Taiwan vs. China Watch Thread

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,508
    149
    Indiana
    This one sounds pretty weak, even for Zero Hedge.



    Read as: Taiwan reeally wants a nuclear deterrent against invasion. PLEASE Uncle Sam, won't you protect us like S. Korea & Japan?

    Of course they're in talks. Like they have been for decades.
    There's no chance in hell we would make such a commitment and poke that dragon in the eye.
    Sky news(Canadian and Australian mainstream).

    IBT(leftist business news,hq in New York).

    And ZH source is https://www.firstpost.com/world/tai...korea-to-deter-chinese-invasion-12649852.html (A company owned by Forbes and NBC).
     

    rosejm

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Nov 28, 2013
    1,783
    129
    NWI
    Sky news(Canadian and Australian mainstream).

    IBT(leftist business news,hq in New York).

    And ZH source is https://www.firstpost.com/world/tai...korea-to-deter-chinese-invasion-12649852.html (A company owned by Forbes and NBC).
    And they're all saying the same thing: Taiwanese Foreign Minister claims to be "in talks", with no further details about the claim or those "talks". It's almost as if the quote is the only verifiable piece of information.

    I fully believe Wu did make that claim. I would expect it's a matter of public record.
    However, just because there are multiple sources quoting his claim doesn't make it any more believable.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,050
    113
    Uranus

    Evacuating Americans – a fraught history

    U.S. policy states that the government may assist with an evacuation of American citizens under the right conditions, but it doesn’t guarantee such support. The Biden administration has come under fire for not providing enough help to Americans – most recently in Sudan, where heavy fighting erupted in April. The U.S. initially said it would not conduct an evacuation because few people had requested one; later, the government reversed its position and arranged several convoys out of Khartoum.

    In the case of Afghanistan, hundreds of Americans and tens of thousands of Afghans who worked for the U.S. were left behind in the frenetic and dangerous last days of the evacuation from Kabul. That experience likely weighs heavily on the minds of U.S. officials working on plans for Taiwan, Cancian said.

    “The tension is that the U.S. government wouldn’t want to pull personnel out too soon because that would signal lack of confidence,” he said. “But they wouldn’t want to wait too late because then they wouldn’t be able to get everyone out.”

    Sounds like the plans will probably amount to:

     

    Route 45

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Dec 5, 2015
    15,177
    113
    Indy

    DadSmith

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 21, 2018
    22,876
    113
    Ripley County

    I'm putting this here because I think all of this ties together if war breaks out it will be all over Asia.
     

    Route 45

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Dec 5, 2015
    15,177
    113
    Indy

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,924
    113
    .

    Sounds like what the USSR did with the Tu 22 Backfire years ago.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,924
    113
    .

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,508
    149
    Indiana

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,508
    149
    Indiana
    24 miles off target? That's a lot even for a nuc.
    Depends on how big a nuke. The tzar bomb leveled wooden structures in a 34 mile radius. 62 miles away the heat was still enough to cause instant 3rd degree burns. It broke windows out as far as 520 miles away. The shock wave in the air traveled around the earth 3 times.

    Yes,many smaller more accurate nukes would be more effective militarily, but the impact of a single large nuke could be much more psychologically damaging to your enemy.

    The Pentagon’s 2022 report to Congress estimated that by 2030 China’s nuclear stockpile “will have about 1,000 operational nuclear warheads, most of which will be fielded on systems capable of ranging the continental United States” (US Department of Defense 2022a, 97).
     
    Top Bottom