Mitch changes tune

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • CarmelHP

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    7,633
    48
    Carmel
    I've been expecting this, but it came a bit earlier than I expected. I thought he would wait until after November.

    Indiana's Daniels reluctant but 'open' to White House run
    By Dan Balz, Washington Post

    Add one more name to the list of possible 2012 Republican candidates
    for president: Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels.

    Two months ago, in an interview in his state capitol office, Daniels
    said explicitly he was not interested in running for president and
    dismissed speculation that he might be a candidate. That has now
    changed. During an interview at the winter meeting of the National
    Governors Association here over the weekend, Daniels said he has now
    been persuaded to keep open the door to a possible candidacy.

    Daniels said he has had a number of conversations in recent months --
    "none initiated by me" -- where the question of a 2012 campaign came
    up. "Just to get them off my back, I agreed to a number of people that
    I will now stay open to the idea," he said.

    Among the people he has talked with is former president George W.
    Bush, though Daniels said it was not that conversation per se that
    tipped him to reopen a door he had seemingly closed.

    Daniels served as Bush's director of the Office of Management and
    Budget before returning to Indiana to run for office and was White
    House political director under former president Ronald Reagan. He won
    a landslide reelection victory in 2008 at the same time that President
    Obama was carrying Indiana in the presidential race.

    Early in his tenure as governor, Daniels angered conservatives when he
    raised taxes to help balance the state budget. Since then, however, he
    has become a favorite of fiscal hawks for the way he has run his
    state. Though conservative on social issues, Daniels has not made them
    a focal point of his political agenda.

    In the aftermath of the party's defeats in 2006 and 2008, Daniels was
    critical of the Republican Party for having abandoned its principles.
    He warned that Republicans would have to "spend time in the penalty
    box" and earn back the public's trust before they would be returned to
    power. He also warned against complacency in the battle for ideas.

    Daniels joins a growing list of possible 2012 candidates for the GOP
    nomination. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Minnesota Gov.
    Tim Pawlenty are active in their preliminary preparations. Mississippi
    Gov. Haley Barbour continues to decline to close the door, while
    playing down the probability that he will run. Speculation about
    former Alaska governor Sarah Palin bubbles along at a feverish pace.

    Former House speaker Newt Gingrich has said he will decide after the
    November elections. Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee says he is
    happy as a television host but remains a possible contender. South
    Dakota Sen. John Thune may be the next to receive what one GOP
    operative called a microburst of publicity if he begins to take
    affirmative steps toward exploring a candidacy. Other potential
    candidates may emerge through the elections in 2010.

    Daniels said Sunday that he is not taking any preliminary steps, and
    instead would spend the next year focused on the problems of his
    state.

    "I've got my hands full, trying to keep things glued together and take
    care of people who are sideswiped here, do the most essential things
    in state government, keep ourselves fiscally above water," Daniels
    said. "Two, I've got some major goals [and] there's a real chance of
    achieving in this job."

    He said he would need "a friendly legislature" to accomplish his
    goals, and said that seemed possible given the more favorable climate
    for Republicans in this year's elections.

    "From now to a year-plus from now, that's all I'm going to do," he
    said. "And if these people are still around, and still not fully
    satisfied with the field, and if I don't see anybody who's raising
    what I think of as the survival issues for the country, I guess I'd
    listen, if it's not too late, which it might well be. I've told people
    if it's too late, so be it."

    Two months ago, saying "we're going to have to have some grown-up
    conversations in this country," Daniels alluded to the survival issues
    that he believes need to be raised by some presidential candidate in
    the future: debt and deficits, and the size and role of government.

    On fiscal matters, he said, "It is one thing for people to say, 'oh my
    gosh, this is unaffordable -- these deficits, these entitlements,
    these unfounded liabilities. We're going to hand our children' -- and
    we are -- 'a horrible, unpayable burden.' It will be another when
    people find out exactly what it would take to prevent that."

    Daniels said it's possible the fiscal crisis has reached a tipping
    point. He described the growth of government as another potential
    tipping point in the political life of the United States.

    "Are we still a country where people would prefer freedom, personal
    autonomy, with the risks and responsibilities that go with it, or do
    we want to socialize all the risks we can and settle for what I think
    is the false security of statism and so forth?" he asked. "I think
    those questions have got to be presented by somebody."

    Daniels acknowledged that the solutions to the problems of debt and
    deficits could involve sacrifices that would make the messenger
    unpopular. He admitted that making those problems the focal point of a
    Republican campaign could impede a potential comeback by the party.
    But he said he has become convinced that the issues will have to be
    raised in any case.

    Whether that will lead him to run for president in 2012 is very much
    an open question. Daniels still sounds like a reluctant entry. But in
    acknowledging that he has moved off his once-staunch opposition to
    running, he may find a forum to talk about some of those survival
    issues he thinks need raising.
     
    Last edited:

    Indy_Guy_77

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Apr 30, 2008
    16,576
    48
    He'll never make it.

    In the land of radio only...perhaps.

    But Our Man Mitch is too short and too balding. BAD bad BAD for TV. Unfortunately.

    Plus there's too much "Bush history" there.

    -J-
     

    Shoots4Fun

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    74   0   0
    Dec 21, 2008
    1,771
    38
    Indianapolis, IN
    I think he has enough good business sense to do an excellent job in the white house. Unfortunately, you guys are probably right about his connections to Bush...

    My :twocents:...
     

    homeless

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 12, 2008
    574
    18
    indy
    While I didn't vote for him, I do like the job he has done for the most part. I certainly like his "maybe" better than most other people. He certainly would make a good Candidate; well spoken, likable, and accomplished. But he may not have the hair to get enough people behind him.

    I have supported most of Daniel's policies as Governor, but he isn't exactly what I want. He makes a very good compromise, and I think I would rather see him in Congress than as POTUS. Mitch is a little to comfortable with big government for my tastes.
     

    wtfd661

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 27, 2008
    6,468
    63
    North East Indiana
    Hopefully the sheep will be so fed up with obama's :poop: that the won't care about Mitch being short and bald and will actually look at the man's substance and ethic's.

    Ok I know I'm living in a dream world but please don't wake me.

    Mitch has my vote for President. :yesway:
     

    Indy_Guy_77

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Apr 30, 2008
    16,576
    48
    I'd vote for him in a primary...for sure.

    But seriously, he won't be the GOP candidate for the reasons I've mentioned above.

    The cameras don't like him...

    Now, if he were to want a seat in Congress or the Senate.. . NOW we're talking.

    But the timing of that ain't all that grand.

    Besides, I highly doubt that he'd ever want to go back to Washington, in any capacity.

    -J-
     

    j706

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    60   0   1
    Dec 4, 2008
    4,160
    48
    Lizton
    Hopefully the sheep will be so fed up with obama's :poop: that the won't care about Mitch being short and bald and will actually look at the man's substance and ethic's.

    Ok I know I'm living in a dream world but please don't wake me.

    Mitch has my vote for President. :yesway:

    Same here! We have states all around us crumbling. The man has had to make some unpopular decisions to some,but we are much better off than others for it. He has my vote.:yesway:
     

    Woodsman

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 19, 2009
    1,275
    36
    New albany
    Are we trying to elect someone capable of doing the job or another Breck girl? The he!! with pretty, I want someone who can do the job and not blow smoke up my rear.

    If this gets turned into a beauty contest we'll end up with another Hollywood type or worse.

    One thing I would be interested in seeing from Gov. Daniels... If he doesn't throw around Pres. Reagan's name like some of the other wankers who think this gives them instant credibility as a conservative.
     

    homeless

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 12, 2008
    574
    18
    indy
    One thing I would be interested in seeing from Gov. Daniels... If he doesn't throw around Pres. Reagan's name like some of the other wankers who think this gives them instant credibility as a conservative.

    Because of 86 invoking Reagan does not inspire confidence with me.
     

    chraland51

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    May 31, 2009
    1,096
    38
    Camby Area
    We could do a lot worse than Governor Daniels. I would certainly vote for him over most of the likely republican candidates. He is trying to do a good job for our State. Just about the only thing that I am in disagreement with is the I69 Indy to Evansville project. That was not under his control and had already moved too far forward for him to stop so he just had to jump on the bandwagon. Leasing the toll road to the Australian/Spanish consortium was a good idea. That road has been nothing but a money pit for the state since the day it was opened. We just might get it back a lot sooner than the 75 year lease since they seem to be having much difficulty in making a profit.
     

    tenring

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 16, 2008
    1,999
    38
    Martinsville
    He could have stopped the I-69 project as it stands now if he had wanted to, but he didn't. Now the projected cost is almost 3 times the original cost to get down south 14 minutes quicker, and the maintainance added on, they can't keep up with what they got now. Boondoggle in the works with temporary jobs to build it, then the only way is to lease it out.
     

    homeless

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 12, 2008
    574
    18
    indy
    They should have been working on building an outer loop around indy, or fixing the northern part of 69, not making is farther south. The whole thing is a giant fiasco for nothing, Seriously who wants to go to Evansville?
     

    Armed & Christian

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Feb 19, 2009
    410
    16
    MSG2 S.E. INDY
    Mitch is a little to comfortable with big government for my tastes.


    Clear on that. Another thing about him that bothers/worries me is his willingness to swallow whatever line he is being fed by the fedgov. When I wrote to him (several times) and presented evidence about the unconstitutionality and fiscal untenability of REAL ID, his only response was basically that he supports it because the government tells us that they need it to fight terrorists.
     

    djl02

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Sep 18, 2009
    1,406
    36
    Indiana
    I didnt pay much attention to politics until recently, so I cant remember but, who was governer , when Indiana had a 200 plus million surplus? and who was it that had us in a 400 million dollar deficet in a couple years after intering office?
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    I didnt pay much attention to politics until recently, so I cant remember but, who was governer , when Indiana had a 200 plus million surplus? and who was it that had us in a 400 million dollar deficet in a couple years after intering office?

    That would be Evan Bayh. And Daniels got us back to a surplus very soon after O'Bannon and Kernan had been in office.
     
    Top Bottom