Maybe if Trump had won, they might be a bit more inquisitive and less compliant.They would have to look into the mirror at themselves too in that case.
Maybe if Trump had won, they might be a bit more inquisitive and less compliant.They would have to look into the mirror at themselves too in that case.
They would have fought the vax in that scenario. Just like they were before the election.Maybe if Trump had won, they might be a bit more inquisitive and less compliant.
You’d think there’d be enough intellectual curiosity...
I mean, that one is gonna have a hard time getting the public behind it. Several weeks ago before it was widely known that it's mostly affecting gays, I talked to someone who is straight, and let's say, not right of center. Going on about monkey pox is spreading, better take all the precautions like covid. Masks. Vaccines. Lockdowns. I told him >95% of the spread is among gay men. He didn't believe me. So I showed him one of the several mainstream news sources who reported it. His demeanor changed.Great...if you don't die from Covid you die from the jab. "They" got you coming and going. Wait until the next big wave.....monkey pox? Or when they gather all the DNA from all the swabs and release the next pandemic at election time no doubt.
That 10K% increase in reports could be due to more people reporting it to VAERS because of awareness of vaccines, or just perception. But damn, if that number is true--I'm not gonna dig through VAERS to confirm it's 10K%--then it should at least spark curiosity.The Ethical Skeptic has been tracking these cancer deaths for awhile now. I may have posted some of those charts before. You’d think there’d be enough intellectual curiosity that journalists would be asking the powers that be to explain them.
Yeah, point of order. I should have disclaimed that 10k% figure. That’s huge. I strongly doubt his charts were showing anything of that magnitude. An unexplained increase—yes.That 10K% increase in reports could be due to more people reporting it to VAERS because of awareness of vaccines, or just perception. But damn, if that number is true--I'm not gonna dig through VAERS to confirm it's 10K%--then it should at least spark curiosity.
When something is out of the ordinary and curiosity fails, it's usually because fear of learning something potentially bad outweighs the curiosity. Like people who cough up blood might not go to the doctor for fear of learning they have cancer. That happened with a family member.
People who see these large increases might not investigate further for fear that vaccines might actually be causing high cancer rates, or that their pro-vaccine narrative purchased by pharma might be destroyed.
You might be surprised. I live in a mid-sized city in NE Indiana and see people alone in their cars, windows up, wearing a masks, every single day. There are PLENTY of people out there who don't mind the restrictions one bit.I mean, that one is gonna have a hard time getting the public behind it. Several weeks ago before it was widely known that it's mostly affecting gays, I talked to someone who is straight, and let's say, not right of center. Going on about monkey pox is spreading, better take all the precautions like covid. Masks. Vaccines. Lockdowns. I told him >95% of the spread is among gay men. He didn't believe me. So I showed him one of the several mainstream news sources who reported it. His demeanor changed.
There's a clear advantage in that regard to not having gay sex. I think for straight people, even left wing, it's gonna be a hard sale to get them to support the same kind of restrictions and mandates that we had with covid.
And likely still a reason that curiosity should spur investigation.Yeah, point of order. I should have disclaimed that 10k% figure. That’s huge. I strongly doubt his charts were showing anything of that magnitude. An unexplained increase—yes.
I think there is a newfound awareness of VAERS itself which would probably account for a piece of that action.Yeah, point of order. I should have disclaimed that 10k% figure. That’s huge. I strongly doubt his charts were showing anything of that magnitude. An unexplained increase—yes.
One would hope… but with the media and liberals and Biden I’m not holding my breath.I mean, that one is gonna have a hard time getting the public behind it. Several weeks ago before it was widely known that it's mostly affecting gays, I talked to someone who is straight, and let's say, not right of center. Going on about monkey pox is spreading, better take all the precautions like covid. Masks. Vaccines. Lockdowns. I told him >95% of the spread is among gay men. He didn't believe me. So I showed him one of the several mainstream news sources who reported it. His demeanor changed.
There's a clear advantage in that regard to not having gay sex. I think for straight people, even left wing, it's gonna be a hard sale to get them to support the same kind of restrictions and mandates that we had with covid.
Should have had this running total on the emergency use only experimental Injection and Booster inserts. Within the last few months people on this board have continued to discount these numbers. This was the warning shot at the start that was somehow ignored and the denial is ongoing. The division on this board is an epic reflection of society not willing to take a stand.VAERS report from Friday.
29,981 deaths from the vaccine. +191 this week.
33,247 life threating reactions
56,021 became disabled
170,749 Hospitalized with 426 being long term(more than 2 weeks)
201,489 went to a medical provider after vaccination for side effect treatment
132,951 went to an er for treatment after vaccination
1,622,882 total adverse events up 118.3%(accounts for people getting more than 1 shot) .
Study of VAERS. It historically has captured less than 2% of adverse events.
Been harping on this for about a year. Seems people don't like the term "child abuse". Best news I've seen in awhile and I really hope this is a global event. The people that implemented this in the US are child abusers. ****ing terrible!!