The OFFICIAL Trump/HRC/2016 General Election Thread...

[AmmoManAaron]

"Libertarian VP Candidate Admits Defeat, Tells Voters To Pick Clinton Over Trump"

Note that this is coming from well-known anti-gunner William Weld of Massachusetts. The title of the article is click-bait, but he does imply that.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bill-weld-tells-voters-pick-clinton-over-trump

 

[printcraft]

"Libertarian VP Candidate Admits Defeat, Tells Voters To Pick Clinton Over Trump"

Note that this is coming from well-known anti-gunner William Weld of Massachusetts. The title of the article is click-bait, but he does imply that.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bill-weld-tells-voters-pick-clinton-over-trump

Yep.
Many of his policies and attitudes, and johnsons as well, are closer tied to hitlary and the demoncrats than the Republicans.
No new here.

 

[dusty88]

"Libertarian VP Candidate Admits Defeat, Tells Voters To Pick Clinton Over Trump"

Note that this is coming from well-known anti-gunner William Weld of Massachusetts. The title of the article is click-bait, but he does imply that.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bill-weld-tells-voters-pick-clinton-over-trump

No he doesn't.

That's old and Weld has pointed out that they took it out of context because his next sentence (after the Trump negatives) was about what their campaign offered.

Edit: Johnson btw vetoed gun control laws in New Mexico while Trump was calling for gun bans.

 

[printcraft]

[video=youtube;-xlmU9LvtAs]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xlmU9LvtAs[/video]

What a dick.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Lie, or is he misinformed?

Trump suggests the polls are wrong: "I actually think we're winning," and "we're way ahead in virtually every state"

 

[foszoe]

Lie, or is he misinformed?

Internal polling

 

[rvb]

WTF? TWD Spoiler Alerts! dammit.
There is a thread for that, which I was avoiding.

-rvb

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Internal polling

I read elsewhere he's spending very little on internal polling, so how would that feasibly be the answer?

I also don't find it feasible that every other independent poll is wrong.

 

[jamil]

who the **** is Neegan?

 

[indiucky]

who the **** is Neegan?

Batman's dad....

 

[indiucky]

WTF? TWD Spoiler Alerts! dammit.
There is a thread for that, which I was avoiding.

-rvb

Sorry...Negan's everywhere and we are all Negan.....

 

[mrjarrell]

I read elsewhere he's spending very little on internal polling, so how would that feasibly be the answer?

The poll numbers are coming to him in visions.

 

[BugI02]

I read elsewhere he's spending very little on internal polling, so how would that feasibly be the answer?

I also don't find it feasible that every other independent poll is wrong.

If I understand you correctly, if one thinks everyone else is wrong and he or she is right, then that person is certainly wrong (or crazy)

You don't find that ironic?

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Not sure how they get these numbers... I'd think they're a bit high... but definitely believe they'd be above Clinton, instead of consistently below.

How would other GOP candidates be performing against Hillary right now?

• Rubio: +8
• Kasich: +12
• Cruz: (Tied)

https://www.yahoo.com/katiecouric/2...pments-from-the-campaign-trail-140340216.html

 

[indiucky]

1980....Carter up by 8-11 points in the polls...Race was called at 8:05 pm before California polls had even closed....Reagan, an outsider with a background in entertainment was declared the winner.........

I have the same feeling now as I had then....(With less vitality of course, I have aged a bit since then...)

 

[pudly]

• Rubio: +8
• Kasich: +12
• Cruz: (Tied)

So, pretty much the worse they were in the primaries, the better they are against Hillary?

 

[Kutnupe14]

So, pretty much the worse they were in the primaries, the better they are against Hillary?

It's called buyer remorse

 

[dusty88]

It's called buyer remorse

I don't think it's just that. The DNCs research (as seen in Wikileaks) showed several that would beat her, especially Rand Paul.

 

[1DOWN4UP]

So, pretty much the worse they were in the primaries, the better they are against Hillary?

That make perfect sense in this parallel universe.

 

[BugI02]

Not sure how they get these numbers... I'd think they're a bit high... but [STRIKE]definitely believe they'd be above Clinton, instead of consistently below.[/STRIKE] what the heck, they fit the narrative so I'll post them anyway

Fixy