And this is the end goal and answers the the thread title question...That might be the one thing that would keep me from voting for Trump.
And this is the end goal and answers the the thread title question...That might be the one thing that would keep me from voting for Trump.
Sadly she is too greedy/impatient if that is the case. To get our votes will require her to walk the walk for a while. And she cant do that adequately in the time she has before its time to throw a hat in the ring.And this is the end goal and answers the the thread title question...
lolSadlyshe isthey are too greedy/impatient if that is the case.
If she were a less physically attractive candidate, I’d be more in agreement.To get our votes will require her to walk the walk for a while.
If the vote was taken away from elected democrats and all votes were based on the party planks would the outcome be any different? No!You don't think Republicans are divided on where the line is drawn on abortion? Or Democrats are lock step on magazine capacity laws? Republicans who were fine with gay marriage? Democrats that think only biologically female athletes should legally be allowed in women's locker rooms not and competing against Trans athletes?
Or anyone who disagrees on where ever the party hardliners put the rules is RINO / DINO?
There is and has been virtually no substance to Tulsi so far, but she has captured the attention of conservative males with her looks and a couple of snappy replies in debates.I have to assume that you were addressing this in part to me as well as others because I said the word "boobage" I was more talking about Padma Lakshmi because the pic that was posted was of her. She's attractive but I wouldn't vote for her if she were running for political office based on that any more than I would vote for Tulsi Gabbard for that reason.
You act like that was the only thing that was discussed. It was a brief sidetrack not started by me that I commented on and i identified it as a sidetrack. I've posted plenty about the relevant political issues concerning Tulsi Gabbard and her position on a number of topics in this thread that had nothing to do with her looks. Perhaps you missed those.
I don't think anyone in this thread has seriously suggested that they would vote for her or would potentially give her a pass based on looks alone.
For me personally it's not about superficial looks. She has to further earn that trust in deeds not just looks and words for me to even begin to consider supporting her in any capacity. I'm not even close to being there right now.
I've repeatedly said that I want to see more action on her part. (not talking about physical attributes)
Well, I don't think she is gonna join the Republican party. I certainly wouldn't vote for her, however, if Trump or DeSantis chose her as their running mate would I vote for them? Absolutely! OMG, the Democrats would go insane.There is and has been virtually no substance to Tulsi so far, but she has captured the attention of conservative males with her looks and a couple of snappy replies in debates.
I would normally find a bunch of old men drooling over her funny if the political stakes for the heart of our country were not so high…
As would I, I would prefer a better conservative on the ticket but to get the leader I want I will take whatever baggage we must deal with.Well, I don't think she is gonna join the Republican party. I certainly wouldn't vote for her, however, if Trump or DeSantis chose her as their running mate would I vote for them? Absolutely! OMG, the Democrats would go insane.
If the vote was taken away from elected democrats and all votes were based on the party planks would the outcome be any different? No!
If the vote was taken away from elected republicans and all votes were based on the party planks would the outcome be any different? Sure would, it would be far more conservative.
The political need is for a reliably conservative party, not a party between the communist and scocialist outcomes that occur when republicans govern to the whims of the most liberal.
Mancin is an outlier and a relic near retirement, when he is gone there are no more…
What leads you to believe that I would be just a "drooling old man" in favor of looks over substance when a vast majority of my posts have been about substance?There is and has been virtually no substance to Tulsi so far, but she has captured the attention of conservative males with her looks and a couple of snappy replies in debates.
I would normally find a bunch of old men drooling over her funny if the political stakes for the heart of our country were not so high…
So just who are the most extreme republicans and what are their views? I believe far fewer republican voters are dissatisfied because they are too far right than are unhappy they are too far left.We're talking voters, and your answer doesn't address the question posed. I didn't expect any answer to satisfy you in the slightest because you'd have to confront that reasonable minds can differ on where the line is drawn on some given topic.
Not all voters agree with everything their party, and the most extreme party members, campaign on. A 3rd party drawn from moderates from both major parties is unlikely to draw support from the uber-political of INGO any more than it is to draw support from Bernie Bros. That's not the target audience.
That post was not and is not about you. It was about the whole of the sentiments expressed in the several threads and post by many. Her looks and military service combined to make her interesting enough to get attention here a decorated vet would not get, even with the perfect platform.What leads you to believe that I would be just a "drooling old man" in favor of looks over substance when a vast majority of my posts have been about substance?
She's a leftist ***** using the nut jobs even further left to make her look reasonable by comparison.....but make no doubt....she is still a leftist *****.
Just trying to push left more slowly than most dems....just like most republicans.
True, but she is hot.
For many, that will be enough.
The entire context of what I posted…As evidenced by comments here; a pair of mammeries and silliness ensues…
So based on that you are making assumptions that anyone would vote for her based on looks alone over substance. Like I said before can you point to anyone here that has seriously stated they would consider supporting her based on looks alone? We're talking seriously and not presumptively on your part.The entire context of what I posted…
I don't see her becoming a running mate. I see her as being the new Ross Perot and stealing away votes.Well, I don't think she is gonna join the Republican party. I certainly wouldn't vote for her, however, if Trump or DeSantis chose her as their running mate would I vote for them? Absolutely! OMG, the Democrats would go insane.
That was the context of my reply, in addition to the context that she enjoys the attention of INGO to a degree that she does not deserve, based on number of threads started, the number of posts that describe her looks, and that more than once INGO has been fooled by the bikini photos…So based on that you are making assumptions that anyone would vote for her based on looks alone over substance. Like I said before can you point to anyone here that has seriously stated they would consider supporting her based on looks alone? We're talking seriously and not presumptively on your part.
Let’s be honest. If she looked like Lisa Murkowski, Nancy Pelosi, or Bella Abzug, holding all of the exact same positions she does now, few would care about this announcement.That was the context of my reply, in addition to the context that she enjoys the attention of INGO to a degree that she does not deserve, based on number of threads started, the number of posts that describe her looks, and that more than once INGO has been fooled by the bikini photos…
BINGO!Let’s be honest. If she looked like Lisa Murkowski, Nancy Pelosi, or Bella Abzug, holding all of the exact same positions she does now, few would care about this announcement.
Trust me it's not about looks for me personally. Superficially supporting looks alone will not get anyone here anywhere and anyone that seriously considers that are being foolish.That was the context of my reply, in addition to the context that she enjoys the attention of INGO to a degree that she does not deserve, based on number of threads started, the number of posts that describe her looks, and that more than once INGO has been fooled by the bikini photos…