I was searching for some magazines for my new H&K P2000sk. One of my hits was to this page:
https://gunmagwarehouse.com/heckler-koch-hk-usp9-p2000-9mm-10-round-magazine-with-finger-rest.html
I reviewed the Product Description:
So I ordered some of them. I get them in the mail and open one up and put it in the pistol and it is too long. I realize then that this is for the P2000 not the P2000sk. I write them about it. It seems it is my fault. They will let me return at my expense any unopened magazines. Is it just me or does it seem like the Product Description is misleading if not completely incorrect?
https://gunmagwarehouse.com/heckler-koch-hk-usp9-p2000-9mm-10-round-magazine-with-finger-rest.html
I reviewed the Product Description:
his is a P2000SK/USP Compact 9mm 10-round magazine.Built from tough blued steel with polymer follower and baseplate, these factory replacement magazines are engineered to deliver maximum reliability when used with USP Compact and P200SK pistols in 9mm.
HK’s USP is one of the most revered and trusted modern combat pistols, with a track record of battle-proven performance, reliability and accuracy that few other pistols can match. The P2000 elevated the platform even further, improving upon most of the strengths of the USP compact while improving ergonomics and handling.
HK magazines meet the same strict specifications as your original equipment mags, ensuring optimum fit and function with USP Compact and P200SK pistols.
Grab a few spare magazines for your USP Compact/P2000SK pistols today! And don’t forget to rotate your concealed carry magazines every 1-3 months in order to maximize service life and minimize unnecessary wear.
So I ordered some of them. I get them in the mail and open one up and put it in the pistol and it is too long. I realize then that this is for the P2000 not the P2000sk. I write them about it. It seems it is my fault. They will let me return at my expense any unopened magazines. Is it just me or does it seem like the Product Description is misleading if not completely incorrect?