Mandated vaccines or weekly testing for employers of 100+ people.......

[JettaKnight]

Well that's a clickbait title of I've ever seen one.

Does anyone produce a video labeled "military takeover" when the NG fills sandbags at the levee?

 

[actaeon277]

Well that's a clickbait title of I've ever seen one.

Does anyone produce a video labeled "military takeover" when the NG fills sandbags at the levee?

okay. title sucks
what about what he says?

Such as.. gov "solves" a problem, creating another, which it "solves" creating another, and so on and so on

 

[JettaKnight]

okay. title sucks
what about what he says?

Don't care much for YouTube pontificators; follow the money.

 

[Alpo]

 

[BigRed]

Ok, I answered your question about mandates. I'm not getting into a philosophical discuss about govt authority.

It is too easy.

It ends right when the governed withdraw their consent.

 

[actaeon277]

misleading clickbait title.
he wasn't really dead yet.

 

[Victory106]

They are also forcing this vaccine for military members and they are looking to lose a good percentage of America's fighting force. I am currently in the reserve and the new date is June 2022 for us to be vaccinated. I will not be forced to do something that takes away my freedom that I swore to protect.

 

[Alpo]

misleading clickbait title.
he wasn't really dead yet.

You need to widen your perspective just a smidgen.

 

[printcraft]

Passive aggressive official note written by a huge dickhead. **** off already.

 

[JettaKnight]

Passive aggressive official note written by a huge dickhead. **** off already.

So, no counter argument?


If you're upset about "dead babies" in this vaccine, then are you consistent with that deeply held religious convinction, or selective?

 

[Keith_Indy]

Unions and contracts may not be of much help...

New Jersey appeals court forces unions to accept vaccine mandates, regardless of contracts

Judges admit Newark hasn't shown "any statute or regulation" that authorizes such mandates, but say it doesn't matter.

justthenews.com

"Freedoms just another word for nothing left to lose"

TBTB are going to regret putting people out of work. Give enough people "nothing left to lose" and they might get a bit unruly, even ungovernable.

 

[buckwacker]

So, no counter argument?


If you're upset about "dead babies" in this vaccine, then are you consistent with that deeply held religious convinction, or selective?

We shouldn't even be arguing about religious exemptions. We shouldn't need to. Neither the government nor your employer should be making medical decisions for you. People are desperately trying to hang on to their autonomy and all you can add is incessant criticism. I'm with printcraft. All the way off.

 

[buckwacker]

Unions and contracts may not be of much help...

New Jersey appeals court forces unions to accept vaccine mandates, regardless of contracts

Judges admit Newark hasn't shown "any statute or regulation" that authorizes such mandates, but say it doesn't matter.

justthenews.com

"Freedoms just another word for nothing left to lose"

TBTB are going to regret putting people out of work. Give enough people "nothing left to lose" and they might get a bit unruly, even ungovernable.

This is exactly what I've been saying. We'll find ourselves in the middle of an American Reign of Terror if they keep pushing, and that won't end well for anyone.

 

[jsharmon7]

So we're almost one month out from Biden announcing a vaccine mandate on the entire nation...so uh, what's the status?

OSHA hasn't actually issued the rule.

When they issue it, it will have a start date before it goes in effect.

Then it has to survive legal challenges from multiple states. It'll probably get hit with a national injunction and go to the Supreme Court.

It's amazing because the media has been talking for a month like it's already in effect.

And it did successfully distract news coverage from the Afghanistan disaster. I'm wondering if the actual ruling is on hold until the President's handlers need another distraction.

I’ve been saying since he made the announcement that legal challenges wouldn’t matter in any immediate or meaningful way. They knew it would be controversial. They knew it would be challenged in court. They knew there was a good chance they would lose. They don’t care.

They don’t care about legal battles because they’re playing with house money. They also know most large companies don’t care about the personal opinions of their employees. Most of them will go along with the mandate because it’s easier than trying to fight it. Plus, you can replace the holdouts. Most people will go along with it because it’s easier than trying to find a new job. Biden and his team aren’t stupid.

 

[Keith_Indy]

Plus, you can replace the holdouts. Most people will go along with it because it’s easier than trying to find a new job.

With record unemployment and record job openings the "easy to replace holdouts" may be a decision they regret.

Biden and his team aren’t stupid.

ROTFLMAO

Maybe not stupid, but incredibly short sighted.

 

[chiraqi]

They also know most large companies don’t care about the personal opinions of their employees. Most of them will go along with the mandate because it’s easier than trying to fight it. Plus, you can replace the holdouts.

Remember when the left at least pretended to be on the side of the working man

 

[JettaKnight]

We shouldn't even be arguing about religious exemptions. We shouldn't need to. Neither the government nor your employer should be making medical decisions for you. People are desperately trying to hang on to their autonomy and all you can add is incessant criticism. I'm with printcraft. All the way off.

But how far can you take a religious exemption? Can I demand I always have Sundays off? Can a jew i n a pork packing plant demand to touch no pork?

If you claim you can't take drug Z because of fetal tissue used in testing, but you're taking drugs A, B, and C that are tested in the same way, then an employer should have the right to tell you to pound sand on your bogus exemption.

Otherwise I'm creating a religion that says I don't have attend all-hands meetings.

I believe an employer should accommodate reasonable religious beliefs.

 

[Leadeye]

Unions and contracts may not be of much help...

New Jersey appeals court forces unions to accept vaccine mandates, regardless of contracts

Judges admit Newark hasn't shown "any statute or regulation" that authorizes such mandates, but say it doesn't matter.

justthenews.com

"Freedoms just another word for nothing left to lose"

TBTB are going to regret putting people out of work. Give enough people "nothing left to lose" and they might get a bit unruly, even ungovernable.

Strike?

 

[phylodog]

I believe an employer should accommodate reasonable religious beliefs.

Meaning those you approve of.

You can go to work with your **** hanging out of your pants while wearing lipstick and demand everyone call you Nancy but how dare you try to reject a "vaccine" that is so clearly good for your health. This country is ****ed beyond belief.

I wish the ****ing aliens would hurry up already.

 

[buckwacker]

But how far can you take a religious exemption? Can I demand I always have Sundays off? Can a jew i n a pork packing plant demand to touch no pork?

If you claim you can't take drug Z because of fetal tissue used in testing, but you're taking drugs A, B, and C that are tested in the same way, then an employer should have the right to tell you to pound sand on your bogus exemption.

Otherwise I'm creating a religion that says I don't have attend all-hands meetings.

I believe an employer should accommodate reasonable religious beliefs.

Do you even read the comments you reply to? WE SHOULDNT EVEN HAVE TO SEEK RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS. When my kids ask why I'm yelling, I tell them it's because you didn't pay attention to the words I spoke at a normal volume.