Missouri Sheriff Vs. the Feds!

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    :dunno: I guess we are in favor of Sanctuary cities now.

    states rights?
    I think there's a middle ground.

    I have no problem with a local official (sheriff/mayor/etc.) saying that, as an act of executive discretion, they will not enforce or assist in the enforcement of a federal law. (Or even a state law, but that's an even different issue.)

    At that point, it is a political decision. If the local constituency approves, they will re-elect. If not, they won't.

    To JTscribe's point, the refusal to enforce is an act of civil disobedience and can be honorable.

    Threatening to arrest LEOs for enforcing laws that one doesn't agree with is VERY different. That's an act of hostility.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    I don't know how close it is to "jury nullification" but my (relatively informed) opinion is that Indiana juries reach the right result FAR more often than not.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    I don't know how close it is to "jury nullification" but my (relatively informed) opinion is that Indiana juries reach the right result FAR more often than not.
    Have you had a jury walk a defendant because the law is full of crap?
     
    Top Bottom