I have heard projection is a thing.
It sure is…If you had reading comprehension you would undersyand that is what I said, when I said you guys are afraid to think about this.
I have heard projection is a thing.
It sure is…If you had reading comprehension you would undersyand that is what I said, when I said you guys are afraid to think about this.
So I’m guessing you didn’t date any “men” with man buns?
Never!So I’m guessing you didn’t date any “men” with man buns?
No, there are 4K projectors, even almost affordable. Probably when my beloved 65” curved Sony dies, I’ll get a projector. But if I’m not dead by the time the sony dies they’ll have holographic projectors.I was gonna buy one of those, but got a tv instead. I don’t think projectors get 4K, so figured I’d get more entertainment from a television.
Also, I only said that because he said that earlier. I’ve learned usually people are guilty of that which they accuse of others.
I think I comprehended things just fine.It sure is…
FailI think I comprehended things just fine.
I remember when my sister in law was a teeny-bopper, she talked about liking what she called the “sensitive pony tail” men. 14 years old? I seriously doubt she was on the pill. Sometimes preference’s are more complicated than one study.Never!
Here is my post suggesting it yesterday…Are you afraid to think you or your spouse may have actually chosen differently? LOL
Nah. That was a mocking post so obviously he was taking advantage of your wording.Fail
That is not what the studies (not one, dozens over 70 years) indicate. Are you trolling me here? There is a spectrum of male mates females find attractive. That spectrum is shifted to more effeminate males for those females on birth control pills. To insert a “teeny-bopper” infatuation as evidence that the studies are wrong is silliness.I remember when my sister in law was a teeny-bopper, she talked about liking what she called the “sensitive pony tail” men. 14 years old? I seriously doubt she was on the pill. Sometimes preference’s are more complicated than one study.
And if you had reading comprehension you’d understand I said the reason I said that is because you said it earlier.If you had reading comprehension you would undersyand that is what I said, when I said you guys are afraid to think about this.
I find topics like this fascinating. Would have enjoyed discussion of it and potential affects on society…And if you had reading comprehension you’d understand I said the reason I said that is because you said it earlier.
Fail.
I agree, but It isn’t a discussion if you aren’t willing to give and take and come into the discussion open minded. Telling everyone they’re wrong because a study says so isn’t a discussion.I find topics like this fascinating. Would have enjoyed discussion of it and potential affects on society…
If we cannot agree on the foundation of the topic discussion is impossible. Rephrased, if we cannot agree that 70 years of studies indicating birth control pills affect the choices people make in mates, how can we discuss what those choices are doing to society at large?I agree, but It isn’t a discussion if you aren’t willing to give and take and come into the discussion open minded. Telling everyone they’re wrong because a study says so isn’t a discussion.
I don't see a cause and effect between female birth control and men turning into wussies.
No, not really. How does science explain the ladies on the pill that aren't attracted to effeminate men?Have you ever looked?
This is a response based on binary thinking. Men are not just either manly or effeminate. The science says women select more effeminate men on the pill because of hormonal changes.No, not really. How does science explain the ladies on the pill that aren't attracted to effeminate men?
I agree, but It isn’t a discussion if you aren’t willing to give and take and come into the discussion open minded. Telling everyone they’re wrong because a study says so isn’t a discussion.