Democrat "Reverend" is nothing of the sort.
He also probably thinks he will run for president some day.
I doubt he would get the nomination even if he ran.Sad thing is he would probably beat Mitt Romney who is my guess to be the republican candidate in 2024.
I would certainly hope not, but then I hoped the old man wouldn't either.I doubt he would get the nomination even if he ran.
I disagree. If it isn't Trump I think DeSantis has a strong shot. I think Romney knows he has a lot of repair work to do to even hope to be re-elected as a senator and he will be mindful of what happened to ¡Jeb! in 2016. Being the CoC/Club for Growth candidate just isn't what it used to be. The party is not going to revert back to what it was, the Romneys of the world will have to form their own party. It would be hilarious to see him try to run as an independent, the only votes he could take away from Trump or a Trumpian candidate would not get him out of single digits. Romney is doneSad thing is he would probably beat Mitt Romney who is my guess to be the republican candidate in 2024.
Trump appointees aren't worth a damn!?!Only one on SCOTUS that’s worth a damn currently.
Nope. They haven’t done a damn thing worth applauding. I don’t care who appoints them, if they’re ****, theyre ****.Trump appointees aren't worth a damn!?!
I'd say they are worth a damn, maybe two damns in a stretch but they sure haven't lived up to the five damn expectations.Trump appointees aren't worth a damn!?!
Have we allowed the elites in the uniparty to set standards for the justices that will not allow judges we would approve of to get there?Nope. They haven’t done a damn thing worth applauding. I don’t care who appoints them, if they’re ****, theyre ****.
Democrat "Reverend" is nothing of the sort.
You do realize that the SCt can't really do anything unless or until a case is brought before them. That takes time.Nope. They haven’t done a damn thing worth applauding. I don’t care who appoints them, if they’re ****, theyre ****.
Ya, I’m just saying in the past 6 months they’ve refused to hear cases that they should have heard, and haven’t been particularly useful in any way to regain confidence in our judicial branch.You do realize that the SCt can't really do anything unless or until a case is brought before them. That takes time.
Id rather have them not take a case that they don't really need to than take one that ends up being bad for 2A purposes. The SCt is really the "long game" in our system.Ya, I’m just saying in the past 6 months they’ve refused to hear cases that they should have heard, and haven’t been particularly useful in any way to regain confidence in our judicial branch.
Right. I don't pretend to understand why they refuse to hear some cases but it sure seems to me that they are playing bystanders while the constitution is being attacked and eroded.Ya, I’m just saying in the past 6 months they’ve refused to hear cases that they should have heard, and haven’t been particularly useful in any way to regain confidence in our judicial branch.