9 Killed in Dayton Shooting

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    The nut job that shot Gabby Giffords (?) had a serious history known by all who had contact with him. He had been reported by the college he tried to attend and they showed him the door and called the sheriff. Nut jobs mom worked directly for the Sheriff if memory serves and so LEO was diverted from locking this particular nut down to save people.

    It will be an ongoing thing with these last 2 freaks as o what they have put out there.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    10,999
    113
    Avon
    This gets into an interesting area. Most everyone on INGO is against "red flag laws", until something like this happens and then we all say, "Why didn't someone report the red flags?" :scratch:

    As usual, the issue isn't a binary. The problem isn't red flag laws, per se. Rather, the issue is red flag laws that do not ensure due process.
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,726
    113
    Indianapolis
    So they're digging into the Dayton shooter's social media posts to decide that he was mentally ill, etc. My opinion: It's bull**** tactics. People say things on the internet. People are liars, and edgier, on the internet. Once you're dead, you're all out of context. Text, especially sarcastic text, doesn't translate well. So media-types will read what was said, word for word, and take it 100% at face value. There are such things as sarcastic/hate/ironic retweets... Just because someone RT'd something, doesn't mean they support it.

    But that context is gone when you're dead and can't defend yourself. So... No. I don't like pouring through social media to decide what "team" someone was on to attribute a motive. But people will do it, because it scores their tribe points.

    God forbid anyone here becomes "famous" enough to have their posts looked at... but you can guarantee your legacy will be a "racist insurrectionist" or some nonsense.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,228
    149
    Columbus, OH
    This gets into an interesting area. Most everyone on INGO is against "red flag laws", until something like this happens and then we all say, "Why didn't someone report the red flags?" :scratch:

    We're against red flag laws without iron clad due process protection for the accused. A kind of 'no fly list' for gun ownership where you can't refute the accusations nor appeal your presence on it is the nightmare, as would be it becoming just another tool for confiscation, just at a slower pace

    As others mentioned, where were the parents? Were they not informed about why he was suspended from school? Did they think their little angel was just going through a phase and didn't mean it? Is it safe to make that assumption without some proof? Did the lack of resources available for evaluation and trteatment influence their decision? To me it has some of the hallmarks of Parkland because the school system and affiliated LE, if any, did nothing official - and once again existing laws were likely adequate but not allowed to function as designed ​and he was able to purchase the weapons legally
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,228
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I haven't heard any significant discussion about motive. I assume that means it doesn't fit the anti-Trump, anti-conservative narrative?

    Nailed it. They can discern white supremacy in an instant, the motives of martyrs and satan worshipers are subject to a slower and more nuanced analysis
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,059
    113
    Uranus
    So they're digging into the Dayton shooter's social media posts to decide that he was mentally ill, etc. My opinion: It's bull**** tactics. People say things on the internet. People are liars, and edgier, on the internet. Once you're dead, you're all out of context. Text, especially sarcastic text, doesn't translate well. So media-types will read what was said, word for word, and take it 100% at face value. There are such things as sarcastic/hate/ironic retweets... Just because someone RT'd something, doesn't mean they support it.

    But that context is gone when you're dead and can't defend yourself. So... No. I don't like pouring through social media to decide what "team" someone was on to attribute a motive. But people will do it, because it scores their tribe points.

    God forbid anyone here becomes "famous" enough to have their posts looked at... but you can guarantee your legacy will be a "racist insurrectionist" or some nonsense.

    If people looked at my posts in retrospect they would think I'm really weird. I mean, could you imagine?
     

    STFU

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    17   0   0
    Sep 30, 2015
    2,465
    113
    Hamilton County

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,079
    113
    NWI
    37diph.jpg
     

    A 7.62 Exodus

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    31   0   0
    Sep 29, 2011
    1,164
    63
    Shreveport, LA
    So they're digging into the Dayton shooter's social media posts to decide that he was mentally ill, etc. My opinion: It's bull**** tactics. People say things on the internet. People are liars, and edgier, on the internet. Once you're dead, you're all out of context. Text, especially sarcastic text, doesn't translate well. So media-types will read what was said, word for word, and take it 100% at face value. There are such things as sarcastic/hate/ironic retweets... Just because someone RT'd something, doesn't mean they support it.

    But that context is gone when you're dead and can't defend yourself. So... No. I don't like pouring through social media to decide what "team" someone was on to attribute a motive. But people will do it, because it scores their tribe points.

    God forbid anyone here becomes "famous" enough to have their posts looked at... but you can guarantee your legacy will be a "racist insurrectionist" or some nonsense.
    Not sure I agree this this. At some point, behaviors become a pattern. Were you able to look over this guys twitter account before they nuked it? Every RT was from someone on the far-left, an Antifa member, and various tweets supporting communism/Democratic presidential candidates. I'm not trying to insinuate that this attack was politically motivated, but if the shoe was other the other foot, it would be a pretty safe bet. If the El Paso shooter had a prominent social media account sharing countless posts about how immigrants are a plague of the earth, then shoots up a Walmart full of people with Hispanic heritage, it's almost safe to assume at that point.

    Idk, maybe I'm missing your point. At face value, I do agree that people tend to be edgelords on the internet, but I think at some point the "meme" factor gets thrown out the window, and you're actually staring at how someone actually feels.

    This brings me to another point. Something about this shooting has really been bugging me. People are trying to write this guy off as some lunatic, which he probably is, but something about this feels too calculated. Here we have a hard leftist, who is constantly sharing posts about gun control, and how fascism has to go, and communism is the best. I have a hunch this guy was trying to go out as a left wing martyr. Think about it, he uses an AR pistol, with a "loophole" brace, multiple 100 round drum mags, and supposedly body armor. All the thing the left says we don't need. What are the odds that this guy donned all this things he hates in an attempt to drum up support to get these things banned? Plus, the shooting happened on the heels of a white nationalist attack. Why not keep the ball rolling, so to speak. Maybe I'm totally reading too much into this, but the whole thing smells fishy to me. Not like "false flag" fishy, but more along the lines of too many coincidences that are leaving me scratching me head.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    I'm finding it hard to move off the "sister" aspect. Sibling rivalry/disrespect, etc. So, take out sister and all of her friends and anyone nearby must have the same mindset...so take them out too.

    It might be as simple as that.
     

    Vigilant

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Jul 12, 2008
    11,659
    83
    Plainfield
    I'm finding it hard to move off the "sister" aspect. Sibling rivalry/disrespect, etc. So, take out sister and all of her friends and anyone nearby must have the same mindset...so take them out too.

    It might be as simple as that.
    im seeing that too, they came there together, and he shoots up the one particular place she is at, out of many different choices?
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,726
    113
    Indianapolis
    I'm finding it hard to move off the "sister" aspect. Sibling rivalry/disrespect, etc. So, take out sister and all of her friends and anyone nearby must have the same mindset...so take them out too.

    It might be as simple as that.

    Which means potential political affiliations are meaningless., not that that would stop either side from trying to score points on it.
     
    Top Bottom