And have as a layman advised the OP that I believe he is mistaken in his reading of the USC,
I wanna see the PICS.
Last edited:
eatsnopaste
Expert
So help me if you have ruined it for the rest of us... This is why people don't like lawyers (unless of course he/she happens to be yours)
Well, wondering why you are trying so hard to keep people law-abiding. Seems like counter-intuitive marketing.
It's reverse psychology. Kirk can't help himself thinking about that $1,000/hr payday.
Timjoebillybob
Grandmaster
- Feb 27, 2009
- 9,421
- 149
You asked for people that have been arrested and charged. I gave them to you.
Lauderdale Man Convicted On Gun Charges - tribunedigital-sunsentinel
The irony.
I thought it was entrapment only if the person wouldn't normally do it?
I'm just sitting back waiting for the "need help with bail" thread on INGO.
Guys like Jeff (or Dan, is it?) provide job security for lawyers!
Lets say OP is right, and that he would win his case in court. It's still incredibly expensive. It's like a self defense shooting: sure, you can "win." But everything that goes with it sucks so bad, you want to avoid it at all costs, even if you could guarantee you come out on top. Some victories are Pyrhic.
We haven't heard from him in a few days, though. I'm starting to wonder if the selfie didn't go so well.
Of course, this all assuming my first hunch about this thread is incorrect.
From my perspective, that's pretty darned important.
We've tried, Kirk. There've been upwards of 200, probably upwards of 250 posts by the time this one shows up (I didn't look at page 7 to see which post Matlock shows up in) (ETA: #259)
At this point, if someone goes to jail based on what they read in this thread, it's because they, like the OP, choose to deny the facts of the law, despite good (and free!) advice to the contrary.
If the witness you are questioning perjures himself, despite advice from counsel not to do so, whose fault is it when the cuffs clink on?
I commend your efforts to quash this vat of bovine excrement. You're correct, it does need to stop. I am reminded again, however, that none are so blind as those who refuse to see.
Blessings,
Bill
- Status
