There is just more feds and way more money.Don't disagree but due to a lack of primary voting participation and Rep pressure, it is the path best for a positive outcome. The Feds are 10x worse.
^^^^^No.
I will elaborate, as I have considered this and done a little research. Based upon my understanding (which may well be entirely wrong) a Constitutional Convention would open the entire Constitution up to amendment. In today's world without strict controls and prior agreements on scope that is a recipe for disaster.
IF you could get 38 States to pass the EXACT same Amendment, and the implementing State law required the delegates to vote for that Amendment and only that Amendment and for any unfaithful delegate to immediately be replaced by an alternate if they varied from the State law authorizing the Amendment you might have a chance.
The other 12 states would be fighting tooth and nail to Amend the Constitution with every SJW and communist ideal they could think up, along with whatever their corporate and foreign power brokers wanted.
The fundamental problem is there are no longer 38 States which have a majority of citizens who understand and support the Constitution of the United States of America (as written and amended).
You are missing the point...primary em aggressively with common sense Reps. If they remain, aggressively contact them. It will make a difference, giving up (generalizing) does nothing.There is just more feds and way more money.
But yes, state level but I have zero zip nanad even in that approach.
The snake has entwined itself as completely as possible into the system. Greed/power (same thing) drives these heads. So deeply that we seldom see much of a difference between the party's. If at all.