Before I look, are you sure this isn’t law over policy?So Delta and American Airlines don't like voter ID, yet have no problem requiring them to get on to their transport devices.
Before I look, are you sure this isn’t law over policy?So Delta and American Airlines don't like voter ID, yet have no problem requiring them to get on to their transport devices.
Even so it’s the voter ID law they’re publicly complaining about.Before I look, are you sure this isn’t law over policy?
And they didn’t when the feds required them to do so?Even so it’s the voter ID law they’re publicly complaining about.
For trees. I think. Sounds like that anyhow.Rules for thee, but not...
I can't remember the end.
Anyone?
I don't think they complained about that. Them complaining about voter ID, which is unrelated to flying passengers to their destinations, is just woke ********. There's nothing wrong with requiring ID to help prove the person voting is the person registered to the address. As long as provisions are made to help people get the ID's who have a hard time getting them. Indiana's system passed the SCOTUS test. No reason others can't.And they didn’t when the feds required them to do so?
I don't think they complained about that. Them complaining about voter ID, which is unrelated to flying passengers to their destinations, is just woke ********. There's nothing wrong with requiring ID to help prove the person voting is the person registered to the address. As long as provisions are made to help people get the ID's who have a hard time getting them. Indiana's system passed the SCOTUS test. No reason others can't.
(Just catching up on my INGOing)
Knowing people's ID is beneficial. Airlines probably like the the government requirement because they can claim "government regulations" and not be the assholes. But OMG, asking for ID to improve the integrity of elections andWhat's baffling to me is that these same people never complain about ID being an issue anywhere else.
You can't get on a plane without an ID. You can't get a covid vaccine without an ID. You can't buy a gun without an ID.
Why do they never complain about those things?
Yes, the complained about it. People complained when they changed entry rules for Canada and Mexico. They complained when the “Real ID” became a requirement.I don't think they complained about that. Them complaining about voter ID, which is unrelated to flying passengers to their destinations, is just woke ********. There's nothing wrong with requiring ID to help prove the person voting is the person registered to the address. As long as provisions are made to help people get the ID's who have a hard time getting them. Indiana's system passed the SCOTUS test. No reason others can't.
(Just catching up on my INGOing)
No right is absolute. There is another side to it. There are competing interests. 1) the ability to vote on the people who will make the laws one is subject to. It’s not like if you hold the view I do, it precludes that belief. 2) the integrity of the election is also a right. No one should have a higher portion if the cote. One person, one vote. Also, no one from outside a district should have a vote in that district. It’s not a violation of the first principle to require proof of the 2nd. Voter ID is just one way to do that. As long as the measures put in place to assure the 2nd principle do not interfere with the 2nd, there is no problem at all.Yes, the complained about it. People complained when they changed entry rules for Canada and Mexico. They complained when the “Real ID” became a requirement.
We shall disagree about the ID requirement for voting.... I believe the ability to vote on the people who will make laws you are subject to is a right. You apparently disagree.
I mean. I’m not an avid fisherman. I don’t think I’ve been since I was a boy. But. Okay.
I’m just curious, if requiring an ID is infringing a right, what does that make requiring a background check?Yes, the complained about it. People complained when they changed entry rules for Canada and Mexico. They complained when the “Real ID” became a requirement.
We shall disagree about the ID requirement for voting.... I believe the ability to vote on the people who will make laws you are subject to is a right. You apparently disagree.
Carry on....I mean. I’m not an avid fisherman. I don’t think I’ve been since I was a boy. But. Okay.
If say the same. If the person is free enough that they can walk into a store, then they are free enough to purchase a firearm.I’m just curious, if requiring an ID is infringing a right, what does that make requiring a background check?
If they are free enough to walk across the border then they are free enough to vote.If say the same. If the person is free enough that they can walk into a store, then they are free enough to purchase a firearm.