Drug test to attend homecoming dance?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,232
    77
    Porter County
    Interesting. Who selected the committee members who blocked it?
    Not really relevant is it? Did the 220 Ds vote to block the bill? No. The committee chairs don't seem to have brought it to a vote in the two committees in was sent to, so 2 Ds blocked it. That makes the article misleading. Stretching the truth is wrong, whichever side does it.
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    Not really relevant is it? Did the 220 Ds vote to block the bill? No. The committee chairs don't seem to have brought it to a vote in the two committees in was sent to, so 2 Ds blocked it. That makes the article misleading. Stretching the truth is wrong, whichever side does it.
    That's cute. You think a couple-few dumocraps blocked something independently without being told how to think by "the party"?
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,232
    77
    Porter County
    That's cute. You think a couple-few dumocraps blocked something independently without being told how to think by "the party"?
    And you think that 220 democrats got together and voted to see if it would get out of committee? Whether it was Pelosi or the committee chairs, the article is still misleading.
     

    hoosierdoc

    Freed prisoner
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Apr 27, 2011
    25,987
    149
    Galt's Gulch
    Not really relevant is it? Did the 220 Ds vote to block the bill? No. The committee chairs don't seem to have brought it to a vote in the two committees in was sent to, so 2 Ds blocked it. That makes the article misleading. Stretching the truth is wrong, whichever side does it.
    Agreed it's misleading that it wasn't put up for a vote. Also telling that a party doesn't care enough to pressure their committee members to do the right thing. If the party leadership wanted it to happen, it would.

    Like Joe Machin and other "centrists". No, they all vote for pelosi, Schumer and the like. They just want to be contrarian to get bribes to their district
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,232
    77
    Porter County
    Agreed it's misleading that it wasn't put up for a vote. Also telling that a party doesn't care enough to pressure their committee members to do the right thing. If the party leadership wanted it to happen, it would.

    Like Joe Machin and other "centrists". No, they all vote for pelosi, Schumer and the like. They just want to be contrarian to get bribes to their district
    I wonder what their issue is with the bill. I skimmed over it. There is a lot about testing different versions of fentanyl, which I am not clear as to why we need a bill for. Then there is making it a schedule 1 drug permanently, which I am surprised it isn't already.

    I wonder if he has reached out to the Ds to see what their issue is, or if this is another pure political stunt.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,232
    77
    Porter County
    I wonder what their issue is with the bill. I skimmed over it. There is a lot about testing different versions of fentanyl, which I am not clear as to why we need a bill for. Then there is making it a schedule 1 drug permanently, which I am surprised it isn't already.

    I wonder if he has reached out to the Ds to see what their issue is, or if this is another pure political stunt.
    Now I understand. Fentanyl is a schedule 2 drug currently. Moving it to schedule 1 would mean it could not be used by Drs.
     
    Top Bottom