Don't sell drugs or have a baby where you sell drugs and you won't get flash banged.
So, you're suggesting that the presence of the baby caused the police to use the grenade?
Don't sell drugs or have a baby where you sell drugs and you won't get flash banged.
Just say'n.So, you're suggesting that the presence of the baby caused the police to use the grenade?
Hopefully this sheds some new light on the rationale............. the more you know.......
I have gone popcorn.
Anyone have a Sprite.....anyone
Aaahhhhhhhhh
Thanks man. I owe you.
Take a good look. This is what came crashing through that door. This is what blew up in that baby's face.
[video=youtube;s4VJaNVHa88]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4VJaNVHa88[/video]
I scanned through this thread and I think I've got it all now -
Cops are Bad
Drugs are Good
Laws are Bad
Criminals are Good
I scanned through this thread and I think I've got it all now -
Cops are Bad
Drugs are Good
Laws are Bad
Criminals are Good
Rob377 is 10yrs old
Popcorn stocks are Soaring
General Political Section is always entertaining.
What I'm saying is that the baby had the gernade stashed because of drugs. The cops just set it off. If you sell drugs, don't cry because you broke and are breaking the law and your **** and family gets ****ed up because of it.So, you're suggesting that the presence of the baby caused the police to use the grenade?
now that I think about it, sprite does go very well with popcorn. I think there's a can left in the fridge. Crap. No popcorn except the microwave stuff. Eh, it'll have to do.
Flash bangs are the proper tactic when raiding a drug house.So it's all fair game for the Po-Po to use/misuse whatever tactics they want? Why not just drone strike the SOBs then and hold the parents responsible for the whole block getting blown up?
No sorry but I strongly disagree with my whole beingSeems to be the conclusion. A law is a law no matter how much it sucks. Break it, pay it. I may not agree with something, but this is the hand we are dealt.
I know cops that would give up a "job" any day to not compromise their integrityThe question that you are posing is plausible. Try being the guy who's family lives on that paycheck and who's job is on the line if they don't do as the directed. This seams like someone had filed the proper paperwork and there was enough evidence for a magistrate to sign off on the warant. Unfortunately a child was harmed. But they did their job properly. The law may be something debateable, their tactics were not.
I think many of us are questioning the need to raid a "drug house" in the first place.
You pretty much skipped reading the thread and the article did't you?The question that you are posing is plausible. Try being the guy who's family lives on that paycheck and who's job is on the line if they don't do as the directed. This seams like someone had filed the proper paperwork and there was enough evidence for a magistrate to sign off on the warant. Unfortunately a child was harmed. But they did their job properly. The law may be something debateable, their tactics were not.
I'm questioning the the need to call multiple people in this thread an idiot.I think many of us are questioning the need to raid a "drug house" in the first place.