18 US Code 930 - Posession of Firearms and dangerous weapons in federal faciliti

[BehindBlueI's]

Just visited the St. Louis Arch. Signage seemed to indicate the friendly cops on bicycles would arrest you if you brought a firearm through the metal detector. Didn't test the theory.

Side note: Learned my shoes contain metal.

 

[T.Lex]

Just visited the St. Louis Arch. Signage seemed to indicate the friendly cops on bicycles would arrest you if you brought a firearm through the metal detector. Didn't test the theory.

Side note: Learned my shoes contain metal.

Must be in good shape to hike the arch in the steel-toe jackboots.

 

[bobzilla]

Wow.

If EVERYONE around you seems to be wrong, it's highly likely they're not. It's not impossible that he's the only one that is right, just highly improbable.

So yeah, I have to second that "Wow"

 

[bobzilla]

Must be in good shape to hike the arch in the steel-toe jackboots.

Hike? They don't hike. Other JB's drive them around in style while pointing out how THEY use their JB. lol

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Jeff, you are aware of 18 USC §930(f) as well, correct?

 

[Woobie]

You do understand that .gov has not included carrying a firearm in self-defense in the definition of a lawful purpose, right?

Their property rules are not the same as the state of Indiana's definition. Dual sovereignty/different railroad tracks, right?

Next you're gonna tell us that we need to know what has been defined as a lawful purpose.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Jim, can you post the Cruz-Bancroft decision? I cannot find a free link.

This nonsense has gone on long enough. This is like arguing with the INGO Safety Committee.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Here we go. Decent discussion in Cruz-Bancroft: FindACase™ | United States v. Cruz-Bancroft

 

[Woobie]

Here we go. Decent discussion in Cruz-Bancroft: FindACase™ | United States v. Cruz-Bancroft

If you Denny this, so help me, I will never forgive you.

 

[HoughMade]

Here we go. Decent discussion in Cruz-Bancroft: FindACase™ | United States v. Cruz-Bancroft

Quicker than me by a few minutes. That's the case I referred to early on in this thread.

In other words, the possession of the firearm must be not only lawful, but also must be for a lawful purpose that is related to the federal facility. Any other interpretation would fail to give full effect to every word in the statute.

 

[T.Lex]

I apologize for being so stubborn and refusing to listen to others or consider that they may have knowledge and experience which gives them useful insight into the topic.

My bad.

Speaking of Freak Out Condition 2 - has NO ONE NOTICED HOUGHMADE'S ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED?

 

[Kirk Freeman]

If you Denny this, so help me, I will never forgive you.

It's time to bring the curtain down.

This isn't some lunatic political thread like the neo-Confederates start with some deranged alternative view of history, people can go to jail if they do not understand/spew misinformation about 18 USC §930.

 

[HoughMade]

It's time to bring the curtain down.

This isn't some lunatic political thread like the neo-Confederates start with some deranged alternative view of history, people can go to jail if they do not understand/spew misinformation about 18 USC §930.

Together now!

DENN-Y!
DENN-Y!
DENN-Y!

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Being prosecuted in federal court is less than optimal, even a misdemeanor.

Let's bring the light so others may avoid it.

 

[T.Lex]

When I first read that, I thought it said, "Deny! Deny! Deny!"

Which also kinda fits into this thread.

 

[eldirector]

Being prosecuted in federal court is less than optimal, even a misdemeanor.

Let's bring the light so others may avoid it.

Hush, you. We don't want light. We want fireworks.

 

[Birds Away]

It's time to bring the curtain down.

This isn't some lunatic political thread like the neo-Confederates start with some deranged alternative view of history, people can go to jail if they do not understand/spew misinformation about 18 USC §930.

It might be a public service. People who can't pass this particular litmus test might be better off under constant care.

 

[HoughMade]

When I first read that, I thought it said, "Deny! Deny! Deny!"

Which also kinda fits into this thread.

Yeah, it's tough to convey an enthusiastic chant with the written word....and you are absolutely right.

 

[cobber]

Hush, you. We don't want light. We want fireworks.

I want to see OP's selfie, entering the Homer Capehart Federal Building with his pistol strapped to his hip and security waving him on through...

 

[Kirk Freeman]

When I first read that, I thought it said, "Deny! Deny! Deny!"

Working my side of the street now?