The election shenanigans thread

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,050
    113
    North Central


    “Some Twitter users noted that people were showing more hostility for Lake proving ‘fraud’ than the actual ‘fraud’ itself.”
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota

    Well they are phony signatures so they are not signatures of voters so there is no crime for copying them.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,199
    149
    Columbus, OH


    In my best jamil voice "There's no proof the election was stolen"

    especially not when you rely on the authorities to investigate themselves
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,669
    113
    Gtown-ish
    In my best jamil voice "There's no proof the election was stolen"

    especially not when you rely on the authorities to investigate themselves
    Get it right. “No proof of Kraken”

    Go back and review what I’ve said about Kari Lake.

    In my best Bug voice, “I got two hands and I still can’t find my ass.”
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    29,050
    113
    North Central
    Here is where the left is taking over the administration of elections.

    It is now a quaint notion that there will be a small advantage to the party that runs elections but their primary motivation is to keep things fair and legal. Maybe it always was, but this is getting out of hand…

     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,669
    113
    Gtown-ish


    If you don’t want to hear Democrats whining about the video being played, skip to about 5:20.

    The important part I think is that the poll officials on site discovered that regular computer paper worked fine, so they started using that. Then got a call from their bosses and were told to go back to using provisional ballots.

    Can we prove intent? No. The effect is disenfranchisement either way. But a critically thinking person would have a lot of reasons to suspect there is some intent there.

    Taking for granted that the reporting is accurate, how do you run out of paper and tell poll workers to use provisional ballots, indefinitely, when you can just go to staples and get the “right” paper? One would have to suspend disbelief to imagine that someone could be this incompetent!

    When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. How can one argue that the people in charge had any interest in people’s votes being counted?

    Of course, if the reporting was accurate. Would have been nice to see her interview the poll workers.
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,411
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Sure makes you wonder how much of this goes uncaught?

    With dems in power and in charge of polling in nearly all metro areas, (certainly in the "swing states,) gotta wonder if it's just the blatantly obvious idiots who are caught?


    .


    No No No!

    Have you not heard? There is no election fraud!


    The republic has been dead for at least 160 years....Be sure to vote!!!
     
    Top Bottom