I said, " I think theres a case some were armed". Keyword here is SOME.If you think using a flag pole to smack someone with is armed insurrection, then I guess you might as well classify almost every protest ever as such.
Armed insurrection would not have resulted in politicians returning to work the next day.
No. That’s not “armed” unless you really want to make it sound worse than it was.when they report it as an “armed” insurrection the public naturally believes that there was a bunch of people who forced their way in guns drawn. That’s obviously not true.I think theres a case that some were armed. Maybe a lawyer on here can help, but if you're getting beat with an American flag is that not a makeshift weapon, and if so would that be considered armed?
C’mon man. Yeah that’s a reach.I dont think its a reach. I think if someone was coming at you with a flag pole and attempting to cause harm to you with it, you'd shoot the guy because its being used as a weapon.
Well I disagree. Im not saying i believe everyone there or anyone that i even know of had firearms which is largely what people think of when they hear armed. The definition of armed doesn't limit itself to just firearms though.No. That’s not “armed” unless you really want to make it sound worse than it was.when they report it as an “armed” insurrection the public naturally believes that there was a bunch of people who forced their way in guns drawn. That’s obviously not true.
The truth doesn't matter to the left. They really, really, really want to use the term "armed insurrection" because it conjures up mental images of people ready for full-on battle. They will lie their ass off to justify it.
Well I disagree. Im not saying i believe everyone there or anyone that i even know of had firearms which is largely what people think of when they hear armed. The definition of armed doesn't limit itself to just firearms though.
In modern times, when combined with "insurrection", yes it does. How is anyone going to have an insurrection without guns? Make people die of laughter?Well I disagree. Im not saying i believe everyone there or anyone that i even know of had firearms which is largely what people think of when they hear armed. The definition of armed doesn't limit itself to just firearms though.
Well, sure. You can be “armed” with a baseball bat. But you seem to be working very hard to make this technically an “armed” insurrection. The people who were “armed” with Molotov cocktails were just peaceful protesters, right?Well I disagree. Im not saying i believe everyone there or anyone that i even know of had firearms which is largely what people think of when they hear armed. The definition of armed doesn't limit itself to just firearms though.
Well hold on. The left is pretty ****ing violent as it is. But we’re just talking about the fringes because the sane people don’t go around doing that ****. If it were the right being violent, let’s be realistic, it would just be the fringes because the sane right wouldn’t do it.P.S. If the right really wanted to get AS violent as the left does every single day, there wouldn't be a single politician left and we'd be drafting a new constitution to make sure things never got this bad again.
What about the left fringes in congress? I am not talking about violence, but they are doing things that the sane people wouldn't do across the entire sane political spectrum - but it affects everybody.Well hold on. The left is pretty ****ing violent as it is. But we’re just talking about the fringes because the sane people don’t go around doing that ****. If it were the right being violent, let’s be realistic, it would just be the fringes because the sane right wouldn’t do it.
What about the left fringes in congress? I am not talking about violence, but they are doing things that the sane people wouldn't do across the entire sane political spectrum - but it affects everybody.
A molotov cocktail is armed, and theres nothing peaceful about it. Im not working very hard at all, the definition of armed doesnt change based on who a person voted for.Well, sure. You can be “armed” with a baseball bat. But you seem to be working very hard to make this technically an “armed” insurrection. The people who were “armed” with Molotov cocktails were just peaceful protesters, right?
Well hold on. The left is pretty ****ing violent as it is. But we’re just talking about the fringes because the sane people don’t go around doing that ****. If it were the right being violent, let’s be realistic, it would just be the fringes because the sane right wouldn’t do it.
What about the left fringes in congress? I am not talking about violence, but they are doing things that the sane people wouldn't do across the entire sane political spectrum - but it affects everybody.
The definition of armed changes with context. It’s hyperbole to say what happened on 1/6 was an armed insurrection.A molotov cocktail is armed, and theres nothing peaceful about it. Im not working very hard at all, the definition of armed doesnt change based on who a person voted for.